Military Recruiters Stalked and Harassed Me for Taking a Picture

My Constitutional Right as an Independent Journalist to Take Pictures on Public Property was Infringed.

By ChristianPeper, published Jan 11, 2007
Published Content: 23  Total Views: 41,643  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Rating: 2.0 of 5
My name is Christian Peper and I was stalked and harassed by military recruiters for taking a picture on public property. At approximately 5:17 PM on Wednesday, January 10, 2007 I, Christian Peper, took a picture of the military recruiting station located nearest to the Office Depot at 4061 Lindell Avenue, St Louis, Missouri, 63108. The nearest cross street is Sarah St. The army recruiting station is located in a store front close to the Office Depot (where I purchased batteries for my digital camera at approximately 5:08PM) and a fast food Mexican restaurant and several other storefronts.

The first picture I took was across the street from the recruitment center. I then began to cross the street approaching the recruitment center from the front. I was still standing on a public street named Lindell (not even on the sidewalk) when I took the second picture. As I took the second picture a black male dressed in military uniform (seen in the posted picture) had just exited the recruitment center. I did not set foot on the sidewalk in front of the recruitment center. At no time was I close to the military recruiting center nor did I act in any threatening way.

I walked left, towards where my car was parked. He followed me asking why I took the pictures. He repeatedly asked while I took the pictures while he was following me. As I entered the area where my car was parked in the parking lot in front of Office Depot I saw a second man dressed in a military uniform. As I came within about 20 feet of where my car was parked I saw a third man dressed in a military uniform following me.

Military Recruiters Stalked and Harassed Me for Taking a Picture

The man in the photo violated my constitutional rights.

Credit: Christian Peper

Copyright: Christian Peper

Takeaways
  • Circulate this article widely.
Did You Know?
The military has no police authority over private citizens but because of the scam known as the "War on Terrorism" they get away with anything. My constitutional right as an independent journalist to take pictures on public property was infringed.
Resources
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 29
Next >>
 
You mention the War on Terrorism as an excuse for your supposed harrassment. The way I see it those recruiters were merely trying to idtenify an unknown man taking pictures of one of the few places the general public can access the mlitary. Recruiting stations aound this country have been scenes of violence. If you have watched the news at all recently you can see a prime example of that. Unfourtunately that is only one in a long line of violent acts against miltary recruiters. While I think that it is a shame that you feel your rights have been infringed upon I am going to have side with the recruiters on this one. How are they supposed to know what your intent was. As it is you have yet to state what you were doing taking pictures there in the first place.

Posted on 03/10/2008 at 5:03:09 PM

 
Your article leaves me wondering, why were you taking the pictures to begin with?

Posted on 10/17/2007 at 12:10:00 PM

 
I gotta give you your props for your comment "I will not respond to insults. Your insults speak volumes about your character." What about your insulting all the soldiers in this piece and your one about US troops being cowards? Talk about speaking volumes! You're the one that started this hornet's nest. Don't blame me if your mouth keeps overloading your ass and you have to defend yourself from my insults. You're just lucky insulting you is the most I can do legally. Let's review: You toss out insults at those who cannot defend themselves, esp. those selfless enuff to risk their lives for our safety, I'm gonna jump dead in yur shit. Got it????

Posted on 08/29/2007 at 9:08:00 AM

 
Mr. Jim Clayton: I will not respond to insults. Your insults speak volumes about your character. I am not a "sissy", just an American that cares about freedom and the constitution.

Posted on 08/28/2007 at 4:08:00 PM

 
Hey Christian, are you a gurl, or just a sissy? Your headline says it all - "Military Recruiters Stalked and Harassed Me for Taking a Picture." So asking what you are doing and why constitutes stalking and/or harassment? I think you are playin' fast and loose with the dictionary there Christian. And yes, I can assure you you were reported to higher authorities. Why? Because, how do those inside the recruitment office know what your intentions were? They are required by their oath to defend the US and report suspicious behavior. Noe the FBI is onto ya. I'll bet your FBI file is purty thick, just like your head.

Posted on 08/27/2007 at 8:08:00 AM

 
You did nothing wrong,since no one laid a hand on you the military { assuming your story is factual] personnel did nothing wrong.That makes it a nonevent and mentioning the episode has little or nothing to do with your postulates.However I do agree that we are losing personal freedoms and dangerously approaching a subvert of our diminishing democracy.

Posted on 08/17/2007 at 8:08:00 PM

 
Geez, you people are both cruel and evil. I get some negatives on Christian from this article, but most of you sound even worse. Maybe you're just affected by your emotions, but many of you sound like absolutely terrible people. I hope you can step back and take a look at how you sound.

Posted on 01/14/2007 at 2:01:00 AM

 
Never mind, Daniel said it better.

Posted on 01/13/2007 at 1:01:00 PM

 
Sorry Judy - that's a leap I cannot make: from a recruiter asking a question to fear that explosives brought down the Twin Towers. I would never allow myself to dwell in the requisite paranoia that would entertain such a thought process.

Posted on 01/13/2007 at 9:01:00 AM

 
Who was stalking who? I do not understand why you could not have handled this more professionally. You were refusing to answer them, and attempting to run. Suspicious behavior usually does cause a bit of concern, and they acted accordingly.

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 12:01:00 PM

 
The military is OUR military... Believing the military can do no wrong is what leads to fascism. That being said, it seems you may have provoked this result on purpose. I do agree that just because someone wears the uniform of a soldier doesn't mean they have any right to intimidate anyone. You can't use the "war on terror" as a blanket excuse to question a citizen doing something completely legal. But if what you were doing was harmless, you could have explained yourself.

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 9:01:00 AM

 
What a piece of complete garbage. If you don't agree with the War on Terror, fine, but don't take it out on the military. It's sad that so many have did for your freedom. What a pathetic piece.

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 9:01:00 AM

 
Scott S. said: "The right to photograpg is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution." "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,or of the press; or the right of the people peacably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." That's it! No word of cameras anywhere. To Timothy Sexton: While I often agree with you, and anyone who has read me knows I'm no fan of Bush, there's a difference between using the Constitution to defend yourself when needed and to use it as a vehicle for promotion of propaganda. You're wrong this time!

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 9:01:00 AM

 
Taking a picture isn't wrong, but running away without explanation would seem very suspicious - especially if you're a professional journalist. Why not answer the man? Even though it was a public place and you had a right to be there taking a picture, being rude and drawing more suspicion by not responding wasn't appropriate either. After you didn't answer when spoken to you really looked questionable, and writing down your license plate number was the only way to locate you should a problem occur. He had a right to ask, you had a right to ignore him, and he had a right to record your license plate number. A professional journalist would have responded politely and professionally, but you ignored him.

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 8:01:00 AM

 
Furthermore, the rights of the photographer DOES NOT include taking pictures of military bases. Anyone who is a real photographer (unlike you claiming to be) is aware of the laws. Since you don't know, download this>> http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf >> and I quote "commanders of military institutions CAN prohibit photographs of specific areas if they deem necessary." So once again, quit begging to be a victim, pull up your pants and be a man. And while you're at it, quit making up "rights" you think you have without knowing what you're talking about.

Posted on 01/12/2007 at 7:01:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 29
Next >>
Most Commented On