Find » Society » History » Should the United States Practice C...

Should the United States Practice Compulsory Voting?

Is Voting a Right or a Responsibility?

By Amy Mullen, published Feb 21, 2007
Published Content: 232  Total Views: 1,117,570  Favorited By: 17 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.6 of 5
This might be an unpopular opinion, but I believe that if you did not vote in the elections you have no reason or right to complain. There are many Americans who complain, yet they do not vote. I wonder how differently elections would work out with higher voter turn-out. I think we all wonder about that. The problem with that is that there is no way to get everyone to the polls short of compulsory voting. Some countries do this, but we do not. What would happen if compulsory voting came to the United States?

A conversation with a friend got me thinking about this. We were talking about how some people get heated to the point of name calling and low blows when political issues come up. We wondered what would happen if everyone in our country could muster up this type of passion, and take it to the polls each election to be heard in a way that matters. It seems that there is a lot of disinterest in some people, but others are willing to rip each other to shreds over the tiniest issues. This was when I brought up the topic of compulsory voting.

When I was younger I did not vote, even though I registered. I didn't care, and I didn't think my vote mattered. That changed around age 28 for me. I don't know what happened to me then, but suddenly it seemed very important to me that I start to vote. My first trip to the polls was a little intimidating, but I knew I was doing something important. I was one of the few people in my circle of friends, and even in my extended family, voting that year.

I hear many of these non-voters complaining about what is going on with in the United States, and I am baffled by this. If they cared that much, they should have gone out and voted. Many argue that voting is a right not a responsibility, and there might be some truth in that. However, how can you complain when you didn't do anything to rectify the situation? You may vote, and your candidate of choice may still lose, but at least then you have earned the right to complain.

Should the United States Practice Compulsory Voting?

In the 2004 elections, only 64% of people who could vote actually showed up to do so.

Credit: EAC

Copyright: EAC

Takeaways
  • In the 2004 elections, only 64% of people who could vote actually showed up to do so.
  • About 95% of Australians show up at the polls.
Did You Know?
Though compulsory voting might mean the elections would be a more accurate reflection of what the people of this country want, there are draw backs.
Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 20
Next >>
 
Interesting article, Amy! I don't agree with the compulsory voting, even though it would help and maybe make a difference. It would just be unconstitutional to make every citizen vote. I think the real problem is that this country hardly ever gives us anyone worth voting for. Maybe some of the third-party candidates, but as we've seen, there are certain checks in place so those people don't win.

Posted on 01/18/2008 at 10:01:38 AM

 
I have a hard time believing that anyone can actually distance themselves from politics. It touches everything we do. To not have a say in politics says that you are happy with the status quo, but I do not believe that it makes you "apolitical." I truly do not mean to be rude by that comment. Your views are your views.

Posted on 10/07/2007 at 8:10:00 PM

 
Many people choose not to vote because they are apolitical and wish to distance themselves from politics altogether, allowing others to vote if they so wish, but not wishing to themselves. That is their right. Sophie

Posted on 08/19/2007 at 10:08:00 AM

 
I was just reading the other day that in one election in California, a local election, that only about 19% of the registered voting population actually turned out to vote. It's sad, truly, but to make it required to vote in an essence does take away our freedom to choose. I mean... you know, when it comes down to it, it's a right and a privilege to vote (in that it can be taken away from certain felonies).. so isn't the right NOT to vote as American as the right TO vote?

Posted on 04/13/2007 at 12:04:00 AM

 
Only if "none of the above" is a choice. Those on the ballot at that time should not be given the chance to run again if the majority votes for "none of the above".

Posted on 03/21/2007 at 4:03:00 PM

 
Amy, I forgot to tell you in my last post....This last election Arizona had a ballot proposal to use $1 million dollars from lottery funds to pay one lucky, random voter every election in order to encourage people to vote. It was voted down, but that's the way to go. If you want to compel Americans into voting, you have to bribe them. That's how we grew up man. lol

Posted on 02/23/2007 at 2:02:00 PM

 
The U.S. has an abismal voter turnout - maybe some sort of incentive - a tax break, some sort of voucher- would get people to the polls. Another idea that is used in Europe is voting on weekends instead of on a workday. We could also make election day a holiday. Wouldn't it be fascinating to have the entire country vote to see what the true will of the people is? As people realize how important recent elections have been, maybe turnout will improve.

Posted on 02/23/2007 at 11:02:00 AM

 
I'm not behind compulsory voting, but I would strongly support a mandatory test of critical thinking and logic skills. If you don't pass, you don't vote.

Posted on 02/23/2007 at 7:02:00 AM

 
who cares about the "complaining", really? Honestly, you have to look at the group of non-voters and decide if you really want them voting anyway. I'm all for everyone voting, but uninformed votes are just as problematic as no votes, and arguably more so. Volume isn't the answer.

Posted on 02/22/2007 at 10:02:00 PM

 
Compulsory voting is not something I would want in this country. Jean had a great point. In addition, sometimes the choices of candidate someone has to choose from is sad at best. Some people choose not to vote for either because neither are a good choice. Maybe dumb, but it is their right to do so. Personally, I think many voters don't go to the polls because they are satisfied with the status quo. They don't find anything majorly affecting their lives, so they write it off. As soon as policy becomes personal, people are at the polls. i.e. voter turnout was higher this last election than two elections before it. The war in Iraq is dividing this country and people are showing up to show their support for either side.

Posted on 02/22/2007 at 8:02:00 PM

 
A small fine for nonvoters would be the same as compulsory voting. People shouldn't have to pay extra taxes to CHOSE not to vote, which some people do to make a political statement.

Posted on 02/22/2007 at 5:02:00 PM

 
I'm not in favor of people voting who are not interested enough in the process to study the issues and the candidates. Therefore compulsory voting would be my nightmare scenaro.

Posted on 02/22/2007 at 5:02:00 PM

 
Interesting article. I had never heard of compuslory voting before.

Posted on 02/22/2007 at 4:02:00 PM

 
And instead of saying we should force people to vote, you might be better off with a more reasonable & modest ideas. Maybe a tax break for voters or a small fine for nonvoters.

Posted on 02/22/2007 at 3:02:00 PM

 
I've never understood this cliché, that if you don't vote you "have no reason or right to complain." Seems dogmatic and illogical to me. I can think of many reasons for nonvoters to complain, and they undoubtedly have the right to complain.

Posted on 02/22/2007 at 3:02:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 20
Next >>
Advertisment