Of course, after the first c-section, it is likely another will be performed, as it is currently viewed as the safest way to deliver after a previous c-section. There are, however, mothers who opt for VBAC, or Vaginal
Birth After Cesarean. For many mothers, this has been a very safe and successful method after a c-section (60-80% of mothers who attempt it are successful), yet many doctors and hospitals refuse to allow this method of childbirth to be attempted. Why? It can of course be quite risky, especially in cases of mothers who had placental problems in past pregnancies, women with high vertical incisions, and the risk of uterine rupture is real (though rare). So why are doctors and hospitals opting to not even take it on? For the hospitals equipped to perform an emergency cesarean and choosing not to allow VBAC, what message does this send to pregnant women?
For the doctors, the risk of a malpractice lawsuit is very real. While the U.S. continues to debate the current laws of negligent torts (malpractice lawsuits), the truth is that some physicians are practicing what is known as defensive medicine. By performing procedures having little or no medical benefit to a patient, but keep them safe from a lawsuit, one can imagine the increase in patient's insurance costs, but also something even more serious for the practicing physician. Loss of confidence and self-respect. One would think that a doctor who is too scared of a malpractice suit would be more inclined to perform a procedure purely at a patient's request, rather than for medically necessary reasons.
Regardless of the reason, are patient requested cesarean sections truly a danger to woman and infant? A recent conference of the ACOG decided to address the rising c-section rates and the controversy surrounding what they are calling "cesarean delivery upon maternal request" (CDMR). The worry is that some mothers are scheduling a c-section for the ease of knowing when they will deliver, having a sitter ready for other children at home, ready to walk into the hospital. Opinions aside, is this a safe way to go?
According to Dr. Mary D'Alton, director of obstetrics and gynecology at Columbia University Medical Center, the data is well, inconclusive. "There just isn't sufficient evidence at this time to fully evaluate the benefits and risks of cesarean delivery based on maternal request compared to normal vaginal delivery. "There was consensus, says Dr. D'Alton, that CDMR is not recommended for women who are planning on having several children since the risks of placenta previa and placenta accrete increase with each cesarean delivery."
For the doctors, the risk of a malpractice lawsuit is very real. While the U.S. continues to debate the current laws of negligent torts (malpractice lawsuits), the truth is that some physicians are practicing what is known as defensive medicine. By performing procedures having little or no medical benefit to a patient, but keep them safe from a lawsuit, one can imagine the increase in patient's insurance costs, but also something even more serious for the practicing physician. Loss of confidence and self-respect. One would think that a doctor who is too scared of a malpractice suit would be more inclined to perform a procedure purely at a patient's request, rather than for medically necessary reasons.
Regardless of the reason, are patient requested cesarean sections truly a danger to woman and infant? A recent conference of the ACOG decided to address the rising c-section rates and the controversy surrounding what they are calling "cesarean delivery upon maternal request" (CDMR). The worry is that some mothers are scheduling a c-section for the ease of knowing when they will deliver, having a sitter ready for other children at home, ready to walk into the hospital. Opinions aside, is this a safe way to go?
According to Dr. Mary D'Alton, director of obstetrics and gynecology at Columbia University Medical Center, the data is well, inconclusive. "There just isn't sufficient evidence at this time to fully evaluate the benefits and risks of cesarean delivery based on maternal request compared to normal vaginal delivery. "There was consensus, says Dr. D'Alton, that CDMR is not recommended for women who are planning on having several children since the risks of placenta previa and placenta accrete increase with each cesarean delivery."
Type in Your Comments Below
jocelyn brady
02/20/2007
This is very informative! I have been curious about the C-section procedure, especially because it seems that hollywood startlets are opting in so frequently. Thank you for the info.
Summer Minor
02/11/2007
Great article! I agree with Heather B. below. In my opinion, c-sections are too risky. Especially when planned out of convenience.
Heather B.
02/08/2007
A C-section delivery carries a longer recovery time for the mother, a higher risk of breathing problems for the infant, and can interfere with breastfeeding. It makes her more likely to hemorrhage and also, next time around, her uterus may rupture, causing severe results for her and her unborn child. I personally do not think C-section should be chosen for non-medical reasons, except in dire circumstances. Believing that labor is going to be too painful, or the baby might be too big, to me, just isn't enough. It is up to the woman, but that doesn't mean the choice does not carry risks that far outweigh that of vaginal delivery iin the average situation.
L. Shepherd
01/25/2007
Jennifer- I hate to tell you this, but the doctor did that on purpose. There is no reliable way to know how large a baby is in the womb. A doctor will 'estimate,' but the estimate has such a large margin of error that it is useless. You were told that the baby was huge in order to scare you into a c-section. It happens all the time. The doctor made a few thousand more off you and got to go golfing that weekend instead of being on call.
Stephanie Guidry
01/25/2007
Thanks everyone for their comments. I addressed this earlier in the comments, but I just wanted to clarify: I am not against any women that gives birth naturally or by c-section by choice. I think labor is such a tough thing regardless of the method that women should not be judging each other, making another feel like they are wrong or freaks. I just wanted to shine a spotlight on what I thought was a interesting phenomenon, moms choosing a surgical procedure for reasons other than medical ones. I hope that all mothers can find that competent physician to help them to come to a decision that benefits both baby and mom. I am glad to read everyone's thoughts on this, and hope that this at least keeps us aware of the different advances and choices that are being presented in the field of obstetrics.
Margaret Delle
01/25/2007
Jennifer, childbirth doesn't have to be horrible, nor is it really something to be feared. Our bodies are built to do it and we've been told for about a century now that women's bodies are inherently faulty and incabable. I'm surprised it's not a bigger feminist issue, given that obstetrics started as a male-dominated profession and led to women "submitting" in so many ways to male interference and male management. ;)
Terri Rimmer
01/25/2007
I had an emergency C-section because the placenta was in her way and she couldn't get out. The recovery was hell but she would have died otherwise. In the old days before C-sections, I would have died.
Jennifer Thompson
01/24/2007
Ms. James: Perhaps you didn't get it. Taking ownership of one's body means just that. You make your choice, I make mine, but let's each mind our own business. Good for you as far as no tearing, but many women do. I had my reasons for making my choice, and the point is that it's just fine if every woman were to choose a C-section. Every woman's body is her own. Now do you understand my point?
Jennifer Thompson
01/24/2007
I guess my entire point is the the PRIMARY CHOICE should be the woman's. When are we going to start taking ownership of our lives?
Jennifer Thompson
01/24/2007
Continued - But, it is known that a C-section delivery is less traumatic for mother and child. Tip: C-section moms should have physical rehab afterward though; those thick muscles that are cut help support the back.
But here's my point; no matter what, it should be the mother's choice, no matter the reason. Hello, ladies! It's YOUR body! Why get defensive and preface, "I had a C-section," with "it was purely for medical reasons." So what if it was or wasn't? Who said you had to earn your stripes? Who said it was our duty to endure something horrible? Who said it's bad to be scared of childbirth?
Comments 1 - 10 (of 31)
Next >>




