Are All Diamonds Blood Diamonds?

Shanika
Shanika
  • Published Content: 227
  • Total Views: 262,895
  • Favorited By: 86 CPs
Full Profile | Subscribe | Add to Favorites

Buy a Diamond, Kill an African

"Every diamond in De Beers Diamond Jewellery is conflict-free and child labour free."

For many Americans, clarity and size are the two most important considerations when choosing a diamond. These folks have little concern beyond fulfilling the status quo or pleasing their eager fiancés. A select few, however, are much more interested in where their diamonds come from. For them,
the above De Beers promise is the most important one a diamond company can make. These Americans are well aware of the horrifying nature of the conflict diamond industry and need reassurance that no blood had been spilled in the manufacturing of their precious gem.

Blood or conflict diamonds, aptly named due to the vicious nature in which they are obtained, are described by the United Nations as "...diamonds that originate from areas controlled by forces or factions opposed to legitimate and internationally recognized governments, and are used to fund military action in opposition to those governments, or in contravention of the decisions of the Security Council." Diamonds such as these, received international attention during the mid nineties as a result of bloody conflict in Sierra Leone. At that time, conflict diamonds accounted for about 4% of all diamonds. Since the enactment of the Kimberly Process, that number has been reduced to about 1%. The Republic of Congo, Liberia and the Ivory Coast are the three countries responsible for that small, yet significant percent.

The Kimberly Process Certification System, a UN backed system, was enacted in 2002 following a global outcry against blood diamonds. Both governmental and non-governmental organizations teamed up with the diamond industry to create a process that has since reduced the wide-scale manufacturing and distribution of blood diamonds. In fact, Diamondfacts.org found that the Kimberly Process was largely responsible for diamonds now accounting for much of the economic growth in Africa.

Diamondfacts.org provides a number of facts on their website that demonstrate the positive effects of diamonds, including,

 
Comments 1 - 6 of 6  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below
I want to believe diamonds are as clean as De Beers makes them out to be. Not that I'm ever going to buy a diamond.... The fact that people actually pay such inflated prices for these pretty rocks is what amazes me. And that keeps the demand high for all diamonds, including those that do cost someone their blood. But, then again, the same goes for almost every gallon of gasoline we buy. Anyway, very good article.

Posted on 02/13/2008 at 12:02:40 AM

De Beers might be a free conflict on child labor but what about the rest of companies is isn't fair to the children who work in this open pit mines. The International Trading Centers in eurpoe bought more than 125 million of dollars worth of diamond knowing the sistuation in some parts of Africa

Posted on 10/07/2007 at 10:10:00 AM

The demands put on a relationship or budding relationship and how it corresponds with a diamond being on a ring or how big it is/ expensive ect. is silly and I dislike diamonds mainly because of the shallow implications and developments in the human race ...the love of money root of all evil and all that, yup

Posted on 04/24/2007 at 10:04:00 AM

Very good article. Interesting information.

Posted on 12/19/2006 at 8:12:00 AM

I only buy CZ's (man made diamonds). They are just as pretty, a heck of a lot cheaper, and I don't have to worry if someone got hurt getting them (well unless the person overseeing the lab is a criminal mastermind; just kidding!) Good article with some provoking thoughts.

Posted on 12/18/2006 at 8:12:00 AM

I'd like to see de Beers disbanded, honestly. They are the ones that keep diamonds priced so high- if they were priced lower there would not be such conflict over them. They are fairly plentiful, it is only De Beers that makes them less so by limiting the amount on the market. But, they are not a U.S. company and are not subject to anti-trust laws.

Posted on 12/18/2006 at 1:12:00 AM

Comments 1 - 6 of 6 

Have more to say?
Become a Content Producer on AC

Most Comments Today