Find » Sports » Steve Nash: The Most Overrated NBA ...

Steve Nash: The Most Overrated NBA Superstar

By Steve, published Dec 29, 2006
Published Content: 12  Total Views: 8,428  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 2.7 of 5
Let me start off by saying, Steve Nash is a great point guard, probably the best in the NBA. But he is overrated. Marked especially by the fact that he has two MVP awards.

Contrary to popular belief , just because you are great doesn't mean you're exempt from being overrated. Even the legendary Michael Jordan has been overrated several times, when he is put into a god-like untouchable status. Overrated doesn't mean he's bad, just that people think he's better then he is. I just had to give the English lesson to some of you people out there.

People love to give Steve Nash all the credit for "making his teammates better", but what they fail to realize, is that Steve Nash didn't make Shawn Marion, Joe Johnson, Amare Stoudemire, or Boris Diaw good or great players. Of course he helped, he is a great point guard with terrific point guard, with terrific vision, so traditionally he's going to help players put points on the board. Something he has definitely helped Raja Bell with, who wouldn't be anywhere near the shooter that he is without Nash, and playing in the Phoenix Suns style of play.

The Suns spread the floor better then any other team. Everyone from their one to their four are excellent 3 point shooters. They also get much more possessions the most teams in the league, combine that with their run and gun system, and you have the best offense in the league. But you also have the biggest stat inflating system in the league as well. Steve Nash would never average what he does if he played in a set half court system, such as with the Spurs, or the Mavericks.

What about the myth that Steve Nash makes his teammates better? Well he does, just not the level that is believed. Does anybody remember the fact that Dirk Nowitzki and the Mavericks got better when Nash left? Amare Stoudemire was already becoming a great player before Steve Nash went to the Suns, if you watched Suns games the seasons before Nash, you would know this. The combination of Amare Stoudemire out a in 2004 and Stephon Marbury being their point guard is why they lost.

Takeaways
  • Steve Nash didn't deserve either of his MVP awards
Did You Know?
Joe Johnson is averaging 28 points, 5 rebounds, and 4 assists on 50% shooting without Steve Nash.
Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 17
Next >>
 
steve nash is not overated neither is michel jordan i would love to see one of u 45 year old low life wanna bies try and ddo that emai me blue_jay_s@yahoo.com

Posted on 05/06/2008 at 8:05:12 AM

 
Steve Nash is totally overrated, I agree and I wrote a post here about it: http://www.everythingisoverrated.com/?p=20

Posted on 04/25/2008 at 7:04:51 AM

 
crap some of the text was cut off... whatever. Anyways, Steve Nash IS overrated.

Posted on 11/15/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

 
Just a great article. Finally someone tells it how it really is. I mean Steve Nash up in the ranks with Chamberlain, Jordan, Bird, Russell, Magic, Stockton, Olajowon, Erving, Isiah, Malone, etc and etc??? He's far from being even the best player of today imo. I mean I'd take many other players today over Nash: KG, Duncan, Bryant, LBJ, Wade, Allen, Ming, Nowitzki, Iverson, Kidd, and etc. Something is definately wrong here. Back to legends like Russell, Jordan, Bird, Magic, Chamberlain, and etc. All were great from their rookie seasons until they retired for the most part, won rings, knew how to defend, made huge impacts in sports the world has never seen, and just so much more... why does Steve fricken Nash deserve to be in the ranks of those guys?? He just doesn't compare at all. He was nothing his first four years, and even after that he was an above average point quard with no defense, nothing more.... so he went to a fast paced offensive system surrounded by pla

Posted on 11/15/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

 
I totally agree with the article; the system makes his stats and he rarely dominates games. Diaw stepped up and admirably replaced Stoudamire but one can argue that Marion is as irreplacable as Nash. The real "crime" here is that Barbosa, Marion and Bell get no credit for team's success. Worst MVP in recent memory. The Suns improvement is based on Nash, Amare, Marion, Joe Johnson, Q-Richardson Bell and Barbosa; this is not an exclusive club. The media is cheating Kobe and LeBron; I think it's a shame.

Posted on 05/20/2007 at 7:05:00 PM

 
Pull your head out. Stop hating and look at it objectively. Nash is averaging MORE assists per game, more points, and is shooting better from the field this year than his previous two seasons when he won the MVP. You don't have to like it, but the bottom line is that he is playing better this year than he did the year you say he deserved the MVP and his team is better this time around too. See how stupid this sounds. Nash not the MVP? The question is who has done more than Nash to deserve it this year?

Posted on 05/02/2007 at 4:05:00 PM

 
I guess I don't understand that you admit to Nash being the best PG in the league, yet he is overrated? Oh, and either I'm reading wrong or Mr. Roberts is suggesting Nash's greatness is overexaggerated because he's white, which is a joke.

Posted on 02/07/2007 at 7:02:00 AM

 
Response Continued: In ending, Steve Nash is a great point guard and in a league dominated by players of color, he definitely stands out as a perinnial all-star, no doubt; and, I will give him his 1st MVP title, but the powers to be in the media really need to stop promoting and exaggerating his greatness and give other players of substanially more over-all talent their due. (Please forgive the mispelled words, was in a hurry)

Posted on 01/22/2007 at 9:01:00 PM

 
Response Continued: Now that Amare is back, the Suns are even better. I sincerely believe I could replace Nash with Chris Paul, Jason Kidd, Dwayne Wade or LeBron James, I would even throw Allen Iverson on that list and the Suns would be at the same level they are now and even better defensively; can you say the same for Nash and the other teams? If so, let me know. Last but not least, is Steve Nash really worthy of being mentioned in the likes of Larry Bird, Magic Johnson, Michael Jordan, Bill Russell or Wilt Chamberlain? Lets be real, absolutely not, then why put him there? All those guys won rings by the time they were his age and had definitely took their teams to the finals. I thought people would have recognized how much in error they were after one of the leagues deserved MVP canidates, Dwayne Wade, won the championship. In ending, Steve Nash is a great point guard and in a league dominated by players of color, he definitely stands out as a perinnial all-star, no doubt; and, I wi

Posted on 01/22/2007 at 9:01:00 PM

 
Response Continued: How about the tangable effect of DEFENSE, The three players mentioned all have more steals and defensive rebounds per game and are not concidered defensive liabilities to their teams such as Nash. So whose really is more valuable? Nash has yet to prove he could take over a game in a pressure filled playoff situation or will his team to victory when it really counts, (Check out Scottie Pippins comments on that one; and, Scottie has a little championship experience, as well as playing with a guy who had that will and skill); Nash couldn't do it with Dallas and he hasn't done it with Phoenix. No doubt he's an all star, but if you really want to see the key to the Suns success, check out the efficiency of The Matrix (Shawn Marion), check out the level he elevated his game without Amare, the rebounds, steals and blocked shots, things Steve Nash had no effect on; don't forget, he's an All-Star! Now that Amare is back, the Suns are even better. I sincerely believe I could

Posted on 01/22/2007 at 9:01:00 PM

 
Response Continued: He will lead in the categories of APG, FG% and FT% and not by much I may add, his largest advantage is over Kobe with Kobe at 4.5 and Nash at 10.5, however, Kobe was in the top 10 in effeciency, number 1 in points, rebounds and assist per game (PRA-PG), number 1 in scoring and NBA 1st team all defense for the third time in 4 years. Go figure! If you take the difference in the assist number and calculate the total point differential (feel free to count them all has 3 points) and compare to Wades and James stats, you will see that they were responsible for more points on the board, as well as finishing in the top 7 in efficiency, top 4 in PRA-PG, top 20 in steals and top 5 in scoring. Nash was not in the top 10 of any of these categories and he definitely wasn't mentioned in steals or defensively. Here's something else to think about, everyone talks about how he's the engine that makes the team run, such an intangleble isn't it? How about the tangeble effect of DEFEN

Posted on 01/22/2007 at 7:01:00 PM

 
Response Continued: Isn't that what the championship and championship MVP is all about. I see it this way, The most valuable player should be someone who if put in any and every team situation in the league would not only enhance and improve that teams competitivness, but be able to maintain his individual dominance over his competition thereby making him the most valuable PLAYER in the league. For instance, would Nash be able to replace Kobe Bryant in LA and take that same team projected to finish last in their division to the playoffs, and then position his team for victory with a 3 to 1 advantage over the Suns? Would Nash be able to replace LeBron James in Cleveland and propel them to the playoff level of success they achieved last year? Could Nash have replaced Dwayne Wade in Miami and would have willed and individually propelled that team to the world championship? The answer is NO! Take all three of those players stats and compare them to Nashes, He will lead in the categories

Posted on 01/22/2007 at 7:01:00 PM

 
Well my fellow basketball enthusiast, so the Nash debate continues. I agree with Jon in some instances and with Paul as well; however I ask both of you and others to look at a few other things. Steve Nash does what a point guard is suppose to do period! That is, distribute the ball, control the flow of the offense, lead the team and when needed, score; And he does it in a significantly above average way. However, there is something else that point guards are suppose to do, DEFEND!!!! Overrated? No, excessively marketed by the media powers to be, given more credit that he deserves for a teams success, and yes, awarded the leagues MVP multiple times and thereby placed historically beside superstars that are significantly and substancially above his caliber of play, ABSOLUTELY!!!!! Before we break down Steve Nash, here's a little sumpin to think about; Why is it that everyone seems to put substanial emphasis on the TEAMS over-all success in determining the Most Valuable PLAYER in the leag

Posted on 01/22/2007 at 7:01:00 PM

 
Paul has an excellent point. The article was based on opinion rather than statistics, and a controlled investigation (play without Steve, play with Steve) . Good article for stirring it all up though, but zero for relevant content and supporting facts.

Posted on 01/11/2007 at 7:01:00 PM

 
I don't deny Steve Nash's greatness as a point guard and a basketball player. But he shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath as guards such as Isaiah Thomas and John Stockton. His impact is overrated. He's a product of the system. And he lucked out just like I said in my article. He's played on wo of the fastest teams, and two of the greatest offensive teams of the decade. Mavericks and Suns. His stats or inflated compared to most of the league. He would still be great in another system, but in no way would he be as "great" as he is now.

Posted on 12/29/2006 at 10:12:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 17
Next >>
Advertisment