Find » Opinion/Editorial » New Year's Smoking Ban and Tobacco ...

New Year's Smoking Ban and Tobacco Taxes

By Michelle L Devon (Michy), published Jan 11, 2007
Published Content: 336  Total Views: 939,013  Favorited By: 517 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.4 of 5
New Year's Smoking Bans and Tobacco Taxes, by Michelle L Devon

Living in Texas, we are now seeing many signs popping up stating: New Taxes Effective January 1st - Stock Up Now!

Beginning January 1st, Texas residents will see an increase in tobacco taxes by nearly a dollar. Packs of cigarettes that already cost a ridiculous amount of money when compared to production costs will increase to over $5-6 per pack. Other tobacco products will be affected similarly, with chewing tobacco maxing out over $7 per can, making Texas the 10th highest tobacco taxed state in the nation.

While there are no bans on smoking sanctioned by the state, Texas does allow the individual municipalities to determine whether or not public facilities allow smoking. I live in Odessa, and the city has smoking regulations that require a public facility to declare whether their establishment is smoking, non-smoking, or both. If a facility decides to be both smoking and non smoking, special, and very expensive, air circulation and filtration systems to keep the smoking and the non smoking sections of the establishment separate must be installed. This is very cost prohibitive to most establishments, so many have decided to go all smoking or all non smoking, and in doing so, will potentially lose a large customer base either way they choose.

In our sister city, Midland, the municipal ban on smoking doesn't exist except for in government building, and many residents of Odessa often drive the 20 miles to Midland to dine out if they are smokers.

However, this article isn't really about cigarette taxes or banning smoking in public facilities and establishments. What I'd like to focus on is a different type of ban on smoking.

Several apartment complexes across America have instituted bans on smoking in the common grounds of the apartment, which most won't argue about too much, but a few apartments have taken the ban a bit farther, and they are now banning smoking inside the tenant's own unit.

New Year's Smoking Ban and Tobacco Taxes

Cigarette

Credit: Niels Timmer

Copyright: Niels Timmer

Takeaways
  • Smoking is a choice, not a protected status, and therefore, many believe it should be restricted or legislated.
  • Advocates against smoking bans believe banning smoking will lead to legislating other immoral behavior.
  • Should what a person does in their own home be able to be legislated?
Resources
  • Note: The author has included no links in this article. All links were added after publication.
Comments
Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
By telling apartment dwellers that they can no longer smoke in their apartments is an amendment to the lease the tenants signed and I don't see how they can stop a tenant from breaking their lease because of it. If the tenant does not agree to these terms, they should be able to break the lease, as it isn't what they originally signed. This stuff really bothers me. I don't smoke. But if you want to smoke in your own home, I believe that's your right. Everyone knows that cigarettes cause illness which leads to death. If you still want to do it, whatever. The government is making up all of these new laws in the name of safety and anti-terrorism and all of this other bullshit, not letting us be our own people, like we can't watch out for ourselves. I think of 1984 more and more every day.

Posted on 01/22/2007 at 4:01:00 PM

 
Legislating behavior in a home is pushing the envelope. I'm against smoking in public - heck, I'm against smoking - but I do not agree that government can legislate personal behavior in personal space.

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 8:01:00 AM

 
Ugh, this anti-smoking business is such crap. I understand the need to keep kids from getting hooked on cigarettes, but it's a freakin' personal choice to smoke. Every once and a while I go out and buy a pack of cigarettes because they're relaxing to smoke on a night out or sitting on the porch. I'm certainly not addicted to cigarettes, so why the hell should I be subjected to such ridiculous prices on an easily manufactured commodity?

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 8:01:00 AM

 
You bring up alot of excellent points here. I for one think the government is violating a persons constitutional rights when they begin to tell us what we can and cannot do in our homes. Can you say lawsuit? If you rent or lease, you are subject to more rules because it is technically someone elses property but other than that, the gov't is getting out of hand. This is why one of the most cherished and protected right is to privacy in our own homes. Now the day they want to make smoking illegal and quit making money on it themselves along with the businesses they champion big tabacco), well think about listening to what the government has to say on the subject. Until then, they are hypocrites, pure and simple.

Posted on 01/11/2007 at 12:01:00 PM

 
One of the things that scares me the most about government is how we are beginning to see small freedoms erode in the name of safety. We are told when and where we can kill ourselves (tobacco and alcohol), that we have to wear our seatbelts and helmets, etc etc. The people who support this type of legislation probably mean well, becuase they want to save the world from themselves, but the doors this opens for the government running our lives is very scary. What I do in my own home that is legal to be done just about everywhere else is my business and the government shouldn't be able to tell me any different. And no - I'm not smoker or a tobacco user, and never have been.

Posted on 01/11/2007 at 11:01:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Advertisment