Find » Business & Finance » Corporations Have Social Obligation...
Corporations Have Social Obligations Beyond "Playing by the Rules" of the Market and Serving Stockholder's Interests
Embed:
The main issue behind corporations being reluctant to involve themselves in anything beyond the immediate scope of their operational responsibilities is, of course, money. Spending on projects and activities not immediately within the corporation's scope of operations lowers the profit margins, thus reducing the corporation's value with its stockholders. This goes against the first definition of Friedman's stockholder theory, which states that the foremost social responsibility of the corporation is to increase its profits. The same theory, however, emphasizes the importance of approaching the achievement of high profit margins from the long-term rather than short-term position, which brings in Freeman's stakeholder theory and shows that, to be successful, corporation must have certain responsibilities to the environment - both social and physical - within which it operates.
More by Mark Fox
- Is Government-Sponsored Free Medical Care the Solution to Current Medical Insurance Problems?
- Credit Card Balance Transfers - Negotiating the Minefields
- The Effects of the Stock Market on the U.S. Then and Now
- Caryl Churchill's "Cloud 9": Changing Perspectives of Social Standards and Relationships
You may also like...
- Corporate Social Responsibility: Spotlig...
- Limited Corporate Social Responsibility
- Neglecting Social Responsibility
- Examples of Social Responsibility
- Corporate Responsibility and Social Resp...
- Social Problems Vs Social Responsibility...
- The Emerging Role of Social Responsibili...
- Social Responsibility and the Adult Ente...
- Social Investing
- Environmental Ethics and Corporate Respo...
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Today's Most Commented On
Advertisment