Indiana Senate Bill 327 Makes HPV Vaccine Optional for Young Girls

Adjust font-size: + 
More:HPVSenate BillNational Organization for Women

Despite Arguments that the Vaccination Would Sabatoge "abstinence" Message

Indiana Senate Bill 327, which would make it optional for girls entering the sixth grade to be vaccinated against the human papilloma virus (HPV), a sexually transmitted virus shown to cause genital warts and cervical
 cancer, has finally been approved. However, a previous version of the bill, which would have made the vaccinations mandatory, was met with strong opposition from conservatives, pro-lifers and parental rights groups who argue that the vaccination will somehow encourage early sexual activity.

Some even argue that the vaccine would "sabotage our abstinence message". This is an allegation that Kim Gandy, President of the National Organization for Women calls "vacuous and inexcusable". She lost her grandmother to cervical cancer and says she has "two daughters who might be spared that fate with this vaccine".

According the Indianapolis Star, "Under the revised bill, parents of girls would get a warning from the state Department of Health about the link between HPV and cancer. Within 20 days, parents would have to notify the school whether they will or won't vaccinate their children."

Monica Boyer director of Indiana Voice for the Family tells the Star "Were Happy...We want to make sure that it (the bill) stays in that form". She goes on to tell them that she believes opponents are being "unfairly cast as abstinence supporters."

"It doesn't have anything to do with sex," she said. "It's about a lack of study and parental rights."

According to the National Cancer Institute, this year 9,710 cases of invasive cervical cancer will be diagnosed and 3,700 women will die of the disease. The primary cause of cervical cancer is the human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV is the most common sexually transmitted virus in the US today. The CDC estimates that at least 50 percent of people will contract this virus at some time in their life. While there are various strains of the virus, research has concluded that types 16 and 18 are responsible for a large percentage of cervical cancer cases.

 
Type in Your Comments Below

Why did Governor Rick Perry reverse his pre-election position and issue an outrageous executive order mandating that all girls in the sixth grade receive the HPV vaccine? He says that it is about saving the lives of women. If this were his true motives, then why did he issue his press release late on the Friday afternoon preceding the Super Bowl? Why didn't he hold a huge news conference with fanfare, boasting of his efforts? Perry's action took place without a single word of public debate. It appears to be a corporate welfare program for Merck, the creator of the vaccine, and will be paid for at the expense of Texas school girls who will be the guinea pigs for this unproven treatment. That's right, unproven treatment. This is not a vaccine against cervical cancer; rather it is a vaccine against HPV which is contracted through sexual relations. Merck admits in its own literature that it did not prove that the vaccine would prevent cancer. The HPV vaccine only protects against 4
Sharon, you had good questions and issues. First, I do agree, not every 13 year old is having sex, but this vaccine is not about IF they are having sex now, it is about WHEN they do. The vaccine is only effective if they have had no sexual exposure whatsoever, so it's best in preteen girls. The reason why the vaccine focuses girls and not boys is because HPV generally only causes cervical cancer in women, not men.
Melissa W: I agree with being worried about Perry's financial motivations behind his order.
I should have prefaced my statement by saying I don't trust the FDA or government very much and detest the thought of giving them control over my body by making medical decisions for me.
I noticed one of your quotes. Why does everyone keep taking about "parental rights." What about the right of the preteen? I understand many teens don't have the intellect to challenge a doctor, but hopefully the ones who recognize that they should delay this vaccine until they need it, would have enough sense to object. Not every 13-year-old is having sex. Ultimately, this issue is about vaccine safety for me and weighing the dangers of the vaccine against other risk factors. Why aren't we vaccinating boys? Is it perhaps because the safety of the vaccine is not proven so we don't want to overburden the health of someone who doesn't have a cervix? Vaccines attempt to eradicate viruses, yet we're only eliminating females from getting select strains of HPV with this vaccine. If the vaccine works as claimed, wouldn't it be more beneficial to attempt to eliminate the virus by vaxing boys and girls?
Good article. I live in Texas and our Governor just issued an executive order making the vaccine mandatory for all girls entering 6th grade (http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/140060/hpv_vaccination_ordered_for_all_girls.html) I do see the benefits, but I also have a problem with the fact that he seemed to have been swayed more by the money that Merck (who stands to gain a lot from this) is funneling into this.
Comments 1 - 6 (of 6) 
Share
Tweet
Share on Facebook
Post a comment
6
2
Helpful?
Most Commented