How Science Led Me Away From, Then Back To, God

A Commentary on the Interplay of Science and Faith

By Hally Z., published Feb 16, 2007
Published Content: 117  Total Views: 79,213  Favorited By: 13 CPs
Rating: 4.5 of 5
Having just written an article on creationism/intelligent design and its incompatibility with evolutionary theory, I think that the scientific camp is going to feel let down after reading my current article. And yet, I find no contradiction with my scientific outlook on life and my increasing spirituality as I move headway into the third decade of my life. In fact, I am finding out that my increasing spiritual background lets me better understand, almost intuitively, various aspects of biology, chemistry, and physics. Furthermore, though I do conduct experiments to test out my "hunches", in many cases, those hunches actually prove true, thanks only to my prior meditation (premeditation?) on the Infinite.

I am not advocating any particular God, god/dess, or religion in this article. And while many of my colleagues may forever shun me after reading this clip, I would like to at least give a bit of personal background first, and then provide some arguments on why belief in something beyond ourselves in not only possible, but highly probable.

First, my background. Having sprung out (and I do mean that in every sense of the word) of a very religious, Catholic family, I went off to obtain my bachelor's in microbiology, and then my doctorate in genetics. There were two driving forces here: first, to use my education as a handy excuse to distance myself, as much as possible, from the sanctified views of all my family members. And secondly, having learned about such things as the Miller-Urey experiment (in a nut shell, the discovery that basic chemicals could form the building blocks of life), to finally prove that science could, in fact, answer all our questions about this universe.

Not much took me away from these two driving forces during the earning of my bachelor's degree. But once I embarked upon the doctorate, something started to change. Perhaps it was because, by the time I was halfway through my PhD, I had pretty much learned all that there was to learn in science. Anything further was uncharted territory, and it would be up to me to discover these hidden truths.

Did You Know?
Isaac Newton spent more time studying the Bible than mathematics. Gregor Mendel, the discoverer of hereditary characteristics, or genes, was a priest. Widely acclaimed scientist Basile J. Luyet, the "father of cryobiology" was a priest.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
Though only 'self educated' on the basics of quantum theory, I too have found that the more I study this science, the more I begin to revisit the beliefs of my youth. I find that I am believing more and more that we are more than a great cosmic "ooops".

Posted on 06/26/2008 at 1:06:54 PM

 
Wow, Halina, what a journey of discovery you've been on. Considering that the scientific method was begun--according to Daniel Boorstein's The Discoverers, at any rate--as a confirmation of knowledge gained through testing common sense and intuited discoveries, it would seem only right that the scientific method be tweeked (or re-tweeked) to allow for other than the five senses. Early discoverers quite certainly depended on more than five senses.

Posted on 09/23/2007 at 7:09:00 AM

 
Great story!

Posted on 02/24/2007 at 4:02:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On