Find » The Impact of the No Child Left Beh...

The Impact of the No Child Left Behind Act

By Samantha Wallachy, published Feb 08, 2006
Published Content: 1  Total Views: 0  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.1 of 5
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001, passed January 8, 2002 by President Bush’s administration, addresses educational reform. The law reflects four educational reform principles promoted by our President: stronger accountability for results, increased flexibility and local control (by states and local governments), expanded options for parents, and an emphasis on teaching methods that have been proven to work [Natriello p.2]. The reality of NCLB is that it acts as a smokescreen, designed to make people believe that the Bush administration has the educational systems' best interests at heart and intends to limit the federal government's control of our public schools. The true agenda of NCLB is to slyly gut the educational system of its remaining revenue and divert public tax dollars to other Bush agendas, all the while dipping federal government hands into the fates of schools nationwide. 

The 2004 education budget presented by Bush's administration requested $5 billion less in education spending for the first year then what was authorized by the NCLB act. Further, this budget is $100 million short of the 2003 budget and comes as the lowest increase in eight years. This poses the ultimate blow to the educational system. Chopping an already starved budget gives schools little hope to accommodate increasing numbers of school children or educational costs. It also diminishes the chances of “failing” schools obtaining promised funding entitlements under NCLB. Other blows to educational funding come from inaccurately publicized increases to special education spending, slashed funding to the Military Impact Aid (MIA) and from school vouchers designed for “school choice” programs. 

Takeaways
  • Demand NCLB results each year.
  • Consider NCLB options if your school district is failing in performance.
  • Stay informed as the guidelines change.
Resources
Comments
Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
Great points. Hopefully under Obama, this legislation will be reformed and less standardized-test based...We'll see. Thanks for the well-researched and well-constructed article. You should post more!

Posted on 11/06/2008 at 4:11:37 PM

 
thanks for the feedback!

Posted on 12/31/2006 at 11:12:00 PM

 
I'm a public high school teacher in the state that is currently ranked dead-last 50th in meeting educational needs of students K-grade12. My nickname for NCLB is ECLB (Every Child Left Behind) and it's no joke. This mandate is wrong on too many levels to even count! Great article, and written extremely well! Kudos!

Posted on 09/27/2006 at 5:09:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Advertisment