Find » Technology » Science » An Introduction to Catastrophism: W...

An Introduction to Catastrophism: When Science and the Bible Agree

By Sharon Cohen, published Feb 09, 2007
Published Content: 102  Total Views: 78,720  Favorited By: 147 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.5 of 5
Have you noticed the paradigm shift?

- From a solid belief in the Bible, the biblical flood and an earth of mere thousands of years in age,

- To skepticism in the Bible, rejection of the biblical flood of Noah and an earth billions upon billions of years old.

The amazing stories from the Bible, considered improbable within the accepted fact of modern scientists, find rational and logical explanations in Catastrophism.

The Science of Catastrophism satisfies the intellectual incongruity of the Flood, Joshua's Long Day, and the Exodus miracles.

Bible prophecies, recorded in Revelation, find remarkably clear and meaningful explanation when considered in the light of Catastrophist principles.

"The principle of catastrophism is an assertion that catastrophic natural processes have been primarily responsible for the deposition of the various layers in the geologic column and all the rock formations that we observe. Until the 18th century, no other plausible explanation was considered. The biblical worldwide flood as well as other local floods were believed to be responsible for laying down the sedimentary rock layers we observe." (allaboutcreation.org)

Unfortunately for Bible believers of the 21st century, almost universally accepted as scientific fact are the theories espoused by Uniformity or Gradualism. Most of us have been taught in school that Earth's appearance has undergone a slow, gradual and uniform change. Science teachers and television documentaries proclaim that these gradual processes have operated over vast expanses of time--"billions and billions of years"-- to create the world as it is today. It is upon the basis of Gradualism that the Theory of Evolution was postulated.

Catastrophists, on the other hand, see planetary catastrophes as the primary agent of change in the Earth. They believe that extra planetary bodies (asteroids, comets, etc.) have wrought sudden, dramatic change on the past, altering the Earth's appearance and destroying life in wholesale cataclysms. The time scale for such sweeping change is thus dramatically shortened in the Catastrophist view.

An Introduction to Catastrophism: When Science and the Bible Agree

In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth.

Credit: Linda Long

Copyright: Linda Long

Takeaways
  • If you want to better comprehend history and prophecy as contained in the Bible, you should investigate Catastrophism.
  • Catastrophism makes the Bible more meaningful than you ever thought possible.
  • Every Christian should understand Catastrophism as "science" supported by the Bible.
Did You Know?
Until the 18th century, the biblical worldwide flood as well as other local floods were believed to be responsible for laying down the sedimentary rock layers we observe.
Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 54
Next >>
 
Interesting article. Very thought-provoking. I had never heard about this topic before.

Posted on 04/10/2007 at 9:04:00 PM

 
Very interesting.

Posted on 04/10/2007 at 4:04:00 AM

 
I heard of this but not in-depth. Well-written and informative. Thanks.

Posted on 03/29/2007 at 5:03:00 PM

 
This was a really great article, thank you for sharing it.

Posted on 03/26/2007 at 1:03:00 PM

 
Interesting info and well written.

Posted on 03/21/2007 at 10:03:00 PM

 
Hi, I followed your "clickable link" you supplied in your reply to me in the general AC discussions about our image being gone and I am glad I jumped over here to read your content. Very well written. One of my favorite things to read about is Science and Religion. I feel Science supports the bible more than not.

Posted on 03/10/2007 at 2:03:00 PM

 
Cheril - I couldn't agree more! And you put it perfectly. I especially like your description of the "still small voice"! Thank you!

Posted on 02/27/2007 at 11:02:00 AM

 
Sharon, Thanks for your insight. Just a couple of things. The world consists of two histories One is physical, and the other is spiritual. That they do not necessarily correspond with one another is that they both teach different aspects of the same idea. One is of a physical concern, and the other is of a spiritual concern. A spiritual account does not seek physical support to prove spiritual history. On the other hand, physical history is constantly concerned with whether or not spiritual history resonates with it. Spiritual history cannot be found in the ground, it is found in the heart. Trying to prove spiritual matters by digging in the ground will never determine spiritual truth. If spiritual truth is found in the heart, then looking for a physical interpretation as to why must come out of the heart, not the ground. Many times I have heard the physical interpretation of why, which can also be religious, but the spiritual interpretation....that is whispered to the one who seeks

Posted on 02/27/2007 at 11:02:00 AM

 
Wow. Interesting. I never heard of this. I have to look it up. Thanks for the article. Great job.

Posted on 02/25/2007 at 12:02:00 AM

 
My life is so chaotic of late that contemplating science vs. Biblical history is something I had not begun to even think about. Your article on the subject is quite interesting and well written. Thanks for taking the time to research and write about it.

Posted on 02/24/2007 at 7:02:00 PM

 
Wow a new science that I'd never heard of. Amazing how things have changed so much in the general belief systems of people. Excellent article.

Posted on 02/14/2007 at 12:02:00 PM

 
interesting, good read. I've always been intrigued with the battle between religion and science but have never seen it viewed in this light.

Posted on 02/12/2007 at 7:02:00 PM

 
PS, nice article Sharon ;)

Posted on 02/12/2007 at 8:02:00 AM

 
CONTINUED -- of coal? And ironically, a boat has been discovered in the exact spot the Bible says the Ark landed. Secular scholars report very rapid sedimentation and periods of great carbonate deposition in earth's sedimentary layers, which validate the Biblical flood. There are countless others that disprove evolution. You can't deny that evolution is full of holes. People who still believe in evolution do it only because they want to.

Posted on 02/12/2007 at 8:02:00 AM

 
Jeff, its a myth that people believed the earth was flat. Study the ancient Athenians, etc, the theories of Plato, his relations of Socrates, etc. They understood the earth was round. Washington Irving published a humourous short story in the 1800's that made fun of Spain by saying they believed the earth to be flat. This was in literature books in public schools, but in the 1900's some idiot decided it belonged in the science books, and then it was taught in public schools as facts...they knew it was round, all they had to do was watch a ship sail out, and see how it appeared to "sink down" into the water. Evolution can't show one transitional animal. There have been discovers of 'modern' objects being found inside of chunks of coal, such as spoons and a spark plug. These things were found in the center of large amounts of coal that were dug up. If it takes coal as long to form as they say, how did things like tin cups and spark plugs end up encased in the center of large chunks of

Posted on 02/12/2007 at 8:02:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 54
Next >>
Advertisment