Electoral College Map May Look Very Different This Year

The electoral college map has been safely divided between red states and blue states since 2000. It has been easy to guess which states can be filled in blue and red, as Republicans and Democrats shore up their bases. For eight years, a state has usually been
Electoral College Map May Look Very Different This Year
 a reliable red or blue color in the electoral college map. But that concept is being changed this year, at least in the Republican category. In tomorrow's election, the electoral college map could have a decidedly different color scheme.

In the 2000 and 2004 elections, very few states changed from their designated position in the electoral college map. That favored Bush both times, since he won the same states that put him over 270 electoral votes. That helped sell the perception that a state is entirely red or blue, and that cannot be changed.

But in 2008, John McCain could be the candidate that changes all that, if only because he has lost the loyalty of so many red states.

Red states are supposed to vote for Republicans all the time, so goes the stereotype. But the electoral college map is showing a different color for an unprecedented large number of red states.

Barack Obama has substantial leads in the red states of Virginia, Iowa, New Mexico and Colorado, and perhaps in Florida as well. Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, Nevada, and even Montana and North Carolina are toss ups as well.

11 states that were supposed to stay red could all be blue on this year's electoral college map. Even if most of them stay red, Obama could still win early tomorrow night if just a few red states stay blue.

Unlike McCain, Obama has maintained safe leads in all of the traditional blue states. They all make up 252 electoral votes that are almost in the bag, although Pennsylvania is still heavily contended. If Obama maintains those leads, he needs only 18 votes from the 126 electoral votes up for grabs in the 11 red states to take the election.

Iowa, New Mexico and Virginia are already considered red states that are almost certainly going to turn blue for Obama. They combine for 25 electoral votes, which would put Obama over the top if nothing goes wrong in Pennsylvania or the other blue states.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 7 of 7  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Barack Obama will be the best President this nation will ever see Mark my words

Posted on 11/04/2008 at 4:11:30 PM

lol dalton...don't be discouraged because when it is all said and done HE WILL BE YOUR NEXT PRESIDENT. GOBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted on 11/04/2008 at 3:11:18 PM

OBAMA RULZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted on 11/04/2008 at 1:11:36 PM

obama sucks

Posted on 11/04/2008 at 12:11:54 PM

There have been 12 Presidential elections that were decided by less than a 1% margin; meaning if less than 1% of the voters in certain states had changed their mind to the other candidate the outcome of the entire election would have been different. https://www.msu.edu/~sheppa28/elections.html

Posted on 11/04/2008 at 7:11:05 AM

The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). & & & Every vote would be politically relevant and equal in presidential elections. & & & The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votesâ€"that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). & & & The bill is currently endorsed by 1,181 state legislators â€" 439 sponsors (in 47 states) and an additional 742 legislators who have cast recorded votes in favor of the bill. & & & The National Popular Vote bill has passed 21 state legislative chambers, including one house in Arkansas, Colorado, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, and both houses

Posted on 11/03/2008 at 5:11:48 PM

The major shortcoming of the current system of electing the President is that presidential candidates concentrate their attention on a handful of closely divided "battleground" states. In 2004 two-thirds of the visits and money were focused in just six states; 88% on 9 states, and 99% of the money went to just 16 states. Two-thirds of the states and people were merely spectators to the presidential election. Candidates have no reason to poll, visit, advertise, organize, campaign, or worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind. The reason for this is the winner-take-all rule enacted by 48 states, under which all of a state's electoral votes are awarded to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state. Another shortcoming of the current system is that a candidate can win the Presidency without winning the most popular votes nationwide. This has occurred in one of every 14 presidential elections. In the past six decades,

Posted on 11/03/2008 at 5:11:46 PM

Comments 1 - 7 of 7