Analysis of Structuralism and the Multiple Viewpoints in Miramar

By Katharine Swan, published Nov 15, 2005
Published Content: 20  Total Views: 72,332  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
Although an analysis of structure cannot provide a complete analysis of a literary work, it can be used as a method of approach in interpretation. Robert Detweiler, in his book Story, Sign, and Self: Phenomenology and Structuralism as Literary-Critical Methods, describes how structuralism attempts to analyze literature: "In every instance it is the structure, the relationship among phonemes, sentences, and other elements of discourse, and not the individual elements by themselves that produces meaning" (18). In other words, studying the structure of language and the work as a whole does not explain the meaning, but it can provide an understanding of how a piece of literature takes on meaning. Miramar, by Naguib Mahfouz, provides an example of the uses of structural analysis. Miramar consists of the same basic story, told from the point of view of four different characters. On the language level, the diction each narrator uses to tell their story sets them apart from the others, while highlighting the division of culture that each comes to represent. On the plot level, the repetition of the same basic events works to further develop the story each time it is told, while the unique point of view of each telling provides a well-rounded view through pluralistic storytelling. These central ideas come together to form the whole: a slice out of life in Egypt, the Pension Miramar, and the lives of its residents.�

Takeaways
  • The language each man uses also establishes what Chatman calls the �presence� of the narrator.
  • Each retelling of the story from another point of view reveals something more about the murder.
  • Miramar is not simply an Egyptian novel - it is a universal theme.
Did You Know?
Miramar was originally published in Arabic in 1967. It has since been translated into many languages, and is read worldwide.
Resources
  • Booth, Wayne C. "Pluralism and Its Rivals." The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 1998. 786-796. Chatman, Seymore. "The Structure of Narrative Transmission." Style & Structure in Literature: Essays in the New Stylistics. Ed. Roger Fowler. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975. Culler, Jonathan. "Defining Narrative Units." Style & Structure in Literature: Essays in the New Stylistics. Ed. Roger Fowler. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975. - -. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975. Derrida, Jacques. "Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences." The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 1998. 878-889. Detweiler, Robert. Story, Sign, and Self: Phenomenology and Structuralism as Literary- Critical Methods. Philadelphia: Fortress Press; Missoula, Montana: Scholars Press, 1978. Eco, Umberto. "The Myth of Superman." The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 1998. 866-877. James, Henry. "The Art of Fiction." The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 1998. 436-447. Lodge, David. Working with Structuralism: Essays and Review on Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Literature. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981. Mahfouz, Naguib. Miramar. Trans. Fatma Moussa-Mahmoud. 2nd ed. Three Continents Press, 1990. Richter, David H., ed. "Structuralism, Semiotics, and Deconstruction." The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 1998. 809-834.
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Most Commented On