Find » Arts & Entertainment » Books » Book Review: Living with Arthritis:...

Book Review: Living with Arthritis: Everything You Need to Know by John Marcus Thompson

By DrDevience, published Jan 30, 2007
Published Content: 391  Total Views: 346,637  Favorited By: 115 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.1 of 5
Depending on which Doctor you ask, I have either Rheumatoid Arthritis or Lupus. The symptoms are extremely similar for both...and the results are not far off each other either. They are both autoimmune diseases and are treated with the same drugs, so I don't sweat the discrepancy at all. As a result though, I find myself pouring over Internet sites and various local bookstores for more info on both. I've skimmed many a book and Living With Arthritis: Everything You Need to Know caught my attention enough to go ahead and purchase.

Living With Arthritis is written by a Rheumatologist named John Marcus Thompson. What he promises in the forward is to tell you things that your own doctor probably won't. That's how he nabbed me. I want to know it all. I want to know what to expect both worst case and best case. Unfortunately, Thompson didn't really deliver as promised. I learned little new, and got some conflicting info from this book... but I'm getting ahead of myself.

Thompson covers all the various forms of Arthritic ailments, both inflammatory and non-inflammatory. He tries to cover as much ground as possible on what you can expect to happen with each, various symptoms, but all he manages to do in many instances is talk himself in circles, never really nailing himself down to an answer. This is very frustrating. Granted, I may know more than most already with the amount of time I've spent scouring the web so perhaps that's why he had no new info for me... but I don't really think that's it at all... he just seems to skim the surface.

Book Review: Living with Arthritis: Everything You Need to Know by John Marcus Thompson

Living With Arthritis: Everything You Need to Know

Credit: John Marcus Thompson

Copyright: John Marcus Thompson

Takeaways
  • Some of the information does not jive with other sources
  • Too much repetition on the medications
  • Very easy writing style
Comments
Comment 1 of 1
 
 
Lori, Be easy on the guy. The diagnosis of Lupus has changed over the years and become more inclusive. It used to be called the "great imitator" for obvious reasons. One problem is with your validating critierion. No two people will agree on the diagnosis each person. Hence the debate over the ANA. When you say it had a false negative, what are you using for the criterion to make the definitive diagnosis. There are people who make their livings diagnosing everything as L. E. To them, ther ANA test misses a lot of cases. The problem is that other people would not agree that those are 'true' cases. So, depending on who makes the diagnosis, the ANA test is either highly valid and reasonably sensitive, or it sucks. It's not my field, but if I had a gun to my head and I would be forced to say what I thought about it, I would say it is pretty good and acceptably sensitive (low percentage of false negatives). As there is no definitive treatment, and no definitive way to diagnose, you will

Posted on 01/31/2007 at 12:01:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comment 1 of 1
 
Advertisment