Why Do People Chose Unassisted Childbirth?

A Discussion About the Many Reasons People Have for Refusing Medical Care Unless It's Necessary

Women chose a variety of different reasons to birth without a medical attendant. It can be a need for independance or a desire to have a private birth experience. Sometimes it's accidental or because a midwife is too expensive. Some women do it to be in control. Others want to be put in
 touch with their innervoice. Birthing unassisted can be religious and spiritual. Maybe a person simply feels birth is too ordinary--or to profound--to include medics. For whatever the reason, the movement is on the rise, and more women are discovering the freedom of birthing unhindered, with just their closest loved ones present.

There are women who birth unassisted purely by accident, which is the most dangerous form of childbirth. Women who chose to birth unassisted spend months planning and preparing so that they can handle anything that may come up. When an unassisted birth is accidental, usually the woman is not ready to take full responsibility and be in control of the situation. This can happen when labor is too quick. Either the mother didn't make it to the hospital or the midwife didn't arrive on time. In these cases, the risks are slightly higher. Birthing unassisted, however, is not as dangerous as it seems, as usually the outcome of even accidental births is good once medical attention is received.

Other women simply cannot afford a midwife and know that birthing at home is safer than at the hospital. In some states, midwives are not allowed to attend homebirths, and doctors often refuse as well. Some places don't even have any practicing midwives there, so there are some people who must birth unassisted because their only other option is hospital birth. Some women simply live too far away from a hospital or birthing center. Many women begin their journey to freebirthing because of this, but upon closer examination, discover that it was the right choice for them all along. Maybe it's destiny.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 22 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Women have the choice to legally kill their baby before it's born but not to decide where they are born if they chose to let them live. I am having trouble following that logic.

Posted on 10/17/2008 at 12:10:50 PM

Yep, it's me!!

Posted on 10/12/2008 at 10:10:45 AM

Heather, are you going to be on TV in a documentary called Free Birthing? I saw it advertised on the History channel and one of the Moms looked like you.

Posted on 10/10/2008 at 8:10:18 PM

It is, and the cost of midwives--while lower than hospital birth--is a lot to pay out of pocket. A lot of insurance companies don't cover it or will only cover CNMs, who don't typically attend homebirths making the coverage clause a bit pointless. It's either come up with $2000 to birth at home--or go it alone. And that is sad. Everyone should have the right to the birth support they want.

Posted on 02/22/2007 at 10:02:00 PM

UC is definately becoming more and more common as C-section rates sky rocket and "active management" of labor becomes more and more routine. I know several women who felt their only options were to either suffer indignities at the hands of their physicians or birth at home on their own. Sad when women feel so helpless in a supposedly "culturally advanced and tolerant" country.

Posted on 02/22/2007 at 10:02:00 AM

Angela, a lot of your comments cut off so I didn't get to read them all, but if I could, I'd give you a standing ovation for everything you just said. Heather - I think doctors mean well, but they just get caught up in everything, the politics, the power, the money--like politicians.

Posted on 02/09/2007 at 12:02:00 PM

Dear anon - I wonder about your comment regarding your sisters birth and the baby who's head got "stuck". Was your sister pushing in a squatting position? Or was she on her back in a hospital bed? Did you sister have an epidural? Did your sister have Pitocin? Squatting increases the size of the pelvis by up to 20% and I'd be willing to wager the doctor didn't suggest squatting before he suggested a surgery that increases his paycheck by $5000. The other three things, epidural, pitocin and reclined position on the bed all increase the difficulty of the labor, efficiency of the pushing stage and size of the pelvis. Therefore making it more likely to have difficulties and wind up "needing" a Cesarean.

Posted on 02/09/2007 at 9:02:00 AM

Incidentally, The Farm's midwives are run by the head midwife names Ina May Gaskin. If you are truly interested on the truth of the matter instead of just your personal anecdotal evidence check out one of her books and do some research on their statistics. :-) And honestly, why are your posting anonymously? I am not ashamed to link my words to my name becuase I have the numbers to back up what I am saying. Blessings, ANGELA

Posted on 02/09/2007 at 9:02:00 AM

Dear anon, your comment assumes that hospital births are the ideal situation for birthing but that is not so. The current ideal in terms of BEST outcomes are from a commune known as "The Farm" in Tennesee I believe where they have the best outcomes, haven't lost a single baby to shoulder distocia, have less than 5% transfer rate (moving the mothers to hospitals for delivery), less than 3% C-section rate and a FAR lower infant mortality rate than ANY hospital in the US. And on that subject, American hospitals rank 28th in infant mortality rates - the American model of birth IS NOT the safest or best model out there. 27 other countries loose fewer babies at birth than we do. Do not diefy hospitals, Anon, realize that mothers who choose options other than American Hospitals do so only after careful research, continious assesment during pregnancy, and much soul-searching and preparation. They are not irresponsible ninnies who go into it blindly. They are simply not willing to accept what i

Posted on 02/09/2007 at 9:02:00 AM

I very much enjoyed this article. I think what people who say "Oh I had trouble and would have died if I hadn't been in the hospital" don't understand is that often it is being in the hospital, and the interventions that come with it (IV's/Pitocin/Aritificial Rupture of Membranes/Electronic Fetal Monitoring/Supine position/etc) that actually CAUSE many of the complications that the baby or mother then needs "saving" from. Complications that would not have been complications if the mother had been in a more supportive and natural environment. I have personally chosen the what is in my opinion the best of both worlds. A fantastic midwife who has a great deal of experience (breech births, water births, multiples, etc) but a "hands-off" philosophy. She saved me from needed a C-section with my first birth by helping me reposition the baby so labor would progress and with my second birth she did nothing at all until delivery of the placenta and my MOM got to catch the baby!! Totally awes

Posted on 02/09/2007 at 9:02:00 AM

Comments 1 - 10 of 22 Next >>