Find » Society » History » "Sacrifice" is Necessary to Win a W...

"Sacrifice" is Necessary to Win a War

Armed Conflicts Cannot Be Fought "On the Cheap"

By Jim Stillman, published Jan 25, 2007
Published Content: 170  Total Views: 106,814  Favorited By: 48 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.7 of 5
The last two major conflicts in which the United States was a combatant ended (or will end) poorly because shared and universal sacrifice was not demanded (or even suggested) by the government.

I was six years old when the United States was attacked by Japan on December 7th, 1941. On the following day, pursuant to a treaty between Germany and Japan, the former declared war against this country. World War II differed from the Vietnam conflict or the two wars in Iraq in that our country was attacked and clearly forced into war. It was not an elective conflict or a preemptive war; we were attacked, our citizens were killed by a foreign nation and it was absolutely clear to the American public that going to war was necessary. Those people who, on December 6th were isolationist or had doubts about becoming involved in what was, to many, a European conflict or a south-east Asian matter, rushed to enlist in the armed services and in other ways resolved to do his or her part in safeguarding our freedoms.

The president spoke often of the need for sacrifice by everyone. With able-bodied men entering the service, jobs that were previously performed by men were taken by women. Rosie the Riveter was born. Women were enlisting in the Women's Arms Corp (WAC), Women Accepted for Voluntary Emergency Service (WAVES) and an greatly expanded Nurse Corp.

Comments
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
Note to all, President Bush has stated that the American people ARE making sacrifices. He said that watching the nightly news caused a sense of insecurity and the loss of peace of mind was a major sacrifice. Unbelievable!

Posted on 03/11/2007 at 2:03:00 PM

 
Jim, you make some very good points...true war demands sacrifice. Your WWII examples point that out. The thing about the wars since then is that they are more about maintaining economic and/or political empire than about full national struggle. Of course, that doesn't mean that these "wars" don't inovolve sacrifice...just ask the Iraqi civilians...

Posted on 01/26/2007 at 6:01:00 PM

 
Bravo - if I knew how to say - this is exactly what I would've said. The groundwork for this article explains the foundation upon which I reached the same conclusion. If your suggstions were implemented - I would be SO PROUD to be American! Great Work!

Posted on 01/26/2007 at 4:01:00 PM

 
Great article Jim. I had heard about the rationing system, but didn't know exactly how it worked. Thanks for the history lesson. You make some very valid points and unlike many writers, myself included, you provide answers to the problems facing the nation. A welcome change. I think that getting the people at home involved, though, won't work because they don't have to be involved. Like you said, who needs an SUV to trek to the grocery store? They do it because they can. We have moved 60 years forwrd since WW II and can now manufacture synthetic goods to replace those once made only naturally. If memory serves, LBJ was a Democrat and the problems he left went on to Haunt Nixon, a Republican. You're right, Bush should have learned from LBJ's mistakes. He didn't and we have to make the best of it. 2008 is going to be interesting.

Posted on 01/26/2007 at 3:01:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Advertisment