Virginia Lawmakers May Require HPV Vaccine for Girls

The First of the Three-part Vaccine Would Be Administered to Girls Entering the Sixth Grade

By Charlotte Kuchinsky, published Feb 01, 2007
Published Content: 1,289  Total Views: 798,183  Favorited By: 266 CPs
Rating: 4.6 of 5
It seems that Virginia lawmakers are once again legislating how parents handle their children. Most recently, state legislators proposed changes in school dietary programs aimed at reducing the number of overweight and obese children attending Virginia schools. Some parents quickly rose up in arms fearing that the next step would be to ostracize children who didn't conform or fit it into the weight standards established by the state. While that issue is still under heavy debate, lawmakers are now eyeing legislation that would require young girls to submit to a new drug that is supposed to prevent cervical cancer. While most parents do not, on the surface, have a problem with the preventative medication, they are fearful what consequences might occur for girls who opt not to submit to the vaccine. This is sure to once again stir further debate about the state's right to legislate matters of parental control.

The drug in question, which was approved by the FDA in mid 2006 is touted as preventing the human papillomavirus. More often referred to as HPV, this is, in fact, a series of about 100 different strains of sexually transmitted viruses. It obviously includes the virus that is known to cause cervical cancer. HPV is relatively common. The CDC notes that about 80 percent of all women will contract at least one strain by the age of 50. However, in most cases a woman's body is able to fight the infection, whereby it often disappears without the woman being aware that she had the disease. The proposed drug, called Gardasil, which was developed by Merck & Company, protects against four strains of HPV which cause approximately 70 percent of cervical cancers and 90 percent of cervical warts.

Virginia Lawmakers May Require HPV Vaccine for Girls

It is believed that these shots could save women's lives.

Credit: Click Art

Copyright: Broderbund

Takeaways
  • Some Virginia parents fear state lawmakers are making mandates that should remain in parental control.
  • Many Virginia physicians are in favor of this law, noting that it could save lives from being lost to cervical cancer.
  • The law does make special provisions for religious and medical concerns.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
Vaccine center issues warning, By Gregory Lopes, THE WASHINGTON TIMES,Published February 3, 2007 ............The National Vaccine Information Center yesterday warned state officials to investigate the safety of a breakthrough cancer vaccine as Texas became the first state to make the vaccine mandatory for school-age girls. Negative side effects of Gardasil, a new Merck vaccine to prevent the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer, are being reported in the District of Columbia and 20 states, including Virginia.

Posted on 02/04/2007 at 8:02:00 AM

 
I have a real problem with this. Due to observations as a former pharmacy technician I am leary of most new drugs. Each parent should have the right to come to their own conclusion about use of the drug in their child's life. I understand requiring chicken pox vaccines - it is a transmittable disease. But a vaccine for cancer? This is not protecting the public health. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. And I thought California was bad for legislating darn near everything!

Posted on 02/03/2007 at 12:02:00 PM

 
I think it's insane to think that a 12 year old girl will think it's okay to have sex because she got a shot. This isn't about sex (although a lot of people are making it out to be), it's about cancer. In 2002, 270,000 women died of cervical cancer. That's real and that's now. Up to 70% of those deaths were caused by the virus that Gardasil targets. Good parenting, a firm moral foundation and accurate information is more effective in preventing teen sex than withholding a vitally important vaccine. Great article, though. Most of the pieces I've read about this are biased one way or the other.

Posted on 02/02/2007 at 10:02:00 PM

 
We need to look at long term results of this vaccine before giving it to our girls. Thanks for an interesting read.

Posted on 02/02/2007 at 10:02:00 AM

 
Great article! This particular vaccination really bothers me to to have forced on young girls. If I were a parent I'd want to know more about the long term effects and what kind of studies to they have to back up their claims that it does what it is suppose to without doing other things as well.

Posted on 02/02/2007 at 7:02:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Most Commented On