Human Foreskins are Big Business for Cosmetics

In the business of vanity almost anything goes. Creams, lotions, and cosmetics are reported to be made out many things that most people would be repulsed by. Fish scales in lipsticks, cow placenta in anti-aging products, crushed female cochineal insects in shampoo, and human foreskin in
 face cream.

Foreskin fibroblasts are used to grow and cultivate new cells that are then used for a variety of purposes. From the fibroblasts new skin for burn victims can be grown, skin to cover diabetic ulcers, and controversially it is also used to make cosmetic creams and collagens. One foreskin can be used for decades to grow $100,000 worth of fibroblasts.

Debate is growing over the ethics of using human foreskins for cosmetic purposes. One such cosmetic company, SkinMedica is raising a stir over their use of the growth hormone left over from growing artificial skin from foreskin fibroblasts. Dr. Fitzpatrick, who invented SkinMedica, works with a supplier that uses foreskin fibroblast to make injectable collagen. The foreskins that he receives the growth hormone for are used especially for cosmetics rather than for growing new skin for medical patients.

SkinMedica, which sells for over $100 for a 63-oz. bottle, was made famous by Oprah Winfrey and Barbara Walters. Winfrey in fact has promoted SkinMedica several times on her show and website. Discussions about the ethics of using human foreskins for vanity have been circulating on the web but there has not been a response from Winfrey on this debate.

 
Comments 1 - 10 of 14 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

I heard from a family member that it is alos used in blush, but I have been unable to find any info on this...only that it is used in "cosmetics" and a face cream!!! Anyone with extra info please passs it along. I will be changing my makeup habits for sure, looking good has a limit and this passes it!!!!

Posted on 06/23/2009 at 8:06:02 AM

All this promotion to genitally mutilate young males; just shows how propaganda delivered effeciently sure warps people's minds and ideas. Dutch medical reseachers found in Jan 2007 (almost two years now) that the HIV-virus is actually destroyed by the cells in the inner-foreskin which completely 'shoots down' defies all the rhetoric we have been hearing for years. The pro-mutilation antagonists using the excuse of male genital mutilation to protect males (and partners) from infection.... WRONG!! Funny how it shows that most of the world's media didn't use this amazing discovery to rebut their wafflings. I stand bewildered... how easily people are manipulated!!!!!!!! -An Intactivist "a whole and happy man."

Posted on 12/01/2008 at 9:12:05 PM

Circumcision is a human rights violation. There is no justifiable reason to cut off healthy parts of a baby boy's body. It's usually not even done with anesthetics, and if you do a respiratory response analysis of a baby boy during a circumcision his heart rate reaches 180 beats per minute and his cortisol levels rise to around 300 nanmoles per liter, which are levels you would expect from a torture victim. Not to mention, the amputation of the clitoral hood is homologous to amputating the foreskin, but women are protected under the law from such violations. Men need some equal rights here, this is a truly unjust double standard.

Posted on 06/20/2008 at 2:06:04 PM

boi4foreskin@hotmail.com: A new clitoris-derived cosmetic cream from the infant clitoris amputated at birth gives rise to hope for diabetic patiants & Alzheimer's victims. The donors who volunteered the clitoral skin-excised at birth-is used to harvest many types of stem cells, including new ones never seen before. "This is a great breakthrough for science, and the booming cosmetic industry", says Emilios Stravapoulos, M.D., Chief scientist at ProGen Biotec Research. (Their address is at the Pentagon's DOD-DARPA facility for Advanced Research.)

Posted on 04/14/2008 at 11:04:27 AM

this is an outrage... it encourages profit for infant genital mutilation, and doctors are probably encouraging parents to circumsize when it isn't necessary! If it were female infant labia, would there be more of an issue? Why the sexism... Boys can be clean the way God made them... and if God made them the way they were born, Perfect why does he require a part of them be chopped off?

Posted on 11/30/2007 at 4:11:00 AM

I can't help but laugh - if I'd had a son and he'd been circumsized, and I knew that the hospitals were profitting from it, I'd be asking for my cut! (No pun intended)

Posted on 02/27/2007 at 6:02:00 PM

I knew about the fish scales, but not this. Good article.

Posted on 02/22/2007 at 4:02:00 AM

Heather B., but smegma is important stuff! Don't feel sad about it. :)

Posted on 02/17/2007 at 8:02:00 PM

Yeah, that's me...the smegma girl LOL! This is sad, I'm starting to be known for that smegma piece, when it's not even one of my better works. :/

Posted on 02/17/2007 at 8:02:00 PM

WOW, that's so interesting. I was aware that there are many unusual things used to make cosmetics, but I definitely wasn't aware that foreskin was one of them! I also see that smegma is used as well...good to know, Heather B!

Posted on 02/17/2007 at 4:02:00 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 14 Next >>