Snickers Superbowl Ad Pulled Off the Air

After much controversy, the Snickers Kiss Superbowl ad has been pulled. The commercial will no longer appear on TV. In addition, the commercial and its alternate endings have also been removed from the snickers website.

The NFL and Snickers has come under criticism from various organizations including GLAAD (Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation). The controversy not only surrounds the actual commercial that aired during Sunday night's Superbowl, but also the
Snickers Superbowl Ad Pulled Off the Air
 contest on the Snickers website. Visitors to the website were invited to view alternate endings to the commercial and vote on which one was their favorite.

The ending that aired during the Superbowl showed two mechanics working on a car. One of the mechanics pulls out a snickers and puts it in his mouth. The other mechanic then starts eating from the other end of the candy bar. The two men's lips inadvertently meet in a "kiss". One of the men exclaims "Quick, do something manly". At this point both men pull hair from their chests.

While many found the commercial as it appeared offensive, perhaps the more offensive ending was one of the alternate endings that appeared on the Snickers website. In this version, instead of the men pulling hair from their chests, they pick up wrenches and start to beat one another with them. According to www.canada.com, Judy Shepard spoke out against this ending. You will remember that Judy Shepard's son, Matthew Shepard, was beaten to death in 1998. She is quoted as saying "(It) encourages the same type of hate that led to the death of my son Matthew," she said in a statement. "It essentially gives 'permission' to our society to verbally or physically harass individuals who are gay, lesbian or bisexual. In particular, I am dismayed that these players, who are role models to our young people, would participate in perpetuating such discrimination and prejudice."

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 55 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

NO drama here. I also see why they yanked it but all in all they got my attention. lol. I fell asleep during the superbowl party at my house so I missed out on all the commercials and am kicking myself about it. I thank people like you who write articles about it so that I can kind of get a feel of what the commercials where about.

Posted on 02/11/2007 at 5:02:00 AM

Okay, I apologize, never mind. Daniel, maybe you weren't paying attention to the fact that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq--although our troops were sent there on that premise. I was trying to make a point about powerful political groups like GLAAD not seeing the forest for the trees. But never mind--sorry I interrupted your conversation about candy bar commercials.

Posted on 02/09/2007 at 3:02:00 PM

After reading SarahJ's comment, I'm kind of starting to understand why it is offensive. It does seem that it sort of suggests that straight men are manlier. That they had to prove their manliness in some stupid way does kind of insinuate that they associate manliness with straightness, and there are loads of gay men who are QUITE masculine. I won't say it goes so far as to be homophobic, just two men who happen to be straight not wnating the other to think he's gay...but I will say that their actions in proving their straightness by demonstrating "manliness" do kind of perpetuate a stereotype and show a bit of ignorance.

Posted on 02/09/2007 at 12:02:00 PM

Seeing the commercial for the first time during the superbowl, I thought it was pretty juvenile, and poorly thought through for its effect. I also laughed! However people wish to view or deconstruct it, that's how a lot of guys are. A little slice of reality TV, if you will. But these days, reality is not acceptable, and, frankly, if I want to see that sort of thing I'll just watch 2 1/2 men, or Will and Grace, or Friends, and so on. I think that "can't you take a joke?" is usually a recovery from a major faux pas, but in this case, it might just be an appropriate response to the gay groups. Of course, they do get time in the media by raising the issue, so it's a worthwhile point for them. I totally agree, the barbaric alternate ending might very well be what raised more ire than anything.

Posted on 02/09/2007 at 8:02:00 AM

I read the article. Nice write. I still LOVE Snickers. I still think men kissing is ridiculously unnecessary and quite a way off from anything atractive and -it may have been sort of funny, but, then I have always thought all that was sort of silly anyway. I can't understand how Iraq has a thing to do with any of this, but I don't feel duped and anybody who does is...well, shall I say not paying attention? ...and, as for being offended...I don't care. If someone wants to feel offended, why should that bother me? I feel offended when I call a US number and some dope asks me what language I want...does anybody care? Kissing boys, eating Snickers and killing terrorists and freeing people from dictators! COOL BEANS and KUDOS!!!!

Posted on 02/09/2007 at 8:02:00 AM

P.S.--that's not *my* picture on the avatar..so what do I look like? Other than someone who's trying to raise awareness about more important issues than offensive commercials?

Posted on 02/08/2007 at 11:02:00 PM

And Shamontiel--would you please clarify your statement: "..just an FYI, to all of you folks who are saying you're tired of people being offended, I can pretty much guess what you look like and chances are, you have never been subjected to the same type of discrimination.." Just what do I look like? I sure hope you're not stereotyping me.

Posted on 02/08/2007 at 11:02:00 PM

I stand behind my previous whiner comments. It worries me that our country is on the brink of yet another war (this time in Iran) that the I.P.C.C. just issued a statement that we're in deep shit if we continue our present living habits,(and we're not going to suffer the worst for it--your grandkids will) and that the Supreme court has pretty much proven that we were totally lied to and tricked into the war in Iraq. This is all CURRENT news. When I think of the time and energy spent by a powerful political group getting a freaking CANDY BAR commercial pulled off the air, I get a little bent out of shape. Stop being so damned self-absorbed and take a look at what's happening to your country--our home!

Posted on 02/08/2007 at 11:02:00 PM

I think it is definitely homophobic, considering that the men trying to prove their manliness at the end in order to prove that they didn't mean to kiss each other is clearly reinforcing notions of only one type of masculinity being valid, and that type does not include wanting to kiss other men. AKA, homophobia. My full comments are posted here if anyone's interested: http://www.vibewire.net/sarahj/society/2007/feb/08/11/2007_s_wardrobe_malfunction

Posted on 02/08/2007 at 9:02:00 PM

Offensive or not, that was a REALLY stupid commercial. I can't believe they paid that much money to air it.

Posted on 02/08/2007 at 5:02:00 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 55 Next >>