Ford, GM, and Chrysler - Can the Big Three Be Saved Without Massive Taxpayer Bailouts?

How Simplifying the Crisis Suggests a Way to Save Ford, GM, and Chrysler Without a Bailout

Ford, GM, and Chrysler plead for billions in taxpayer bailout

IHT reported the "Big Three" automakers' CEOs are in Washington pleading for a $36 billion taxpayer bailout. A few weeks earlier Ford, GM and Chrysler asked for "just" a $25 billion bailout, so even a $36 billion bailout may not be enough. Can
 Ford, GM, and Chrysler be saved without such massive taxpayer bailouts?

Why Ford, GM, and Chrysler want a taxpayer bailout

When problems become too complex for readily seen solutions, simplifying can help an otherwise impossibly complex situation. Simplifying, Ford, GM, and Chrysler's crisis has two parts. First, the Big Three's costs aren't competitive due to concessions made to the UAW in better times. Second, with the current recession, dropping demand for vehicles cannot support Ford, GM, and Chrysler.

Outright failure of Ford, GM, and Chrysler would cost millions of jobs. Bankruptcy restructuring would spook potential customers afraid to lose warranty coverage. Ford, GM and Chrysler are already seen as less likely to survive and honor their warranties than Honda or Toyota, who also have better reputations for quality and fuel-efficiency.

A taxpayer bailout for Ford, GM, and Chrysler ignores these underlying problems. More and more bailouts would be needed to support the Big Three until the economy recovers, probably after 2 or more years and hundreds of billions in additional taxpayer bailouts.

A solution for Ford, GM, and Chrysler without taxpayer bailouts

Instead, we could use a two-pronged approach. First, require UAW give up benefits beyond what most Americans have (e.g. nearly free healthcare) which would anyway be lost should Ford, GM, and Chrysler fail. In return, have Ford, GM, and Chrysler guarantee a portion of any profits as bonuses independent of salary, benefiting lower-paid workers more than highly-paid ones.

Having PBGC take on the cost of Ford, GM, and Chrysler's retiree healthcare would reduce the impact on current retirees while minimizing taxpayers cost compared to outright failure of the Big Three or continuous bailout packages.

Related information
  • Ford, GM, & Chrysler are pleading for billions in taxpayer bailouts which may not solve the problem.
  • A properly structured tax deduction could help consumers help the Big Three out of their crisis.
  • Replacing UAW benefits with a portion of Big Three profits could improve Detroit's cost structure.
 
Comments 1 - 9 of 9  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Nowhere did I say anyone should not buy Ford vehicles. You may be referring to a separate article written by someone else, and which is linked to as being related. If possible, I'd prefer all three of these companies thrive.

Posted on 04/26/2009 at 4:04:54 PM

I love how GM and Chrysler are the two companies who asked for bailouts, this article states that all there requested bailouts, and then it states why you should not buy some ford vehicles.. I do not believe that this article is very accurate, and is just a gimic to sale more GM and Chrysler vehicles.

Posted on 04/26/2009 at 9:04:58 AM

interesting article. I love my Suburban, though.

Posted on 03/31/2009 at 2:03:14 PM

You know, I just realized I had never read any of your articles. Anyway, here I am. I like this one. Some good solutions. I wish the government would listen.

Posted on 01/12/2009 at 6:01:39 PM

:)

Posted on 12/05/2008 at 1:12:13 PM

GM is in the worst shape and that is sad... it appears they have no plan b at all

Posted on 12/03/2008 at 11:12:47 PM

very nice article

Posted on 12/03/2008 at 7:12:27 PM

Great work!

Posted on 12/03/2008 at 6:12:44 PM

I certainly think they need to make more fuel efficent cars. That would have to help their bottom line! Very interesting article.

Posted on 12/03/2008 at 3:12:57 PM

Comments 1 - 9 of 9