The Fight Against Fat: A Personal or Public Preference?

By Audrey DiPlacido, published Dec 20, 2006
Published Content: 29  Total Views: 3,502  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Rating: 4.5 of 5
New York City staged the first drama when it outlawed trans-fat from all its restaurant's kitchens. My own city is currently attempting the same via County Health Board legislation directed by a local physician. This, of course, has home players in a snit because 'whatwe choose to eat is our choice not government's!' I applaud this say-so.

Trans-fats are a big business initiative created (for profit) by pumping hydrogen into vegetable oil to make it solid at room temperature (think Crisco). Present in foods since 1911, they became so "routine" that it was tricky to find a cookie or chip that didn't pack at least a little trans-fat-punch. The curtain slowly began to fall when health care professionals became convinced that trans-fat (a) raised bad cholesterol, (b) lowered good cholesterol and (c) was increasing the risk for heart disease in folks who ate a lot of it. Their dialogue prompted lay-person education which scripted the "eater" more choice.

Saturated fats have been eaten by humans for thousands of years; butter is the most common. These fats also go solid at room temperature and can raise total cholesterol. Made from animal fats, they had limited shelf life and pricey tag. Shoppers began an obvious guard against fat grams about forty years ago in joint venture with exercise and wellness.

Trans-fats are man-made from plants. At first it was reported that they were "better than" saturated fat because of their plant-base origin. No one informed the consumer that they provided companies cheaper product base with Nirvana shelf-life! It was just few years ago that science and reality shared the same page with us: that trans-fats can be as bad for the body as saturated fats.

The Fight Against Fat: A Personal or Public Preference?

A $25 donation to bantransfats.com will get you this tee!

Credit: www.banstransfats.com

Copyright: www.bantransfats.com

Takeaways
  • Fat 101: Do you follow your trans-fat intake? If not, should a governing body do it for you?
Did You Know?
Like life, fat owns a good/bad side. All fat. It's up to individual consumers to pick 'n choose their foods.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
 
the fast food industry fights against accurate disclosure of nutritional fact about its food. they are doing everything in their power to limit your ability to make accurate choices.

Posted on 12/22/2006 at 8:12:00 AM

 
i am sorry. I just don't get the resistance here. Do you realy think that you can tell if something is made with trans fat as opposed to butter, or deep fried in non hydrogenated veggie oil?

Posted on 12/22/2006 at 8:12:00 AM

 
It looks like the "food police" are firmly taking the reins of power. Most of us strive to have a more healthy diet, but it all boils down to personal choice. It seems to me that our society is becoming more and more like "Big Brother" every day and that's kinda scary!

Posted on 12/22/2006 at 2:12:00 AM

 
But surely there are ways to let people know what's in their food without dictating what they're allowed to eat by law. I'm sure Jurgis Rudkus would back me up on that statement.

Posted on 12/21/2006 at 9:12:00 PM

 
Thats just the type of attitude that Big Corporations want you to have... this way the can obfuscate the truth, hide facts, tear down food safety regulations so they can cut costs. Then they say its should be a persons choice to decide what they want to eat. but if you dont know what you are eating, how can you make a choice? You should read Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle" that is where our food safety would go if there was no regulation. i am baffled by the attitude that thinks the individual consumer can take on Big Food.

Posted on 12/21/2006 at 5:12:00 PM

 
I'm getting just a tad irritated with all of these insults to my intelligence, i.e. state and local governments' "We will save you from yourselves" mentality. Some responsibility for that can be laid at the feet of those who file frivolous lawsuits; also those who say "they" should do something about this instead of "I" should do something about this. "They" are going to be calling ALL the shots soon, if people don't start taking a little personal responsibility for what they eat, drink, smoke, or watch on T.V. Very nicely written, Ms. DiPlacido. Thank you.

Posted on 12/21/2006 at 3:12:00 PM

 
thats why they are just banned in restaurants.

Posted on 12/20/2006 at 4:12:00 PM

 
I think it would be smart for restaurants to list trans-fats but as for the government outlawing trans-fat is crazy. Making a resteraunt only offer non trans-fat foods is going to increase the price and put many businesses out of business.

Posted on 12/20/2006 at 3:12:00 PM

 
Sit-down style restaurants will probably be required to list the trans fat information on the menus. Much like some are doing will calories now.

Posted on 12/20/2006 at 12:12:00 PM

 
if you go to a restaurant and sit down to order... how would you know if trans fats are used? there are no labels in restaurants, you don't have the same choice as you do in a supermarket. the ban is not for packaged goods, its for restaurants. what would really be onerous is to require restaurants to offer both trans fats and non trans fat prepped food.

Posted on 12/20/2006 at 11:12:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
Most Commented On