Ballot Proposals in Michigan: Voters Will Decide on Medical Marijuana, Stem Cell Research

Michigan voters on November 4th will decide on ballot proposals for Medical Marijuana use and Stem Cell Research.

At this point, neither ballot proposal is generating high-profile emotion that would match the 2004 ban on gay marriage or the 2006 rollback of affirmative action. Political conservatives had
Ballot Proposals in Michigan: Voters Will Decide on Medical Marijuana, Stem Cell Research
 their way on both of those issues.

A petition drive for a referendum to create a part-time legislature failed to muster the necessary 380,000 votes. Michigan thus will remain one of only 11 states with a full-time governing body.

PROPOSAL 1: MEDICAL MARIJUANA

Thousands who suffer from afflictions ranging from AIDS to multiple sclerosis, from Crohn's disease to glaucoma, have reported that they receive relief from ingesting THC through pot.

Ballot proposals to protect these folks from criminal action has become a national trend. A petition drive is a typical option, because legislators shy away from right-wing charges that they are soft on drugs.

Voter approval of Proposal 1 in November would make Michigan the 13th state to act on behalf of medical marijuana supporters. Others are Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

The Michigan Coalition of Compassionate Care has put forward Rochelle Lampkin of Detroit as a spokeswoman. She is a 50-something grandmother who contracted MS as a young adult. She says she neither drinks nor smokes, and she once actually joined neighborhood pickets to protest at a "drug house" where reefer was sold.

In other words, in no way is Ms. Lampkin a druggie.

Pain behind her eyes a few years ago was becoming unbearable. A fellow MS sufferer encouraged her to try medical marijuana. She took a few tokes, even though it was against her principles, and voila - she felt relief that she says was long-lasting. She now is a regular user but insists she does not ingest enough to get high.

Debate over Proposal 1 comes on two fronts.

 
Comments 1 - 10 of 13 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Obviously there are some drawbacks to the use of marijuana for any purpose. Let's not forget the long term effects likes decreased cognitive abilities with prolonged and excessive use. It may very well alleviate pain for these patients. Legalizing the use of marijuana will cause many people who smoke it regularly to try to get a prescription for it to get around the law. I agree that we need more research.

Posted on 11/04/2008 at 6:11:40 AM

i am a parent of a spinal cord injury and i am all for the stem cell research. It would be great to see in my life time a cure for spinal cord injuries and to be able to see people walk that have not for years or a life time.

Posted on 11/01/2008 at 9:11:00 AM

It would be absolutely inhumane to deny anyone access to anything that could alleviate pain and nausea for the terminally ill. Really, Dave RN? I don't think that the terminally ill are concerned with second hand smoke... This is all part and parcel to the fact that we do not benefit in any way from the unnecessary criminalization of users to begin with. Prohibition didn't work with alcohol. Why would it work in the case of anything else. In this case, opponents want to continue making more problems out of its illegality than the drug itself has. Wake up America! It's high time we stop hating on a plant and infringing on our basic rights. This proposal is a big step in the right direction.

Posted on 10/19/2008 at 4:10:22 AM

i am voting for proposal one. dew to the fact. that i really don't think marijuana is that harmful as a drug and dose have its medical purpose's. i am a 18 year old male that lives in Marquette MI. and i have been researching vigorously. and hope that one day the nation will realize that legalizing marijuana would be the best way to go as millions of dollar's are used to shut out the drug.. and the thousands that are imprisoned dew to the drug. now this is a huge waist of tax payers money. even if we do not end up legalizing the drug nationally but i think taking it off of the "Schedule 1 drug" list would be the 2nd best way to go and in the history of the world i dont think that there is not a single case in witch a user has died from using to much marijuana just so people know

Posted on 10/16/2008 at 3:10:29 PM

No legitimate medication is dispensed in a form that is unable to be given solely to the intended patient. In a society that struggles to eliminate second-hand smoke why are we even considering a drug that promulgates even more exposure to second-hand smoke? Especially smoke containing more than 400 substances, many as toxic as that of cigarette smoke? We need further research!

Posted on 10/01/2008 at 7:10:38 PM

Why are those funding the tv adds against proposal 2 allowed to flat out lie? They're basing their case on anti-tax hysteria without one word about their right to life agenda. They should be prosecuted for fraud.

Posted on 09/25/2008 at 9:09:31 PM

Great article, Mike. I'm a strong proponent of medical marijuana.

Posted on 09/18/2008 at 6:09:22 PM

Great article, Mike. I'm a strong proponent of medical marijuana.

Posted on 09/18/2008 at 6:09:17 PM

Excellent reporting here! Very informative. :-)

Posted on 09/18/2008 at 3:09:13 PM

Great job!

Posted on 09/16/2008 at 4:09:22 AM

Comments 1 - 10 of 13 Next >>