The Rise of Starbucks

...And The Fall of the Small, Personable Coffeehouse

By Phil Dotree, published Feb 14, 2007
Published Content: 398  Total Views: 636,453  Favorited By: 27 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
Read a response to this article.

I like my coffee black, strong, and with enough caffeine to kill a hummingbird.

That's not to say that I know a whole lot about what I'm drinking, or that I'm a REAL MAN because I take my coffee as hard as I live my life. No, I'm a pretty normal dude; I appreciate a good cup of coffee when it's available, but I don't know the secrets of how it's made or why one blend tastes better than another.

However, I do know what bad coffee is, and as such I'm not sure that I understand the allure of Starbucks or why it's crushing its competition.

The Starbucks in my town is the worst coffee shop, by far; they hire kids in college to work as baristas and fire them or they quit every new season, so nobody serving you a cup of coffee has worked at the job for more than a month or two. The coffee is burnt, bitter, and there's no noticeable difference between the mild and strong brew. A bit of Norah Jones on the stereo is nice, but it's not enough to make up for the fact that the coffee tastes like someone's been boiling a vat of ass in the back.

I realize that this is anecdotal evidence, but to tell the truth, I've never been to a Starbucks that was completely enjoyable. And yeah, they've got a lot of different types of drinks-mochas, frappaccinos, cappuccinos, espressos, hot cider, hot chocolate, iced coffee-but if you're just looking for a cup of coffee, you need an artisan brewing the cup who knows not to burn the beans or let the pot sit too long.

The mom-and-pop coffee shops I've been to--and there are three in my town-make a genuinely good cup of coffee. They serve it in a mug and I can grab a newspaper and sit outside without waiting in a line. Their employees are trained by the management, and they're the same kids that hang around the shop all the time; they know how things are supposed to work, and they're laid back and do their job well.

Again, I know, anecdotal evidence. But I haven't been to a lot of bad small coffeehouses, and maybe that's because coffeehouses are supposed to be kept small; like bars, they require a certain personality and a welcoming feeling, something that a chain of cold green logos and monolithic symbols can provide.

The Rise of Starbucks

Starbucks doesn't get the basics right.

Credit: Odyssee

Copyright: www.sxc.hu

Takeaways
  • Starbucks coffeehouses have no personality; they're uniform and cold.
  • Their employees seem to have no knowledge of how to make a good cup of coffee.
  • Coffeehouses need to be small, warm, and personable--chains of coffeehouses will always be disappointing.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
When I grew up, every street corner had an mama/poppa coffee shop, then they disappeared for many decades when more and more people switched over to drinking pop. If not for Starbucks making coffee an "in" and fashionable drink again, we never would have seen a return of the small independent coffee shops. So from my view point, Starbuck has not "mowed" anyone down. Without Starbucks, the small places would not have made a comeback in the first place.

Posted on 02/15/2007 at 2:02:00 PM

 
Starbucks success is all due to their "employee first" philosophy. They know that by taking care of their employees, with perks like 401k, medical leave, health insurance, etc., they are making their employees happy, and in turn, making their employees make the customer happy. By doing this, the demand for Starbucks continues to rise and they can pop up stores anywhere in the world to meet the demand.

Posted on 02/14/2007 at 2:02:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Most Commented On