"Saw III" is Just Another Sick Film

Slasher Films Should Not Be in the Same Category as Horror

By Charlotte Kuchinsky, published Feb 13, 2007
Published Content: 1,289  Total Views: 798,183  Favorited By: 266 CPs
Rating: 3.9 of 5
I have been avoiding the popular Saw movie series like the plague. While I am a horror movie fanatic, I view "horror" and "slasher" movies as separate genres. I realize that, in critic's minds, they are one and the same. However, I define horror movies as films that can give the audience a good scare without resulting to 90 minutes of blood and guts. Obviously, on the other hand, slasher movies are all about blood and guts.

I decided that in order to be completely objective concerning this series, I needed to watch at least one of the three films. I chose the latest one "Saw III" for several reasons. First, I wanted to see if the moviegoer would understand what was going on without having seen the first two films. Second, I wanted to see how gory it might actually be, since each film in a series tends to get progressively worse. Lastly, I kept hearing it touted as the "best Saw ever!"

I stand by my original statement. The Saw series is an insult to true horror aficionados. It is a slasher film, plain and simple. It is a slasher film with an actual story, which is truly rare within that genre. Nonetheless, it is nothing but a slasher film.

In "Saw III" the notorious Jigsaw has, once again, set up a series of games for his victims to play in order to choose life or death. The movie begins in the middle of one such game. A man is shackled by the foot to a wall in a cold, dark, damp room. Just out of his reach are a gun and a flashlight. By romoving his boot and using it as an extension of his arm, he manages to get hold of both items. Of course, the gun is empty. He uses the flashlight to check out his surroundings. After doing so, he has a pretty good idea of what is going on and realizes that he can only get free with his own initiative and courage.

This sets up a series of three such games. The second one involves a career criminal and his penchant for continuing to break the law. He is chained at the shoulders, wrists, abdomen, legs, and face. The masked Jigsaw, on the video he views while in captivity, accuses him of being more comfortable in chains than with freedom. The game challenges him to choose freedom over the chains.

"Saw III" is Just Another Sick Film

"Saw III" is the third in the popular Saw series.

Credit: Click Art

Copyright: Broderbund

Takeaways
  • Horror films and slasher films are not the same thing.
  • Slasher films are all about guts and gore.
  • "Saw III" has a good plot that, in the hands of a gifted writer and a talented director, could have been great.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 12 of 12
 
 
the 2nd and third where really gory compared to the first which personally i thought with the best.

Posted on 08/17/2007 at 3:08:00 PM

 
Just a thought, with such a large percentage of citizens that crave slasher films and the need to see sick views on the value of life, why do people flip out over stupid stuff like 911, the VA Tech Shootings, and god forbid :p the Columbine Shootings. I mean hey they are all the same mentality just demonstrated in different ways, reality vs. drama. Ever think that law and culture has kept us from actually demonstrating what we really want to see hapen in reality. Technically speaking, humans love to see the insides both physically and mentally of people that we cannot see on the outside. Do slasher films prove this? Or are they just for fun? In a nut shell it's a sick sad world. Take this comment as you please.

Posted on 06/06/2007 at 9:06:00 PM

 
WEll to those of you who can watch these types of movies, my hats off to you. Just like a child, they actually give me nightmares.

Posted on 02/28/2007 at 9:02:00 AM

 
I loved the saw Trilogy. Thought the movies were excellent!

Posted on 02/15/2007 at 6:02:00 AM

 
I loved the Saw movies. We just seen part three when it came out on dvd.I thought it was great,better then the second.To understand them you need to start from one. Of course if you don't like blood and gore this isn't a movie you would enjoy. Good article!

Posted on 02/15/2007 at 6:02:00 AM

 
Wow, I must be the only one here who actually enjoyed Saw I, II, and III. I think they're some of the most original horror films ever created. If you actually listen to what Jigsaw has to say - and pay attention to minute details, then you would better understand the series.

Posted on 02/15/2007 at 2:02:00 AM

 
Charlotte, you should know better than to start off with the third movie (if there was a way to emphasize me saying that in a "kidding around" manner, I'd do it) . . . especially in a series where a new installment comes out every single year. I wasn't a huge fan of the first Saw, myself, but I'm guessing it was much better than the third (mainly because the plot was original).

Posted on 02/15/2007 at 2:02:00 AM

 
It was disgusting. Great review!

Posted on 02/15/2007 at 1:02:00 AM

 
Even the packaging for the movie scares me!

Posted on 02/14/2007 at 11:02:00 AM

 
Revolting movie. I don't know how you sat through it long enough to do a review, but the review tells me all I need to know- stay away.

Posted on 02/14/2007 at 8:02:00 AM

 
Vidi, vini, vici - I saw, I had some wine, I left. Good review.

Posted on 02/14/2007 at 7:02:00 AM

 
I think the Saw trilogy is just awful.

Posted on 02/14/2007 at 12:02:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 12 of 12
 
Most Commented On