Is a Writers' Strike Near? Studios Reject SAG's Request for New Talks

Two months after the Screen Actors Guild contract with the Hollywood studios and television networks expired, actors are still working under expired terms and with an eventful September coming to a close that included elections and a polling
Is a Writers' Strike Near? Studios Reject SAG's Request for New Talks
 of membership support for continued negotiations, little forward progress has actually been achieved by either side.

The Hollywood talent unions usually ask for larger annual contributions from the networks and studios -- companies collectively represented by the Association of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) -- to their pension and health care funds, as well as increases in minimum wages. Negotiations this year have been complicated by the ascendancy of the Internet as a new distribution medium for traditional content and the rise of original digital content such as webisodes, muddying the water even further.

The disagreement is simple: content companies don't want unions to cover online distribution or digital property, but the unions obviously do.

The practicality of such disagreements are far more complex, however. The new contract provisions, usually referred to collectively as "new media", are mostly about the right to cover digital content at all, and residuals, the literary equivalent of book royalties. Residuals are payments for reuse of material such as when television shows hit syndication or are sold on DVD. Directors benefit less from residuals than do actors and writers so their pattern of bargaining was somewhat different this year, without even accounting for the distinctly different personalities of each union.

The Writers Guild of America is considered militant and willing to strike at any time. The Directors Guild of American is the literal opposite of the writers, seen as too eager to please the studios and willing to take any deal it is given, and has never struck in its entire existence.

The Screen Actors Guild's 100,000+ members are perceived to sit somewhere in the middle.

 
Comments 1 - 7 of 7  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Jon, I didn't write the title. My title was apparently rejected and replaced by Associated Content which they have been known to do from time to time to make it more "searchable". They introduced the embarrassing error -- which they are also known to do from time to time -- and despite my emails requesting that it be fixed, nothing has happened. There's nothing I can do about it.

Posted on 10/03/2008 at 10:10:52 AM

Ah, your title is wrong. It is ACTORS, not writers.

Posted on 10/03/2008 at 10:10:33 AM

Absolutely Will, I don't think hardly anyone realizes the pay disparity and work availability in these guilds. I don't know much about specifics of SAG, in the WGA we're all well aware of the talking points because they all happen to be true. Half the union doesn't have any work at any given time, and the top 10% of the membership makes 90% of the money. These two unions represent people that need a union perhaps even more than ones that might be more familiar and talked about like auto workers unions.

Posted on 10/03/2008 at 1:10:26 AM

As a screenwriter who wrote episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation & Deep Space Nine, I view a potential labor strike as an unfortunate, but sometimes necessary decision to ensure fair treatment for unions. Now with SAG, audiences should realize that most actors - as with writers - are not bringing home millions of dollars - but earning just enough to keep food on the table. The glamor of Hollywood implies all players in the industry - writer - actor - etc - are incredibly wealthy. This of course is not the case.

Posted on 10/02/2008 at 1:10:30 PM

Pardon, it's not about *greed*. Also the title is not my fault, I didn't write "Is a *Writers* Strike Near", they did. This is about SAG.

Posted on 10/01/2008 at 10:10:39 PM

"Why do actors believe that they deserve a better deal than writers and directors?" Because it was a bad deal. The provisions that cover streaming media mean no residuals for the first 17 days any given TV show is rebroadcast online. The overwhelming majority of traffic comes in those first 17 days so the period during which actors and writers would earn the most residuals amounts to a free ride for the billion dollar conglomerates. It's not about freed or arrogance, it's about getting a fair deal for both sides, and the DGA/WGA deal while a *huge* improvement over what the AMPTP was originally offering, is still a pretty lame deal.

Posted on 10/01/2008 at 10:10:01 PM

Oh brother here we go again. More Arrogance! Why do actors believe that they deserve a better deal than writers and directors? And now they are proposing to strike in these horrid economic times? What support do the actors think that they will get? SAG will just take down the Los Angeles economy with them. This is just unconscionable. I think that actors actually deserve a reduction. They are just egotistical parrots. They emote and read the lines that they are given,not exactly brain science.

Posted on 10/01/2008 at 10:10:56 PM

Comments 1 - 7 of 7