Big 3 Bailout Becomes Big 2 Bailout for the Short-Term

Bush Administration Refuses to Budge

Extremely unpopular or not, Congress is determined to go through with the Big 3 Bailout. But - now - so is the White House. But it is for far less money and for just two of the automobile manufacturers. Reuters has reported that leading Democrats in
Big 3 Bailout Becomes Big 2 Bailout for the Short-Term
Date: December 6, 2008
Washington, DC
United States of America
 Congress have negotiated a deal with White House officials to loan two of the Big 3 Detroit automarkers as much as $15 billion dollars, less than half of what the Big 3 asked for when they came before Congress on Thursday and Friday (December 4,5).

Sources told the Reuters that the money was expected to be a short-term loan until the Democrats move in in force on January 20, 2009. Advocates and opponents alike describe the deal as stopgap at best, solving nothing, and putting more pressure on the flailing American economy in the long run by demanding more loans and bailouts in the future.

Ford CEO Alan Mulally told Congress that his corporation was not in need of federal assistance at the moment.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who has stridently insisted upon monies loaned to the auto companies come from the $700 billion bailout money given the U. S. Treasury in September, sidelined her efforts Friday when it became clear that the Bush administration was refusing to budge on the issue. Instead, monies approved for a $25 Energy Department loan that was set up to help auto companies meet fuel-efficiency standards, the option promoted by the White House, will be used.

Congressman John Dingell (D-MI) is optimistic, stating that it was a "good beginning." He also said that "next year we will work with President-Elect Obama for a permanent solution."

Both Speaker Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said they expected a vote on the proposed measure next week.

 
Comments 1 - 8 of 8  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Well, more power to Ford, I guess, but I'm really sick of the attitude of entitlement of big corporations in America. The senate committees huf and blow for the cameras and still give these jackasses all the tax cuts they want, and STILL they need extra help because they make a product nobody wants and run their companies into the ground while walking away with huge personal gains. :( Where did integrity go? Was it ever there?

Posted on 12/09/2008 at 11:12:48 PM

:^)

Posted on 12/08/2008 at 5:12:09 AM

We've been operating in a Democratic socialist atmosphere since the first time the government subsidized anything, Your name. Over a hundred years? Idiot reactionaries have made socialism and term to be feared. They still do. And they have been living with socialism all their lives, selectively ignoring it. The free market would collapse into the true anarchy that it is without government oversight and regulation. Black markets, bazaars, flea markets, etc., will still exist for those who want the "unrestricted" free market, but companies and corporations need oversight for the common good. We live in a democratic socialist nation (maybe not as much of one as Sweden, but one nonetheless), whether people like it or not. And most people like it, except when something annoys them, then they start looking for a buzz word to attack with. George Bush set up his government like a Nazi, so he got compared to Hitler. Obama is talking commonality, so they drag out socialism.

Posted on 12/07/2008 at 7:12:10 AM

:)

Posted on 12/07/2008 at 7:12:44 AM

Good article. I think any conclusion about the 700 billion dollar bailout is premature. For me personally, there was no choice in the 2008 elections. I could not vote for a political party that advocated letting the world economy collapse. The Conservative philosophy of doing nothing is unacceptable. At least the Democrats are trying to revive the economy. Your other point about jobs is very good. I don't understand how the conservatives could give away our hard earned tax dollars to companies that take away our jobs and move manufacturing centers overseas. Yet those same conservatives balk at any tax money used to help the needy. Apparently, they believe the government should help those who are wealthy and ignore the rest of the population. Tax cuts and tax incentives are give-a-ways because they increase the national debt!

Posted on 12/07/2008 at 3:12:49 AM

Ford better take the money.

Posted on 12/06/2008 at 11:12:21 PM

Hey Saul, Guess what! My pet groundhog saw his shadow today so he went back into his den-six more weeks of the Bush Administration BS is what we have to look forward to but then.......

Posted on 12/06/2008 at 8:12:15 PM

Its a shame that Washington had no problem tossing money at banks after the banks themselves cause their own failure, and yet refuses to help out one of the nations largest employers of middle and lower class workers. Great article

Posted on 12/06/2008 at 2:12:32 PM

Comments 1 - 8 of 8