Michelle Obama's Dress at Acceptance Speech Sets Stage for Spring Fashion Trends

Michelle Obama's dress selection at the presidential election acceptance speech is making waves in the fashion world, setting a new trend for the modern woman in a position of power. Her style is sophisticated but
Michelle Obama's Dress at Acceptance Speech Sets Stage for Spring Fashion Trends
 sassy, refined but down-to-earth, and notably different from Sarah Palin's and Cindy McCain's attention-grabbing wardrobes. Michelle Obama is now officially under the fashion radar, and the presidential events gave her a chance to welcome the crowds in an attractive red and black dress from designer Narciso Rodriguez, setting the stage for Spring 2009 fashion trends.

Michelle Obama's Dress Becomes a Fashion 'Do' for Spring 2009 Trends

Every First Lady comes under scrutiny for her style, taste in fashion and clothing selections for public appearances. The UK Times Online describes Michelle Obama as a 'new type of First Lady', a woman who isn't afraid to break conventional rules but steps boldly into the spotlight with confidence, a down-to-earth demeanor and a fearless fashion sense that makes her stand apart in many ways from former President's wives.

The now-famous red and black dress is fresh from the Spring 2009 collection from Narciso Rodriguez, a world-renown designer who has supplied Mrs. Obama with several distinct pieces over the course of the campaign. The dress is a simple but bold sleeveless, double-sash dress with a bright red smattering of color down the center; Mrs. Obama wore hers with a black cardigan during President Obama's acceptance speech on Tuesday night.

Michelle Obama - Politically-Influenced Fashion?

The Wall Street Journal reports that retail orders for Michelle Obama's dresses have increased by as much as 45% over the past year as the First Lady continued to make appearances in dozens of classy, simple and elegant dresses and suits that appealed to average-sized women with simple tastes. For some, the 'simple' tastes were a far cry from Sarah Palin's $150,000+ designer wardrobe, and analysts suggest that Mrs. Obama's selections may have had a political motive.

 
Comments 1 - 10 of 39 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

What a strange article.. Mrs. Obama's dress was indeed much more attention-grabbing than any other woman mentioned. It was really a black widow spider design. The message she was trying to convey was obvious. Why is the cost of her wardrobe not mentioned? Very strange..

Posted on 11/28/2008 at 8:11:32 AM

I think we should select our next president the old fashion way the founder's intended. All citizens voting for two candidates from the present members of Congress, one of which cannot be from their state. The one with the most votes is President, the runner up Vice President, regardless of party affiliation. The "winners" announced discreetly on the Senate floor. No more two year campaigns, and trivia about the candidates designers or wives' wardrobes, no more candidate marketing, two year campaigns, mud slinging, or excessive fundraisers which could pay off at least half the national debt. No more CNN, FOX and MSNBC inane banter. A dignified selection process, and how the founders intended.

Posted on 11/19/2008 at 1:11:22 PM

I don't know about the rest of you, but I found her dress that night totally bizarre... Yes, it may have been 'daring', but it sure seemed inappropriate for such a cataclysmic political even like that. Not only that, the way it was designed made her look pregnant! The red part actually actually seemed to *bulge* right around her stomach! I even heard a lady on talk radio comment that she looked a black widow spider!

Posted on 11/17/2008 at 2:11:12 PM

Thank you for your submission. Your article has been featured on the front page of AC. Please keep AC stocked with great front-page material. If you read high-quality content you believe is worthy of the front page, let us know by using this forum thread: http://forum.associatedcontent.com/forum.shtml?thread=25491

Posted on 11/17/2008 at 1:11:39 PM

Interesting article. Thanks for sharing.

Posted on 11/17/2008 at 11:11:55 AM

I agree with a few of the previous commenters. While I think this is a well-written article, it frustrates me that the media is so obsessed with what female politicians and figureheads are wearing. I am so tired of reading about what Sarah Palin, Hillary Clinton, and Michelle Obama are wearing: I want to read about what they THINK, not what they cover their backs with. You did an excellent job writing this article and used excellent citations, but I really wish we could move away from viewing women as mannequins and instead try to view them as people.

Posted on 11/17/2008 at 10:11:36 AM

I don't know about her taste in clothing. Her hubby dresses well, but I still think she could use some advisors. Sorry if you all hate that, but she still needs some work.

Posted on 11/17/2008 at 10:11:34 AM

Congrats on being featured twice in one day!

Posted on 11/17/2008 at 7:11:55 AM

Good article. I enjoyed the read. Thanks.

Posted on 11/16/2008 at 8:11:40 PM

You put that "Michelle Obama's dress selection at the presidential election acceptance speech is making waves in the fashion world, setting a new trend for the modern woman in a position of power. " I'm just curious as to what her "position of power" is. She's the First Lady - it's nothing more than a title; it implies no power whatsoever. Unless I've missed something - she doesn't really have any "power." And I'm glad she doesn't - not because I think she's incapable - but because I'm concerned that out of everything people could pick to talk about her, they talk about her clothes. If I was someone who held a "position of power" then I would want people to be concerned with the issues I was speaking about or the events or whatever that I was organizing, or things I was participating in - not what I'm wearing.

Posted on 11/16/2008 at 6:11:21 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 39 Next >>