Thoughts and Opinions on the 2008 Presidential Election

By Dean Shutt, published Jan 08, 2007
Published Content: 42  Total Views: 3,019  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Rating: 4.0 of 5
I have no earthly idea why we are thinking, talking and writing about the 2008 Presidential Election in December of 2006. I suppose it has something to do with the fact that virtually everyone sees this as a failed President, desperately flailing about in an effort to stay halfway relevant for the next two years. That being the case, we may as well argue unceasingly about who is waiting in the wings. No matter, it allows us to start our prognosticating early.

I have seen the early (very, very early) polls that show either McCain or Guiliani beating any Democratic challenger. That is well and good except for one minor hiccup, there is no way either of those two gets out of the primaries. In the case of Guiliani, he is pro-choice, pro-gay marriage and anti-gun. Anyone that thinks that is going to sell to the Republican base may as well start their Draft Rumsfeld movement for the Democratic ticket. Guiliani is a very interesting, very moderate Republican candidate, but he won't play to the right and the right will pick the nominee.

As for McCain, he is tacking hard to the right and stood foursquare behind the President for as long as was necessary. Since there are only about three people left in the country that are still standing behind Bush, it seems safe enough for the Straight Talk Express to jump those tracks. This rightward shift and his years of loyal service may be enough to get McCain the nomination (though the right still doesn't trust him). The only problem is that the McCain that gets the Republican nod will not be the straight talking maverick that independents love so much. Instead he will be a very damaged, very exploitable candidate that has trouble against a moderate Democrat.

Which brings us to the Democrats. The only three worth mentioning as I write are Hillary, Obama and Edwards. To be sure there will be a dark horse or two along the way to stir things up and the media will no doubt anoint some mid-southern Governor as the second coming along the way. However, when all is said and done, one of those three names will be on the podium in New York/Denver accepting the Democratic nomination.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
Umm, he never resigned and the impeachment failed. What is wrong with you that you care so much about a 60 year old's sex life? Get some therapy, deal with your daddy issues and then come back and attempt an informed comment.

Posted on 06/19/2007 at 10:06:00 AM

 
I believe Hillary for Pres had been going on long before 2006 and the 2008 election. Interesting point having Bill Clinton as, um First Man in the White House. Do people really want a man living in the White House that resigned (or was he impeached, I forget) from the Presidency? Everyday people, for the most part, did not care about Monica, but think about it, he gets a second shot of playing around while Hillary is busy running the country?

Posted on 06/19/2007 at 10:06:00 AM

 
Good article. Yes it is early to talk about 2008. But do you think that the Democrats could have been thinking about 2008 in 2004? Did the Democrats throw the 2004 election? http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/130878/did_democrats_throw_the_2004_presidential.html

Posted on 04/03/2007 at 11:04:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On