Teamsters for Obama

By Lenora Murdock, published Oct 07, 2008
Published Content: 895  Total Views: 2,071,536  Favorited By: 159 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.3 of 5
It's not surprising that one of the United States oldest and most powerful Unions, The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, has voiced their support of Barak Obama. As of February 2008, Teamsters has endorsed Obama for President. That not only means throwing money behind Obama, but, according to James P. Hoffa, Teamsters President Teamsters are manning phone banks, making home visits, and participating in voter education.

Hoffa led the Teamsters to endorse Obama because he feels Obama offers real change working families need. He has also evaluated the candidates based on The Employee Free Choice Act, Mexican trucking, worker misclassification legislation, trade policies, and aircraft maintenance outsourcing, among other issues. Hoffa believes Obama is the man who will provide answers Teamster and its families need, citing McCain as the man "on the side of big business."

The Employee Free Choice Act is important to Teamsters and all Unions because it allows employees to choose to join or organize a Union without interference from their employer. This would enable employees in traditionally non-unionized business sectors, such as retail, to create or join a Union. Such legislation could break the back of businesses which base pay on sales and performance. Unionized employees have the potential and the tendency to demand pay raises and benefits that, sometimes, employers are unable to provide.

True Employee choice comes when the employee chooses the industry in which they will pursue a career. They should be aware of potential benefits, pay scales, and setbacks.

Teamsters firmly support Obama as the candidate who "understands the rank and file" and who will make changes need for working families. As a member of a retired Teamster family it seems to me those who employ Teamsters for transportation also need the support of our next president. If employers are taxed to death, Teamsters are going to lose more jobs. Unionized bargaining power is of little use in gaining pay raises, benefits, and resolving work issues when an employer is taxed to the point of closing the doors.

Comments
Comments 1 - 11 of 11
 
 
Excellent reporting and summation.

Posted on 10/11/2008 at 12:10:33 PM

 
Whoa!

Posted on 10/09/2008 at 5:10:45 PM

 
Interesting and informative read!

Posted on 10/08/2008 at 11:10:00 PM

 
A good article. But, the Obama platform favors workers much more than the McCain platform, especially on critical issues like healthcare. Redistribution of existing spending will help fund most of the programs Obama proposes. But, without access to loans - either candidate's proposals can't rely on bonds, etc. to finance much of what they want to do, especially on necessary energy infrastructure changes - and I foresee tax increases. McCain last night said the last president to increaase taxes during tough economic times was Herbert Hoover. He misspoke. It was George H. Bush. Just because a candidate doesn't philosophically support additional taxation doesn't mean when faced with reality he will not raise taxes.

Posted on 10/08/2008 at 9:10:40 AM

 
:)

Posted on 10/08/2008 at 8:10:31 AM

 
Good coverage, not surprising.

Posted on 10/08/2008 at 7:10:40 AM

 
great reporting!!

Posted on 10/08/2008 at 2:10:16 AM

 
Perhaps our leaders should have thought about this before encouraging the exportation of manufacturing operations and before embracing the trickle down theory. Perhaps our conservative politicians, who feel that the executives and management should benefit with huge tax incentives while the poor are not entitled to a decent income, should redefine the phrase "Promote the general welfare of the nation" to "Promote the general welfare of the rich." Oh and by the way, the practice of the conservative politicians proves that even they believe that the original phrase applies to the people. It is about time that the unskilled worker's pay be commensurate with the risks the job entails instead of being held down to $8.00 per hour by conservative politicians who speak insincerely about the value of our working force..

Posted on 10/08/2008 at 1:10:15 AM

 
Thanks, Lenora - I hope this gives people 2nd thoughts.

Posted on 10/07/2008 at 10:10:56 PM

 
You have some very good points, but coming from a military family, I find McCain's record on voting against benefits and medical care for those who served their country appalling.

Posted on 10/07/2008 at 6:10:03 PM

 
Good reporting!

Posted on 10/07/2008 at 5:10:31 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 11 of 11
 
Advertisment