Find » Opinion/Editorial » Sarah Palin, Anne Kilkenny and the ...

Sarah Palin, Anne Kilkenny and the Authority to Ban Books

What is Objectionable to One May Mot Be Objectionable to Others

By saul relative, published Sep 06, 2008
Published Content: 685  Total Views: 949,938  Favorited By: 85 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.0 of 5
At one time, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was the mayor of Wasilla, Alaska. While she was mayor of that small town, Mayor Palin found herself at odds with people over various aspects of her job, which is the normal run of events with regard to politics. It happens. Not everybody will always be in agreement on a given topic. That is individualism and that is as it should be.

But Sarah Palin has a problem with wielding authority it would seem. The first red flag that went up when Senator John McCain announced Sarah Palin as his running mate was that she was under investigation by her own state legislature for an alleged abuse of power. Dubbed "Troopergate," this state-turned-national issue brought to light an alleged abuse of authority by the governor's office in the dismissal of the state Safety Commissioner because he had refused to fire Palin's sister's ex-husband, who was a state trooper at the time.

And then there was the citizen's letter from Wasilla resident Anne Kilkenny that has been circulating on the internet. Time magazine and the New York Times have gone on record that the allegations in the letter have been corroborated.

Anne Kilkenny grew up with Sarah Palin. She knows the family. She also has a problem with Sarah Palin's new mythologized status as the potential vice president of the United States. The letter is an attempt to rectify that.

The many odious items concerning Sarah Palin as a politician enumerated by Anne Kilkenny this writer will let pass for the time being in order to address the one issue most important to a writer and to a free society: the freedom of expression, the First Amendment. In her letter, Kilkenny states:

"While Sarah was Mayor of Wasilla she tried to fire our highly respected City Librarian because the Librarian refused to consider removing from the library some books that Sarah wanted removed. City residents rallied to the defense of the City Librarian and against Palin's attempt at out-and-out censorship, so Palin backed down and withdrew her termination letter."

Sarah Palin, Anne Kilkenny and the Authority to Ban Books
Wasilla , AK
United States of America

Sarah Palin has a problem with authority -- using it without abusing it.

Credit: Tricia Ward

Copyright: Wikimedia Commons

Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 36
Next >>
 
Well, in Sarah Palin's defense, she does seem to have cracked open a book or two since she got past The Cat in the Hat. Too bad we cannot say the same about George W. Bush. Apparently, he was so upset by his inability to penetrate a certain mystery novel in his past that he gave up reading books forever. Memo to Dumbya: Turns out it wasn't really Red's grandmother after all, but rather the wolf in disguise.

Posted on 09/26/2008 at 9:09:28 AM

 
One thing is certain in all this, J. Michael: None of these candidates are true conservatives. Not one...

Posted on 09/13/2008 at 12:09:47 AM

 
On one ticket we have the most holy one, The Messiah and his chief minion, the slick, business as usual, powerful east coast Senate liberal. The other ticket, a powerful Senator that although a hero in the Vietnam war, has since seemed to forget that America also has borders. His chief minion, a lipstick wearing, hockey mom governor. Fact check actually proves the basic premise of this article wrong. What is correct is that both Obama and McCain support SOCIALIST policies. McCain seems to me to be only slightly the less of the two evils, slightly. Since no other candidate has a chance of winning I vote for the ticket with Palin. My shallow narrow minded idea is that at least she is HOT! I would rather spend four years looking at her that Joe Biden.

Posted on 09/12/2008 at 6:09:56 AM

 
Noticed that, too, did youj, cahotek? Well, Bush muzzled the press during his tenure and they're still acting a bit skittish. Perhaps if they began to do their job and act as part of our democratic system by reporting the news and exposing the hypocrisy and corruption, then they wouldn't have to worry so much about being censored and browbeaten into submission. It's pathetic...

Posted on 09/10/2008 at 10:09:16 PM

 
The way she and her fellow tryants attacked the press during that convention was enough to get my permanent ire aroused. Most of the attacks were aimed directly at the 1st amendment.

Posted on 09/10/2008 at 10:09:04 PM

 
Don't put too much faith in the collective to make itself less ignorant, Eric. Remember, Germany had the most educated populace per capita in the world when it allowed Hitler to subvert its democracy and start his Third Reich. Remember also that Germany maintained then and remains nearly totally Christian. The people of the United States vote authoritarian ideologues into office at their own peril.

Posted on 09/10/2008 at 8:09:16 AM

 
Government is both, Jon -- individualistic and collective. And I never wrote that government was individualistic. Even a dictatorship takes the implied and forced consent of the ruled. A fascist state still has to have many players to oppress. I wrote: "Mayor Palin found herself at odds with people over various aspects of her job, which is the normal run of events with regard to politics. It happens. Not everybody will always be in agreement on a given topic. That is individualism and that is as it should be." I also point out that Sarah Palin is an authoritarian who likes to eliminate those that oppose her, giving her sole discretionary power in some instances. Even Bush has done this with his presidential signings and his exexutive privilege mandates. So there is individualism involved. It is up to Congress, the Supreme Court, and the people to make certain that the one does not rule the many.

Posted on 09/10/2008 at 8:09:37 AM

 
Excellent! The more I read the more I question.

Posted on 09/10/2008 at 5:09:48 AM

 
This is indeed frightening; though I haven't received the circulating e-mail in question, I had heard many of the stories surrounding it. I am disturbed by the fact that Palin would attempt to censor something that she personally took issue with, as opposed to going through the proper legal process. What's worse...I fear that many citizens of this country might not object to it. I hope that I can have more faith in people than that.

Posted on 09/10/2008 at 12:09:26 AM

 
EXCELLENT ARTICLE!!

Posted on 09/10/2008 at 12:09:40 AM

 
Sorry. I read your article an it is quite good. Sorry I blew my stack. I have a Crying Baby as my icon because I blow my stack quite readily, then regret it! ;-(

Posted on 09/09/2008 at 3:09:36 PM

 
Not only 60 days away from potentially being vice-president but only one heart attack, stroke or other life threatening disease away from being potentially president.

Posted on 09/09/2008 at 3:09:34 PM

 
Government is not about individualism. You are foolish to write that. How can be government, which is a collective organization, be predicated upon the selfish individualism of the governor? I'm glad I read the first paragraph of the article as it keys me on to why John McCain and Sarah Palin are so dangerous. The egocentric McCain, who was talking about himself when he assailted Barack Obama for being the New Messiah, is in this for one reason only: Self-aggrandizement. As Ross Perot said, McCain is an unprincipled striver.

Posted on 09/09/2008 at 3:09:04 PM

 
I agree, this is propoganda

Posted on 09/09/2008 at 3:09:37 PM

 
This is all lies! Get the facts straight.!!!! read http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_palin.html

Posted on 09/09/2008 at 3:09:08 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 36
Next >>
Advertisment