A Response to J. Gorman's "Why We Should Be Teaching Intelligent Design to High School Students"
Applying Mr. Gorman's Logic Consistently
By Mike Larsen, published Dec 28, 2006
Published Content: 24 Total Views: 12,848 Favorited By: 3 CPs
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/101255/why_we_should_be_teaching_intelligent.html
so you do not come into this discussion blind. Or, if you do not feel the need to read it (I scarcely did, but having done so, I feel compelled by my moral scruples to give reply to this editor's pick), let me offer you an abstract.
Children should not be sheltered from ideas that challenge our traditional values. Evolution was rejected in its own day, and Intelligent Design is rejected today. Therefore we should teach Intelligent Design.
The fish have been released into the barrel.
Let us take the first argument listed above and approach it as politely and calmly as our rational minds allow, and apply its reasoning consistently.
Because we have neither qualifying evidence for or against, but because the idea is highly controversial, history classes should teach high school students that the Holocaust never happened. It is highly controversial, yes, but people certainly do argue both sides of the issue. And of course, Holocaust denial is being rejected by the West, but so was Darwinian evolution in its day, so because they were both rejected, they are of equal value. Also because they both question common conceptions of the world, they should both be taught.
One time in a dream, a pink unicorn told me that the Creature from the Black Lagoon generated the entire universe and everything in it in a single instant roughly 25,000 years ago. This, of course, offends the secular liberal atheist Godless communist homosexual feminist anti-God anti-man anti-capitalist anti-thought anti-life anti-love anti-humanity Illuminati Freemason Neo-Nazi CIA Bilderburg Vatican conspirators who work daily to drive God from the minds of our young children, and because it is so offensive, it should be taught. Because we can't disprove it rationally, the idea must be taught. Otherwise, we would ourselves be guilty of brainwashing our children with these atheistic liberal values.
A Response to J. Gorman's "Why We Should Be Teaching Intelligent Design to High School Students"
J. Gorman worryingly confronts the logical conclusions of his own arguments.
Credit: http://www.monteverdeinfo.com
Copyright: http://www.monteverdeinfo.com
You may also like...
- Maximizing Player Development Opportunities for the Elite High School Athlete
- The Science Curriculum and Intelligent Design Debate Simplified
- School Review of Halsey Junior High School
- A Parent's Perspective on Holy Cross High School, Delran, NJ
- Believing in God and Evolution: Where's the Intelligence in the Intelligent Design Model of Creation...
- Students in Chile Demand Better Education
- Students: Credit Vs Debit
- Backpack Essentials: School Supplies for Students
- Depression Heavy in College Students
- Presbycusis; An Examination of High Frequency Hearing Loss & Impact on Society
Takeaways
- 1. Intelligent Design has been roundly refuted every time it has come up in court.
- 2. Evolution is no longer a theory, it is simply a unification of two, obvious facts.
- 3. If we apply J. Gorman's logic consistently, we ought to teach a Poseidon-based water cycle, to be fair.
Did You Know?
People sometimes argue about whether or not the Holocaust happened. Therefore, according to Mr. Gorman, we ought to teach Holocaust denial as an alternative, equally-viable historical postulate.
Resources
- www.talkorigins.org
- Richard Dawking's "The Selfish Gene"
- Charles Darwin's "The Origin of Species"
Most Commented On



Kylyssa Shay
Add a Comment
Posted on 02/29/2008 at 3:02:29 PM
Richelle Hawks
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/25/2007 at 7:04:00 PM
Paula
Add a Comment
Posted on 12/28/2006 at 7:12:00 PM
Paula
Add a Comment
Posted on 12/28/2006 at 6:12:00 PM