Senate Bailout Bill Up for Vote; Citizens Protest, World Leaders Watch and Wait

The Senate is poised to vote tonight on a 451-page conglomeration of legislation that includes 113 pages relating to the Wall St. bailout. The Senate legislative package revives the bailout bill rejected by the House of Representative Monday and
Senate Bailout Bill Up for Vote; Citizens Protest, World Leaders Watch and Wait
 incorporates tax breaks and myriad provisions not specifically related to redressing the economic crisis including energy policy, mental health parity and national disaster relief. The full text of the Senate bailout bill is here.

Mark to Market Provisions

Section 132 of the bailout bill authorizing the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) to suspend mark to market accounting when it is determined to be in the public interest remains unchanged from the House version. Also unchanged is Section 133 requiring an SEC report within 90 days of the bailout bill's enactment on the feasibility and desirability of modifying mark to market.

Mark to market has been the subject of intense media coverage since the House bailout bill failed, with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, writing in Forbes, quoting a Chicago economist as blaming mark to market for 70% of the market crisis. The Center for Audit Quality (CAQ) opposes changing mark to market, deeming the rule essential to transparency and informed market decision making. The CAQ credits the mark to market rule with revealing the severity of the nation's credit crisis and states that the rule did not create the crisis.

FDIC Limits

Federal Deposit Insurance which insures bank accounts up to $100,000 would be temporarily increased to $250,000 through December 31, 2009 under Section 136 of the Senate bailout bill. This provision is veritable window dressing since most bank depositors concerned about inadequate insurance coverage can establish multiple qualifying accounts under the $100,000 limit and receive full insurance coverage on each. The provision is aimed at preventing bank runs by large depositors.

Executive Compensation

 
Comments 1 - 10 of 26 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

I'm not sure it's doable - how much bad paper can one government hold, how much unsecured, risky debt can it take on?

Posted on 10/08/2008 at 6:10:56 AM

TIME TO TAKE IT TO THE STREETS! PROTEST STOP ALL WORK STOP ALL BUYING FOR ONE DAY ...OR SHUT UP AND PAY

Posted on 10/03/2008 at 12:10:01 PM

Great job!

Posted on 10/02/2008 at 3:10:49 PM

OH! and Thank You Carol for your Excellent report. I forgot to Thank You after being so PO'd about this MESS....again Great Report.

Posted on 10/02/2008 at 2:10:15 PM

I AM SICK AND TIRED of the way this country has been run for the last 8 years. It's been nothing but lies,Lies and more LIES and at the end of the day, the Hard Working American has to PAY the PRICE in ALL aspects. It's Not Fair that we have to come out of our pocket (with thousands of dollars)to fix what didn't have to be. I have Republican and Democrat friends alike that both feel this Country has been lead by a Greedy,Self Centered, Idiot, that doesn't give a Rat's behind about the American people........The unnecessary war has shown just that. It's ASS backwards to have to bail the RICH out and have them still go home with Millions of dollars while we scrape up 7+ thousand dollars to pay for their MESS.

Posted on 10/02/2008 at 2:10:51 PM

Thank you for responding to my comment. My concern is that a hasty act adding or modifying regulations could also be a mistake. There may have been valid reasons for repealing some of the regulations. Meanwhile, some form of emergency legislation is clearly needed to reverse the economic trends toward a deep recession. So the question is: How do we fight the recession if the banks remain determined to tighten qualifications for loans, thereby strangling all types of businesses? How do we avoid a stock market and bond market crash that will leave all companies without a method of gaining funds for the short term? New regulations wil not achieve this end.

Posted on 10/02/2008 at 2:10:09 PM

As always you are on top of things.

Posted on 10/02/2008 at 8:10:33 AM

Great reporting.

Posted on 10/02/2008 at 7:10:19 AM

Interesting point about the Senate John but by the same logic this bill should not pass the House, the more direct representatives of the people who appear stil to be overwhlemingly opposed to this bailout. One thing I would say about your emergency argument is that this legislation could have taken many forms- there is no magic to the current version and it is not a good bill. The argument that Congress will deal with details later (not your statement but a theme resounding in some press reports) does not seem genuine. Now is the time to create a bill that does what needs to be done including fund the bill from the problem source and assure accountability. If it is not done now, it most likely will never be done. And with the burden that this bill places on the American public now, the economy can be expected to worsen for the average American.

Posted on 10/02/2008 at 6:10:04 AM

The Senate should take the time to study the regulations before changing them. The changes we all desire will come after Congress re-convenes. The difficulty was that this crisis does not afford us the luxury of time. Already, businesses are having a hard time getting loans to finance the restocking of their materials. That trasnslates into layoffs. The banks are tightening the restrictions on loans and mortgages, That translates into layoffs. The stores are selling less and the manufacturers' inventory are increasing. That translates into layoffs. The Federal Reserve Board has the power to react to an emergency situation. They did. And that is one big reason why the deep recession has been stalled off. But the danger is far from over. Emergency action is needed by the Congress or thousands of businesses will fail, the unemployment rate will edge upward and millions of people will suffer because of the mistakes of a few. That is why I favor the current bail out.

Posted on 10/02/2008 at 5:10:38 AM

Comments 1 - 10 of 26 Next >>