Review of the Crusades Through Arab Eyes by Amin Maalouf

By Benjamin Cocchiaro, published Feb 15, 2007
Published Content: 18  Total Views: 1,573  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
In the study of history, it is often tempting to reify cultures and movements for the sake of cohesive narrative or linear structure. Many historians have fallen into this trap, evinced even by the ordinal numbering of the Crusades, but particularly in the condensation of their participants into the Arabs and the Westerners. Drawing primarily on the works of Islamic chroniclers, Maalouf is led not into temptation, but delivers instead a more complex account of the Crusades, emphasizing regional politics and power struggles rather than clashes between monolithic ideologies.

Indeed, while the Seljuk Turks nominally controlled the entire Muslim East, the empire was little more than a loose confederation. What's more, the Muslim world into which the Crusaders entered was hardly the tyrannical and impoverished 'Mohammedan' world that the Catholic bishops had railed against. On the contrary, Middle Eastern culture and living conditions were superior to those of their western counterparts. While Europe was still recovering from its Dark Ages, Maalouf recounts the work of Muslim scholars debating Aristotelian mathematics, sciences, and philosophy.

Seemingly superior in culture and, for a time, warfare, the Muslims perceived the Franj as solidly barbaric, thoroughly unclean, and deadly treacherous. As armor-clad knights began filtering into the Middle East, though, mounted Turkish archers became obsolete, and the Franj were eventually feared for their brutality and mercilessness. It chills the blood to read Maalouf's primary source transcriptions of the sack of the Holy City or of the cannibals at Ma'arra. However, to claim that the Franj were all so barbaric is to give into temptation. While brutality had certainly become the Frankish rule, Maalouf finds an exception in the emperor Frederick II. Far from religious zealotry, it is insinuated that Fredrick II was an atheist. His peaceful takeover of Jerusalem stands out in the history of the Crusades as not just the last, but also the least bloody.

Takeaways
  • History
  • Crusades
  • Politics
Did You Know?
The politics of the crusades were hardly clear-cut. Islamo-Frankish armies fought Islamo-Frankish armies.
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Most Commented On