Movie Review: Miss Potter

A Substantive Biopic About the Children's Book Author

By Racheline Maltese, published Dec 28, 2006
Published Content: 148  Total Views: 186,329  Favorited By: 26 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
Miss Potter, the new film starring Renee Zellweger and Ewan McGregor, tells the story of the fabulous famous children's book author, Beatrix Potter. Potter's books, first published about 100 years ago, have perhaps been so ubiquitous for generations, that we have never much thought about the woman behind them.

Potter is 32-years-old when she meets Norman Warne once her first book is accepted for publication. Living at home and long since past the age when her mother would even bother to introduce her to suitors, Potter is contentedly certain that she will remain single. She has, Miss Potter makes quite clear, all the friends she needs in her creations. For she doesn't just create her characters, but chats with them, travels with them, reassures them and regales them with the tales of her day. For any creative person who may similarly be often less of this world than the one in their heads, Potter's actions in this regard seem deeply familiar and it's extremely touching to see them portrayed on the screen (especially when what we usually get in stories about women deeply emeshed with their fictional words are far uglier turns, such as Peter Jackson's excellent Heavenly Creatures).

Warne and Potter slowly fall in love, an event which seems as unlikely to them both as the sudden and ferocious success of Potter's books. He proposes to her, and Potter's domineering (at least to the modern eye) parents are aghast -- after all, he is a tradesman. These period details are well-handled -- a hillarious and mostly silent old woman chaperone is one of the best reminders the film has to offer about the utter lack of freedom and privacy women have had historically. Eventually, a compromise is struck, and the parents agree that Warne and their daughter may marry, but only if they keep the engagement a secret for now, and only after a summar spent apart. Unfortunately, in that summer, tradgedy strikes and Potter, having no official link to Warne is denied even a chance for the proper rituals of grief.

Takeaways
  • Miss Potter has much of interest to say about the inner lives of creative people.
  • Miss Potter is a charming, family-appropriate film without moralizing or religious content.
  • Miss Potter offers an especially interesting window on early 20th cenutry women.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
Mr Tod, Comeuppance? Come up & see me some time: I'd eat you alive, you hunk! As for the film, where's my promised subplot about laying my eggs safely? It would have added gravitas, charm & a delicate sense of repressed angst to the film's rather-flimsy emotional/psychological infrastructure...

Posted on 01/09/2007 at 3:01:00 AM

 
Some animals are more equal than others: why was Sir Isaac Newt not given a prominent role in the screenplay? Just a throwaway mention early on, & then- nothing...

Posted on 01/08/2007 at 7:01:00 AM

 
I would like to have seen that flirt Jemima Puddle-Duck get her comeuppance in this film, ie end up in my belly!

Posted on 01/08/2007 at 6:01:00 AM

 
'...utter lack of freedom and privacy women have had historically.'- er, which women are we talking about here? It was difficult for Potter to get what she wanted on her terms, but she was rich, spoiled & determined as well as a loving daughter. She had loads of privacy- see her room in the film-, & did largely what she wanted within parental parameters which she almost-fully accepted until love came along. Even the true Suffragettes had the same problems, & they had freedom & privacy in abundance compared to the poor. It's as always: the bottom of the heap is 'denied' what the top privileges & awards itself.

Posted on 01/08/2007 at 6:01:00 AM

 
I think a spellcheck should be employed on this review...& perhaps a reality check on its last paragraph!

Posted on 01/08/2007 at 5:01:00 AM

 
Beatrix Potter meets Norman Warne in 1902 at the age of 35/6, in fact! She lived 1866-1943.

Posted on 01/08/2007 at 5:01:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On