Good Rex, Bad Rex, and the Chicago Bears

Team Heads into the NFC Playoffs Unsure of Which Rex Grossman Will Show Up at QB

"We'll never make it," Chicago Bears fans can be heard doing their best collective Glum. "Weeeeee're doooooooooomed." Doomed in the upcoming NFC playoffs, that is.

You wouldn't know it from such a pessimistic tone but last Sunday this team wrapped up one of the better regular seasons in Chicago Bears history. A 13-3 record. A first round bye with home field advantage throughout the playoffs. Seven Pro Bowlers.
 A legitimate Rookie of the Year candidate. The first Bear running back since Neal Anderson in 1989 and 1990 to post back-to-back 1,000-plus yard rushing seasons. The first Bear quarterback since Eric Kramer in 1997 to pass for 3,000-plus yards in a single season. And, considering that injury-prone Rex Grossman, the QB in question, actually started all 16 games without so much as a minor muscle strain (while setting a Chicago Bears single-season record of seven games at a 100-plus passer rating), all this gloom and doom might seem just a little bit misplaced. Indeed, Chicago Bears fans ought to be outright happy, right?

Wrong.

Momentum, that all-important intangible for so many gridiron analysts, is in scarce supply for the NFC playoff-bound Chicago Bears. The Monsters of the Midway, with quarterback Rex Grossman at the helm, are limping into the 2006 postseason as perhaps the worst 13-3 team in NFL history. After eking out narrow victories against the lowly Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the even lowlier Detroit Lions in weeks 15 and 16, respectively, the Bears followed up with an abysmal 26-7 loss to their archrival Green Bay Packers in the season finale.

Embarrassing.

Related information
  • Rex Grossman has earned the dual nicknames of "Good Rex" and "Bad Rex" because of his unpredictable performance on the field.
  • Chicago Bears fans, despite a 13-3 regular season and home field advantage , expect "one-and-done" in the NFC playoffs.
  • Grossman became the fist Bear quarterback to pass for over 3,000 yards in a single season since 1997.
 
Comments 1 - 6 of 6  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

I thought about taking him in a salary cap playoff league I'm in...for about ten seconds, just too big a gamble, even against a crippled patchwork Seattle secondary. Green Bay has a terrible secondary also.... I do think the Bears will win this week with a conservative game plan, trying to throw only when necessary.

Posted on 01/13/2007 at 10:01:00 AM

Oliver -- you're right. Sam -- If Rex can save that "tank" we all know is coming for, say, the preseason 2008, that'll be just fine with me!

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 4:01:00 PM

I have an interesting perspective on this, having watched the twin brothers Good Jake and Bad Jake Plummer in Denver. I would imagine Sexy Rexy will look good this weekend and then absolutely tank next weekend. Of course, this is assuming that all things are equal when they very clearly are not. Good luck, Chicago.

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 4:01:00 PM

My saying "average rex" is more in line with the old "XYZ team could make the playoffs with a win or a tie." We all know a "tie" is unlikely but the point being, anything but a loss. Likewise, the Bears will win with anything except "bad rex". Ehhh, whatever. . .

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 2:01:00 PM

Yes, the Bears could win with "average Rex" -- if they ever found him. Problem is, it seems, Rex is either really good or really bad.

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 2:01:00 PM

he was my fantasy QB this year and drove me crazy. I think the Bears can win with "average Rex" but ya never know. . .

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 9:01:00 AM

Comments 1 - 6 of 6