The Dominance of Cookie Cutter R&B Entertainers Hinders the Promotion of Bonafide Artists

Everyone Looks and Sounds like Beyonce

Anyone who knows me can tell you that when it comes to R&B music, specifically Soul/Neo-Soul music, I am an avid fan (as in short for fanatic). Regardless of the moniker bestowed upon this sub-category of R&B, this is music that I feel as I listen to it. If I listen to a
 particular CD ten years from now, for instance, Maxwell's "Urban Hang Suite," it automatically brings me back to that time in my life when I first heard it-and the magic of what I feel never goes away (but that's a different story for another day).

If anything, this music is like food for the soul (or at least my soul). Give me a whole heaping of Maxwell, with a dash of D'Angelo, spoon on a side of Jill Scott, sprinkle some Leela James, butter it with Angie Stone on top, and season well with some Musiqsoulchild, and watch me gorge on a musical feast! However, as I watch BET and listen to New York Radio (if you have not read my profile, I live in the wonderful, but very overpriced state of New York), I at first became bored, then annoyed and now disgusted by what I see and hear in R&B music today. For instance, within a two hour period, I heard Beyonce four times between two radio stations. However, when I try to hear a little Erykah Badu or Floetry, I am lucky to hear at least one their songs on the radio or see their videos during the entire day. When it comes to the ladies of R&B, there is a monotony of sound and appearance that is promoted on mainstream radio stations and television. Consequently, this overexposure of the same personalities leaves out the entertainers who possess real talent and individuality.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 3 of 3  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

It seems a lot of these "cookie cutter" artists today should have had their careers ended after one hit. Instead, their record labels are shoving follow-up singles down our throats by forcing the radio stations to put one or more follow-up single into heavy rotation and playing at least 5 times a day. These follow-up singles are far from being as good as their "one hit". There was a time when one-hit wonders accepted the fact that they were one-hit wonders, albeit reluctantly. They either continued recording under different monikers and scenarios, went on to other opportunities in the entertainment business, or left the entertainment business altogether and went on with their lives. Like I said, some of these "cookie-cutter" artists should only be one-hit wonders.

Posted on 01/05/2007 at 6:01:00 AM

Tamara, I enjoyed your article very much and fully sympathize with your protests. Just want to point out one thing--this has been going on since the 50s, at least(that was before my time, but I read a lot)..when a good-looking kid named Fabian became a pop singing star through "American Bandstand", although he couldn't sing. What artists had on their side back then were smaller record companies with no corporate sponsorship.Today we have the internet. It will always go on as long as there is a market for it. For more examples, google "C&C music factory"(a thin,pretty model replaced the lead singer in the music video) or Milli Vanilli (created by corporate--sued by real artists)..Thanks for the piece!

Posted on 01/04/2007 at 11:01:00 AM

As with all mainstream radio, media, videos and anything else it is all cookie cutters, mass produced dolls. You aren't alone in how you feel and it's not just R&B it's Pop, Rock, Rap, Hip Hop, Folk it's the whole shibang. I love the artists you mentioned and even a bit of Joss Stone in there with Nikka Costa and we have ourselves a party. I completely agree with you and I think it's a great article. Thank you!

Posted on 01/04/2007 at 8:01:00 AM

Comments 1 - 3 of 3