Find » Opinion/Editorial » A Gentle Parent's View of Corporal ...

A Gentle Parent's View of Corporal Punishment - Calling Spanking Out for What it Is

By Kristina B, published Feb 01, 2007
Published Content: 27  Total Views: 11,401  Favorited By: 11 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.8 of 5
People call it spanking, popping, smacking, paddling and a number of other things that often make it sound less serious than it really is. I believe it's an assault. It is violence against our young; some of the most vulnerable beings on the planet. What's worse is that it is violence inflicted on children by the very people that are supposed to protect and cherish them.

I do not look at spanking as simply another choice a parent can make, but rather as a violation of the human rights of a child. Is it acceptable to hit your spouse or partner because they have angered you? Is it appropriate to strike a co-worker because they have done something you don't approve of? Of course it isn't, and if you were to try it I suspect the police would promptly make an appearance to discuss it with you. Animals are even protected from violence, and rightly so, but it leaves me wondering why we as a society have left our children vulnerable to it.

Children need to be able to trust their parents, and I feel that corporal punishments do not help build that kind of bond. I do not trust people that hurt and frighten me. Spanking is meant to hurt and frighten. I have heard many parents say they never actually hurt their child when giving a spanking. "We don't hit hard enough to hurt them. It's just enough to get their attention." they explain. If we really examine the situation we can see that the attention a parent is getting from a spanking is from fear. I think most of us know that hitting people hurts. Perhaps there are varying degrees of pain depending on the individual hit, but spankings depend on pain and the fear of future pain in the form of more spankings or they wouldn't be a (so called) effective tool for disciplining children. Parents know that the child won't want to experience another spanking, and they hope that the fear of another spanking will cause them to behave. This is all rooted in fear. We don't change our behavior in order to avoid comfortable and enjoyable things, after all. The motivation a spanked child has for changing their behavior is the fear of pain rather than the desire to do what is right because they understand why something is right.

A Gentle Parent's View of Corporal Punishment - Calling Spanking Out for What it Is

Although it strikes many as antithetical, a hug can go a long way to calming stormy tempers and avoiding aggressive discipline.

Credit: Kristi Brewington

Copyright: Kristi Brewington

Takeaways
  • Children learn what they live
  • Spanking erodes trust
  • Corporal punishment does not give information about better behavior
Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 67
Next >>
 
My personal opinion on this. My parents spanked me and my parents were spanked, and I think that those two generations are a lot better off than the generation that is being raised as we speak. Spanking is not intended to literally bring fear into a child. It is to teach a child that when they do something wrong, there are consequences. And as the child grows and understands that concept, you can start taking away spankings, by taking away things that they love. I have two toddlers and I have tried to just put them into time out and just tell them that I am not happy with them, and it doesnt always work. They throw tantrums and dont understand that I am unhappy with them, or that what they are doing is wrong. So I went back to what my parents and the parents before them did, my two toddlers have learned so much. They are a lot more behaved. And we still have our fun and they know that I love them. We still hug and love on each other and play together. A 2 year old is not well equipped

Posted on 11/15/2008 at 1:11:19 PM

 
Spare the rod wasn't meant to be taken literally, like most passages of the Bible. It was likely referring to the sort of rod by which Shepherd's guide their sheep. The rod is tall so the sheep can see it and follow the lead of the shepherd. It's about leading by example and setting guidelines for your kids, not hitting them.

Posted on 09/03/2007 at 7:09:00 PM

 
This is the silliest article I ever read! I believe that corporal punishment should be brought back to the public school systems, as I also believe the pledge of alliegiance should be brought back in schools as well. You and people like you think that spanking is not discipline when God himself said it was so "Spare the rod, spoil the child". I believe that children most of all need more discipline in school these days, especially with the drug problem becoming worse, kids killing kids, K-I-D-S killing teachers. But hell if 50 cent can tell some kid in his lyrics that killing his teacher is cool we are all fucked. My bad he already has! ask them what God says, and I bet you couldn't find a single kid in a public school in New York, Philly, Baltimore that knows what you are even talking about. I am not talking about beating your kids but a spanking is something totally different.

Posted on 06/16/2007 at 5:06:00 PM

 
calling it what it is: Big person Bullies a Little person Because he/she Can.

Posted on 05/28/2007 at 12:05:00 AM

 
i think that if a parent spanks their child is less likely to come to them and admit things they've done wrong. it's about trust, and a child wouldn't trust a person who would resort to hitting them when they get frustrated.

Posted on 03/19/2007 at 6:03:00 PM

 
Another insult, what a surprise. I'm unintelligent because you come off as rude to me and because I don't believe in spanking. *Yawn* All right, sure. If you say so.

Posted on 02/21/2007 at 1:02:00 PM

 
Heather- I didn't even intend to have a squabble with you in the first place. You have taken offense to everything I have said, and rediculasly went half cocked over a simple religious question. Everyone interprets things differently. However, I think that I left enough information to at least let you know that I didn't INTEND to offend you. I just don't think you're intelligent enough to carry on a civil conversation without getting offended all the time, so, I won't bother with your time.

Posted on 02/21/2007 at 8:02:00 AM

 
Now if you want to continue debating please msg me privately, so that we can remove this argument from Kristina's article. Continuing to debate beyond the subject of the article is extremely rude and disrespectful to her, and I'm not going to engage you here anymore. If you want to talk religion or how people should or shouldn't behave, do it in a private message to me. It's not fair to Kristina to have the conversation on her well-written spanking article consist of only a personal squabble between the two of us.

Posted on 02/19/2007 at 10:02:00 PM

 
you when you can be civil, and I am more than happy to explain the religion to you when you stop accusing me of being overly-sensitive (which is insensitive). FYI: The proper response to "That offends me" would be to apologize politely and say "That was not my intent," rather than tell someone that you think they have a screw loose. And telling someone to slow down and read more carefully is condescending. That we continue to disagree and that your comments aren't offensive do NOT necessarily mean that I am not reading carefully. They do, however, mean that you aren't expressing yourself clearly enough and aren't being particularly tactful in your wording. Instead of saying "You have a screw loose," saying "I don't understand why you were offended, please explain" would have been better.

Posted on 02/19/2007 at 10:02:00 PM

 
I explained already the problem with the wording; even my husband, a Christian, agreed it was not tactful before I even mentioned my opinion on the matter. If you want to know about the pagan religion, ask in a respectful way. I'm sorry that you cannot understand why the statement 'I want to know -why people are pagans-' is problematic, but I promise you that asking what rather than why will always result in a less defensive response. I didn't take the question as an insult; I only expressed concerns about the wording. I took the 'screw loose' and 'something wrong' comments as insults, however, and I don't see how anyone wouldn't. I'll thank you not to tell me how I should or shouldn't be. Talking to me like I'm stupid, using capitol letters and spacing things out, as if you have to spell it out slowly so that my inferior mind will comprehend you is not very respectful, and asking 'Can you figure THAT one out?' is quite rude whether you realize it or not. I will continue talking with y

Posted on 02/19/2007 at 10:02:00 PM

 
Great article!

Posted on 02/19/2007 at 9:02:00 AM

 
And ANOTHER thing, if you would take the time to READ my statements correctly, you'd figure out that I wasn't giving the "RIGHT" way of spanking. Just my O P I N I O N. It's ok that we have different views, and I don't think less of you because you don't agree with mine. However, I think you're in IDIOT and need to take reading comprehension classes. You're reading what I'm saying, but you're not READING it. Can you figure THAT one out? I'm not insulting you, just speaking what I think is the truth. Do you know the difference of truth and opinion? Do you know the difference of insult and a simple question? Slow down and read more carefully and maybe you'll figure it out.

Posted on 02/18/2007 at 9:02:00 PM

 
Heather- You shouldn't be so sensitive. If you can't handle a simple question of as I said, genuine "curiousity", there is something wrong. I wasn't looking for another issue to argue about, just that I wanted to know about the pagan religion. If that's the way you act over a simple question, I don't see how ANYONE would want to talk to you. You seem to have a hard time figuring out the difference between a question and an insult.

Posted on 02/18/2007 at 8:02:00 PM

 
Just because you don't think something should be offensive doesn't mean it isn't. I explained why the wording was potentially offensive. Insulting someone on the basis of their being offended by the statement "I want to know why people are Pagans!" is extremely insensitive and juvenile. That you wouldn't be offended by it doesn't mean no one else in the world would, and that you don't understand why the question would be offensive to a member of a religion that is often persecuted, by a person who is forced by society to explain her religious views all the time, etc. doesn't mean that anyone who is offended by it has a screw loose. Your description of the "right" way to spank and the mental image of a grown ex-Marine striking a 7 year old make my stomach turn, too, making us quite even. I have no more to say to you.

Posted on 02/18/2007 at 7:02:00 PM

 
Heather- Wow. I really think you need to re-read how I worded the Pagan thing. I do believe I said that I didn't know anything about it, and wanted to know more. If you're offended by that, or the way it was written, WHICH IN NO WAY should it be or is it offensive, makes me think you have a screw loose. Not because of the spanking issue, that has nothing to do with it, but because of your reaction to a simple, honest question of curiousity. NO, I wouldn't be offended by someone asking about why I'm a Christan! Just because of you being offended over a simple question turns my stomach, and I'm not going to waste any more time talking with you.

Posted on 02/18/2007 at 5:02:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 67
Next >>
Advertisment