Find » Arts & Entertainment » E*trade's Bank Robbery Ad Too Subtl...

E*trade's Bank Robbery Ad Too Subtle

2007 Super Bowl Ad Review

By Question Everything, published Feb 05, 2007
Published Content: 114  Total Views: 121,614  Favorited By: 49 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.3 of 5
E*trade joined the ranks of advertisers who choose to identify themselves only in the last few seconds with their 'Bank Robbery' ad. They did keep their advertising a little more on-topic than some, but their ad still may not be as effective as it could.

E*trade's ad begins in a crowed bank. A man stands up and announces that he is the bank manager and that this is a robbery. All the employees straight through to the security guard pull down animal masks to cover their faces.

The customers look highly confused, of course. The bank manager continues to insist that this is a robbery and that the customers should get down on the floor and hand over their cash. They do, eventually, get over their confusion enough to comply.

E*trade wants consumers to know that there is an alternative to investing with their banks. Their message is that banks may be robbing their customers. The implication, of course, is that consumers can make more, and keep more, by investing with E*trade.

The commercial was definitely different, so it earns points for originality. It was, unfortunately, a bit complex and may leave viewers as confused as the bank customers. It was also kind of funny, once I got the point of it. I admit that I don't always "get" jokes right from the start, but I had to ponder this commercial for a few minutes to see where it was going.

Is that the best tactic for a commercial, particularly one set to air during the Super Bowl? No, it probably isn't.

E*trade's commercial puts too much of the burden on the viewers. Commercials are already a nuisance, an interruption. Viewers are not likely to want to make the effort to think about this commercial and what it may be trying to imply.

During the Super Bowl, there is so much going on that demand for attention is very high. That makes it an especially poor time to try to get viewers to concentrate on a commercial with deeper meaning.

The only upside here, in terms of advertising, is that those people who did try to figure it out were likely still watching when E*trade finally took credit for the ad.



E*trade's Bank Robbery Ad Too Subtle

If your bank is robbing you, turn to E*trade?

Credit: E*trade

Copyright: E*trade

Resources
  • (
Comments
Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
I, for one, loved this ad. I wish there were more just like it.

Posted on 02/28/2008 at 7:02:49 PM

 
The question recalls the fictional situation, which has just been presented. Now that the event and corresponding question are tied together in the slightly longer term memory, an intelligent person might reflect on it and remember it later. I say an intelligent person because this is an investment firm and their target audience is not necessarily the average or below-average person, though again, I don't honestly think that the average person is really that incapable of figuring it out. The only negative thing I can really say about it was the yelling. It's a two-edged sword, more than anything, because it's an attention grabber and a negative mood setter at the same time. But it's not really that bad, though, because the experession on his face doesn't really indicate anger but immediacy. Almost no advertising these days makes people think, which is why it's totally ineffective and possibly counterproductive in light of many people, including me, annoyed with the idiocy. I, for

Posted on 02/28/2008 at 7:02:27 PM

 
I don't really agree with this analysis at all. I will say that I understood it while watching it, but I could see how it could be misunderstood. If this is complex, then that's a sad statement on the attention span of the average American. I sincerely don't believe people are really /that/ unattentative, especially with Super Bowl commercials. Some people watch them and ignore the game. I will be going out on a limb by saying this, I'm sure, but complex commercials are actually better. If people have to analyze or intuit somewhat, then they are more likely to remember it. I could go in to all the details, but to be short, an intelligent person watching the commercial will remember the situation (a bank robbery) when the question is put forward ("Is your bank robbing you?"). This breaks the short-term memory barrier because two distinct, memorable elements separated by sufficient time are now related to each other. The question recalls the fictional situation, which has just been p

Posted on 02/28/2008 at 7:02:24 PM

 
To watch, it was cool. I was really surprised by it. I just believe that the most effective ads, particularly during the Super Bowl with so much going on, are simple and clear. I'm with you, forget the complexity - it's advertising!

Posted on 02/05/2007 at 4:02:00 PM

 
I'm starting to see a complexity trend, which explains why I don't like TV and advertisements very much. This ad had me cracking up immediately.

Posted on 02/05/2007 at 2:02:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Advertisment