Rita Whack is Wack!

...and She Hates 50 Cent Too!

By Shamontiel, published Nov 14, 2005
Published Content: 161  Total Views: 279,054  Favorited By: 72 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.0 of 5
A Closed Mind: The Journalist's Worst Enemy

I had counted down the days until the Media Roundtable with Laura S. Washington, an Ida B. Wells-Barnett University professor, would host the "Reporters on the Record" discussion on Monday, November 7th. As a freelance writer/editor, I was interested in finding out more about black writers like Chris Benson, Yolanda Joe, David Thigpen, and Rita Whack. I went into Schmitt Academic Center thinking I was going to learn about the ups and downs of being a black writer in an unbalanced media, how to bring out black news in journalism, and how to go about making a successful full-time career in writing. Unfortunately, I left there with only negative views of Rita Whack.

David Thigpen, a journalist who covers music commentary, made a comment about musicians like 50 Cent coming out with books, in addition to his book on Jam Master Jay "Jam Master Jay: The Heart of Hip-Hop." Whack piggy-backed onto that comment by stating that she does not like 50 Cent because she doesn't like "the way he depicts women." Now as a big Sister Souljah and Eric Jerome Dickey fan, she'd already annoyed me by saying she didn't like Eric Jerome Dickey but not backing up why. I didn't understand how she compared "The Coldest Winter Ever" to 50 Cent's book. She blew my mind when she talked about how she wanted Toni Morrison to "shut her mouth" about telling how poor, black people really lived. But when she said the comment about "the way [50 Cent] depicts women," I was hot. Not only did she mention it once, she mentioned it twice. When the audience was allowed to speak and one woman pointed out that even if Whack doesn't like the way 50 Cent is making his money, he is succeeding in a society set against him, Whack went on to say that she wouldn't support a crack dealer.

Rita Whack is Wack!

50 Cent

Credit: Yahoo

Copyright: Yahoo

Takeaways
  • Rita Whack
  • 50 Cent
  • DePaul University
Did You Know?
Rita Whack was nominated for an Emmy.
Comments
Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
The difference between the two groups is that chop shop works are doing work that is cheating them out of pay for a respectable job. A video ho is not doing anything respectable at all and can back out at any point and time. Most of them are doing it just to have sex with the next big artist, making little money to do it, and craving attention. Kanye had some motivation to make "Golddigger." People have a choice--even the most uneducated, poor, and insecure still have a choice--if they choose to use their bodies for pay and blame the artist who did not knock them down and drag them out the house to dance, then they need to stop blaming folks for THEIR mistakes. They need to grow up; shouldn't have dropped out; and can't blame rap music on their problems.

Posted on 08/25/2006 at 10:08:00 PM

 
#1 The difference between your Nike analogy and this article is that the people who are working in chop shops are doing this WITHOUT any sources to fight the issues. Video hos know they're video hos and don't care...they get a kick out of that nonsense and go to extremes to be in the video. Many people are in chop shops are for survival and illegal immigrants, but these women are getting $50 to demean themselves while chop shops are running a very disturbing business (but no one in there is doing anything that would compromise their sexuality and downgrade their character). #2 Your definition of exploitation is correct, but you forget that these women are LETTING themselves be taken advantage of. You don't hear video hos crying about being in such-n-such's video--they're telling all their girls. Superhead wore pasties just to make sure she was the lead girl. Have you ever watched that video ho documentary on MTV? Women went to absolute extremes just to MEET the artist...bu

Posted on 07/15/2006 at 9:07:00 PM

 
Let me follow your logic: If someone does something willingly, and for pay, the person who hired them to do the job should be absolved of acusations of exploitation. Really. Then is it safe to say that you take no issue, for example, in Nike and other sports giants hiring workers for pennies/hr to make your tennis shoes. Applying your logic, the workers go to the factory willingly, they are PAID, so who are we to say Nike exploited them? Doesn't sound very logical does it? The definition of explotation is simple: the act of employing another for selfish gain and for the greatest possible advantage. 50 cent and so many other hip hop artists fit the bill. Video hoes in most cases don't even get paid minimum wage. I know. I've been approached to be in videos...more than once...the pay offered was ridiculously low. It was easy for me to say "NO," but who knows, if I weren't educated, wealthy and secure enough I may have been one the thousands of women who are "willinging" e

Posted on 04/07/2006 at 6:04:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Advertisment