Seattle Caves on Christmas Trees

Jewish Rabbi Forces Sea-Tac Airport to Remove Christmas Trees

By Brian Tubbs, published Dec 11, 2006
Published Content: 81  Total Views: 83,235  Favorited By: 5 CPs
Rating: 3.3 of 5
For over a quarter century, Sea-Tac Airport has displayed Christmas (or, now more commonly called "Holiday") trees. Not this year. Why? Because, this year, a Jewish rabbi wanted a menorah erected as well. When the airport said 'no,' he threatened to sue. And down came the trees!

Outrage has correctly resulted. Said one employee (quoted in a local Seattle news outlet): "It's a Christmas tree! It's not like they were displaying crucifixes or menorahs or anything religious, but Christmas trees that have been around here for years."

The employee is correct. Yet, this is nothing new. Even secular Christmas symbols, like Santa Claus and the reindeer (and, yes, trees), are increasingly under attack. Why? Because minority groups find them offensive.Why? This is a good question.I have been a Christian for over 25 years. I've grown up in church. I've never heard a Bible study consider the deep theological implications of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. And I've apparently missed the very deep, spiritual references to evergreen trees in the accounts of Jesus' birth - provided by Matthew and Luke. Perhaps a non-Christian show them to me.

I find it laughable (on the one hand) and very frustrating (on the other) that even the warm-and-fuzzy, completely secular symbols of Christmas are now the subject of such debate. That I have to expend time defending a decorated tree is unfathomable to me. If Sea-Tac Airport had a nativity scene up with a big billboard declaring: "Believe in Jesus or go to Hell," then I can understand the rabbi being a bit bothered by that. But this was not the case. We're talking about trees! Trees with big red ornaments! I would like to know how many religious conversions were inspired by these obviously profound trees.Were airport passengers walking past the tree on their way to the ticket counter, stopping and saying: "Oh my, what a beautiful tree. I think I'm going to become a Christian now"?

But Sea-Tac caved. Why? Because they were threatened by a lawsuit. Yeah, that's it. The new American way: Do what I say - or I'll sue you.

Takeaways
  • Sea-Tac has displayed Holiday Trees for over 25 years. Not this year.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
Jeff, as I indicated in a different article, there may not be a "war" (probably isn't) against Christmas - but there should is a "campaign" of sorts (be it concerted or coincidental) against the public celebration of Christmas. There are many people and groups who are actively trying to discourage the public (and by public - I am referring not only to government but also commercial) celebration of "Christmas" (meaning by name). You have to see that.

Posted on 12/12/2006 at 1:12:00 PM

 
Good article. I just wrote an editorial about this situation today, but it is still waiting approval. Funny thing is that the Christmas tree really has it's roots in paganism. Up until the mid 1800's the Christmas Tree was considered an oddity in the US. I get offended everyday.. that is what happens in a country where you have freedom of speech.

Posted on 12/11/2006 at 10:12:00 PM

 
I agree that the lawsuit mentality in America is over the top...but as far as the christmas trees go, those who can't shut the hell up about the so-called "war on christmas' have brought this. Because they have a hissy when someone says "happy holidays" or calls it a "holiday tree" they have made it a symbol of a religious celebration, and therefore subject to scrutiny. Again, I wish it wouldn't have to come to this, I like "holiday trees" but perhaps the rabid followers of Bill O"Reilly and the like should just back off and let them be "holiday trees"

Posted on 12/11/2006 at 9:12:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On