Find » Opinion/Editorial » Indiana Hate Crime Bill is a Step i...

Indiana Hate Crime Bill is a Step in the Right Direction

Indiana House Bill 1459

By Tanisha Renee, published Feb 22, 2007
Published Content: 46  Total Views: 38,317  Favorited By: 3 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.5 of 5
It really doesn't surprise me that Indiana is 1 of only 5 states in America without laws against hate crimes. However, the Indiana House took the first step toward changing this with Indiana House Bill 1459. This bill will allow judges to take into consideration whether hate was a motivating factor in a crime when determining a perpetrators sentence. The bill also allows victims of hate crimes to file civil suits against their perpetrators.

So what exactly is a hate crime? According to House Bill 1459, a hate crime is defined as "crimes in which an offender chooses a victim based on color, creed, disability, national origin, race, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity or sex".

While some believe that this bill sends an important message that hate motivated crimes will not be tolerated, others (including Rep. Eric Koch the only Indiana Representative who voted against the bill) believe that this bill will do nothing to deter hate motivated crimes. Still others believe that the bill is unfair in that it punished criminals more harshly for their thoughts. They believe that criminals should only be punished for the crimes they committed and not the thoughts they were thinking while they were committing the crime.

Did You Know?
The victims of this type of crime are not only the individual, but the whole group in which they target.
Comments
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
I have to say that Hate Crime bills are essentially unconstitutional. In the United States, people are free to believe anything they choose to believe, even if it is as idiotic as racist beliefs. However, if you move beyond punishing a person for an act, and instead start punishing for a belief that fueled the act, the law is now punishing a belief system. The law is not allowed to punish someone for his or her beliefs. Not only that, how will the law decide if a person acted out of hate that was not racist? What if someone attacks another person of a different race because they think the person deserves it based on the person actions, not on their race. This is a "political correct" move that will ultimately prove useless.

Posted on 02/19/2008 at 1:02:30 PM

 
My family and I are white. We complained about local authorities, and for almost 3 years SINCE, have been victimized by HATE CRIMES. This problem is rampant in Indiana. And our attorneys are pathetically inept, or too afraid, to help people like us. I know we are not alone, and we need others to speak up, and form a coalition to fight this home grown form of terrorism. Elaine Cox

Posted on 12/30/2007 at 3:12:53 PM

 
I agree that people should not be prosecuted for their thoughts. But I do think that hate crimes are different than other crimes because the criminal terrorizes and victimizes and ENTIRE group of people, not just the individual who experienced it.

Posted on 02/23/2007 at 5:02:00 AM

 
Prosecution of people for what they think is a very dangerous ans swampy piece of legal real estate. My thoughts, for example, are mine and to experience them and allow them to either grow or be purged are my decision to make. Our society is a long way from able to decide what is and who is guilty of hate. We don't even recognize what racism is unless it is coming from caucasians, how in the world are we ready to take this next step? Hate laws should scare us lots! Well written piece though.

Posted on 02/23/2007 at 4:02:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Advertisment