Find » Opinion/Editorial » New Court Targets Federal Tax Monie...

New Court Targets Federal Tax Monies Not Delays

By Lary Holland, published Jan 03, 2007
Published Content: 25  Total Views: 4,096  Favorited By: 5 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.0 of 5
The Palladium-Item serving the Greater Richmond, IN area released an article Titled "New Court Targets Case Delays" on December 26, 2006 that I couldn't help but respectfully disagree with. The new court targets Federal Tax Monies Not Delays.

Asking questions and determining the facts are both essential skills necessary of our reporters to maintain an INFORMED public. An informed public is also essential in monitoring the size and actions of various governmental agencies, legislative bodies, and our judiciary. What we have in this article is the propaganda of big government that is preserving itself instead of solving problems. Why? Because it is more profitable to address symptoms than it is to resolve problems and each of our government officials wants some job security.

The number one question that was overlooked is why there is a "logjam of cases flowing through county courts." Why are there so many cases of family breakdown and crime in the County courts? Instead of managing higher caseloads, we need to look towards creating again an economic advantage to employment and marriage versus crime and separate welfare maintenance.

The fact that court officials hear cases more quickly, will only increase the caseloads and cause a substantial rise in Title IV-D welfare services. When federal funding is cut, the local tax payers will again be footing the bill directly from their property taxes instead of through their income withholding. This program currently is beneficial to the Counties because the higher the number of "participants" that some form of action was taken (whether positive or negative) the more Federal Tax Payer money the County will receive through the State participation grant (Title IV-D Welfare) until the federal funding is cut.

Takeaways
  • Provides Fiscal Year 2006 budget amounts: $4.2 Billion U.S. Tax Payer funds as appropriated by Congress
  • Explains that new courts will be biased because they directly benefit from their own personal decisions and oversight.
  • Exposes that Judicial offices should not be part of cooperatives that benefit financially from caseload.
Did You Know?
When Federal matching dollars are reduced a larger portion of local tax payer money will be necessary to foot the bill for welfare programs that include middle and upper class citizens that should not qualify for such programs.
Comments
Comment 1 of 1
 
 
This was an incredible editorial response to the Palladium-Item's article Mr. Holland. Exposing the use of our tax dollars is both necessary and important when government officials are quoted as not using a penny of tax payer money. I looked up Title IV-D of the Social Security Act and found that you are right on the money. The program is a free for all welfare spending program that simply rewards increased participation numbers and calls welfare by just another name.

Posted on 01/04/2007 at 7:01:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comment 1 of 1
 
Advertisment