Political Correctness Clashes with Christmas - Again

And Other New "Intolerances for the Sake of Tolerance"

Well, it looks like the "PC" Grinch is declaring war on Christmas once again. This Christmas season, The American Humanist Association has plastered negative ads about God on metro buses in Washington DC. The "Godless Holiday Campaign" ad states: "Why believe in a god? Just be good for
 goodness sake." The slogan will appear on Washington, D.C., buses through the month of December, with a picture of a lady in a Santa costume. The AHA is using the reason that agnostics and atheists are lonely during the holidays.

Lots of people are lonely during the holidays, even religious people. Surely there is another way to help those who have no religious affiliation besides insulting those who do.

Within the last decade or so, children have been incorrectly prohibited from singing Christmas songs (as well as songs at other times of year) with the word "God" or "Christ" even though their whole class has been told to "pick whatever song they want". Choirs have refrained from singing Christmas carols that mention the Christ child. Wal-Mart, Target and other stores have refused to use the word "Christmas" and then, in the face of boycotts, reclaimed the word. This year, Costco (a membership retail chain with over 520 stores) is refusing to use the word because it "may insult those who don't observe Christmas".

Well, how about the people that DO observe Christmas? Don't they have the right to be insulted? Plus, at the cost of not mentioning Christmas, in order to appear "unbiased", many of these stores have done away with mentioning Hanukkah, too.

This is all due to a gross misunderstanding of the phrase "separation of church and state" which doesn't even exist in the First Amendment but in the decisions of renegade judges since the 1950's who have been convincing people of its new meaning. And many believe what they hear.

Related information
  • Source links given at end of text.
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 79 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

:)

Posted on 02/01/2009 at 12:02:21 PM

Good article. Advertising on Metro is so cheap that I'd recommend it even as a venue for person-to-person ads, but yes, I think it's time for Christians at least to remind people that Christian-phobia is as bad as phobias of the other religions.

Posted on 01/17/2009 at 7:01:50 PM

On another note, I've searched the Constitution and can find no place in the Bill of Rights (or elsewhere for that matter) where it states that citizens shall have the right "not to be offended". Isn't that one of the principles of Free Speech, where I can say what I want the way I want? So long as I don't slander, libel, or actually threaten anyone, how can the government restrict my rights? If you are offended or otherwise disagree, you likewise have the right to say so and exactly why, and in the way you wish. And while I might feel your opinions are wrong-headed, I'll be the first to protest if someone tells you that you can't voice your thoughts. I think it's time for people to stand up for what they believe in once again, and get rid of this "Political Correctness" idiocy.

Posted on 12/14/2008 at 10:12:51 AM

In hindsight, perhaps that phrasing was misfortunate, for the school board promptly took the more negative interpretation and banned everything. It is these religious cases and others like it in the similar arenas of race, gender and orientation that are the basis for Politically Correctness today. So who's to blame? If you did not speak out against these injustices, how can you justify complaining about their outcome? Is it only because it is your perceived rights that are being infringed upon this time? ps - Merry Christmas, Happy Hannuka, Blessed Yule, and all the rest.

Posted on 12/14/2008 at 9:12:37 AM

Sheryl - While I agree with your assessment that PC-ism is out of control, I have to remind you that, as you state, a number of Christian religious leaders were instrumental in inadvertently championing this movement. I recall a case years ago (and not an isolated one) wherein a group of high school students were prohibited from wearing their Wiccan pentacles. At the time, most evangelical TV ministries were supportive of this prohibition, falsely identifying any alternative theistic emblems as being a demonic sign. Regardless of what people "thought", there wasn't a word of protest from any mainstream Christian denominations defending the kid's viewpoint. In due course, the courts instructed the school board that they cannot prohibit one religious symbol without prohibiting them all.

Posted on 12/14/2008 at 9:12:32 AM

I get mad every time I read something like this.. The US is turning into China...

Posted on 12/14/2008 at 2:12:20 AM

Great! You know the Heck with it all. Christians founded this country which MANY seem to forget. I don't picket Pagan. Jewish, Muslim or any other religous holiday of anyones. MERRY CHRISTMAS< MERRY CHRISTMAS< MERRY CHRISTMAS, and whoever doesn't like it TOUGH! Enough is Enough!

Posted on 12/12/2008 at 6:12:38 PM

Excellent article. I keep coming back to it, and every time I read it, it frustrates me more to see how the silent majority is cowering to the vociferous minority. Arghh!

Posted on 12/08/2008 at 11:12:19 PM

We just went out to get an ACLU approved religion-neutral "holiday tree." We have one or two quasi-religious ornaments to put on it. Still, I wonder if we can be sued for inapproprate holiday tree symbolism? Is it okay to put a big star on the top? Would a little star be better?

Posted on 12/07/2008 at 5:12:40 PM

Sorry, that was supposed to say. . .liberal judicial system DON"T misconstrue the intended meaning and enforce even more "politically correct" INTOLERANCE!

Posted on 12/07/2008 at 12:12:59 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 79 Next >>