Amartya Sen: Argumentative Communist Ideologue

Lover of Soviet Union

By Amrevis, published Nov 10, 2005
Published Content: 31  Total Views: 13,359  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Rating: 3.1 of 5
Anyone with a figment of understanding of Indian psyche would say that the basic problem plaguing Indians is their herd mentality. Indian culture has failed to inculcate its people with the moral or intellectual strength to devise new ways of making things happen; bereft of an innovative culture, Indians prefer to follow blindly the path charted out by tradition, and if tradition does not work they let sundry religious gurus or political masters dictate for them a course of action.

Thanks to the unthinking attitude of the average Indian, even today large swaths of the country continues to be vitiated by an anti-science brahmanical culture that propagates caste system, beliefs in astrology, invocation of sundry Gods and Goddesses in face of every calamity, whether man-made or natural. So where is the argumentative tradition that Amartya Sen incessantly harps about in his much hyped book! Such a tradition is nowhere to be seen across the cultural and historical landscape of India.

Beginning his book (The Argumentative Indian, Penguin), Amartya says, ‘Prolixity is not alien to us in India. We are able to talk at some length, Krishan Menon's Record of the longest speech ever delivered at the United Nations (nine hours non-stop), established half a century ago, has not been equaled by anyone from anywhere.' What about Krishnan Menon's content? Did Krishnan Menon apply his mind while making that speech or did he blindly parrot clichés and banalities from the dialectical mirage of communism! Surely, mere verbosity does not ensure reasoned argument.

We Indians might be good at talking nonsense at length, but when it comes to making arguments on basis of reason and logic, we fail abysmally. Nowhere is this fact more in evidence than in the way we incorporated the Marxist point of view in our constitution. To delude ourselves we baptized Marxism under a new Indian name- Nehruvian Socialism. What was Nehruvian Socialism other than Marxism and Leninism packaged in a khadi rag! But again there was no argumentation in the choice of our politics, which got imposed on us by small westernized elite.

Takeaways
  • Amratya Sen is a dedicated communist.
  • Communists can only thrive when there is lack of argumentation or debate in the nation.
  • Communists crave for zombie society where rulers will do the thinking
Did You Know?
Amartya Sen is the Second Bengali to win Nobel Prize
Comments
Showing Comment 1 of 1
 
 
While I have not read the book, I definitely agree that Indians argue a lot but its all AFNS "All Fart No Shit". I have hard time talking to people here that suddenly go offtrack in business meeting who (I dont know if it is intentional) use red-herring arguments or even digress from the original topic to obfuscate the real issue. It is annoying. But I dont think it is caste driven or pushed on the ordinary by "The Man", i think it is a general lack of listening, analysing and combined with a myopic view of the world. The same applies for Indians in the US (1st or second generation!)

Posted on 08/11/2006 at 11:08:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comment 1 of 1
 
Most Commented On