$700 Billion Bailout Fails; Dow Jones Sees Record Point Drop, Politicians Start Pointing Fingers

What Happened? Did Anyone Win? Or Did We All Lose?

The day started with everyone watching Wall Street and Washington like some frenetic tennis match. And when the electrical system failed at the sounding bell - it did not ring - a superstitious person might have taken it as an omen of things to come.

But even before that, the president held a press conference where he asked Congress to quickly pass the upcoming $700 billion bailout. And although the vote was expected to be close, the legislation was expected to
$700 Billion Bailout Fails; Dow Jones Sees Record Point Drop, Politicians Start Pointing Fingers
Date: September 29, 2008
 pass by a narrow margin.

But it was not to be.

The Stock Market Falls While Politicians Point Fingers

When the vote was taken, the measure failed. Almost two-thirds of the Republicans voted against the bill (133), while 140 Democrats voted for it. Only 65 Republicans voted in favor of the bill, while 95 Democrats voted against it.

The DOW-Jones Index on Wall Street, which had already fallen a few hundred points, plummeted.

In Washington, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-KY) immediately pointed the finger of blame at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), saying that a speech that she gave prior to the vote "poisoned" his fellow Republicans to the point that they backed away from the measure. (Speaker Pelosi had railed against the economic ineptitude of the Bush administration earlier in the day.) Barney Frank (D-MA) said in a press conference later that a couple of Republicans with their feelings hurt took it out on the country. He added that he would do everything in his power, including speaking "uncharacteristically nicely," to make them feel better about themselves if they would just change their vote.

President Bush, who was meeting with the president of Ukraine, said he was disappointed in the Congressional vote.

 
Comments 1 - 10 of 10  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Grrrr it's just a bandaid.

Posted on 10/05/2008 at 3:10:50 PM

Hey, Kim. Paulson set himself up as a "Financial Czar." They've built in a few safeguards for that but not enough. An oversight committee is no good unless the oversight is instituted BEFORE the buying, not after. Politicians usually do the oversight AFTER. Which does nobody any good.

Posted on 10/01/2008 at 10:10:36 AM

You are absolutely right, Charlotte. This should go on a case-by-case basis. Henry Paulson should be fired. Any corporation or financial institution the government agrees to lend money to should have every executive fired, replaced, and all bonuses and stock options taken from those that tanked the institutions.

Posted on 10/01/2008 at 9:10:54 AM

You're absolutely right, cahotek. I saw something to this effect somewhere, but you are right. This is a load of crap designed to bail out the big corporate contributors that give and give to politicians' election and reelection campaigns. Where's your bail out, my friend? Where is mine? Where's my neighbor's?

Posted on 10/01/2008 at 9:10:45 AM

"It's your fault!" "No! It's your fault!" "It's not my fault - it's your fault! . . . . "

Posted on 10/01/2008 at 8:10:38 AM

It's a trick... the money supply is deliberately increased so that people will go into debt, then the money supply is deliberately decreased so that the favored players can collect the assets of those who have gone into receivership. If you could see the amount the fed increased the money supply yesterday you would see that it was by about the same amount as the Dow Jones Average lost yesterday.

Posted on 09/30/2008 at 4:09:35 PM

I, too, have found the finger pointing most interesting. Jimmy Carter is even getting the blame for this! Good article, Saul!

Posted on 09/30/2008 at 10:09:44 AM

The amount of political maneuvering on both sides is staggering. After listening to Pelosi's speech, it almost seems as if she was trying to sabotage the thing. Her job is to bring the parties together in a non-partisan way, not cause more division. Like you, I don't think her speech had much to do with the actual vote, but that was the stupidest thing I've seen anyone do in a very long time. You're getting ready to take a vote, and you deliberately say things that you know will cause more division? It just doesn't make sense. I think there's more going on behind the scenes, including corruption and attempts to cover past deeds, that we may not find out about for some time. There are just too many unanswered questions, especially regarding Paulson's role and a few others.

Posted on 09/30/2008 at 10:09:48 AM

I'd just as soon watch Wimbledon... at least I understand the rules of tennis. This whole thing is way too complicated for most of us to understand. We have to bail out Wall Street or our own fortunes will decline. I get that. Reminds me of elementary school when a couple of children acted up and we all had to miss recess.

Posted on 09/30/2008 at 10:09:53 AM

Until some kind of accountability is built in to the bill, I hope it keeps failing. I don't think people are so much against the bailout as they are giving free reign for things to be continually mismanaged.

Posted on 09/30/2008 at 9:09:27 AM

Comments 1 - 10 of 10