Single Word Causes Uproar in Children's Book

By Mike McQuillian, published Feb 17, 2007
Published Content: 13  Total Views: 18,983  Favorited By: 7 CPs
Rating: 3.3 of 5
It's rare to hear the word "scrotum," in polite conversation. Seeing it on the first page of a children's book has some parents and teachers up in arms.

On the first page of The Higher Power of Lucky by Susan Patron, this year's recipient of the Newbery Medal, Lucky Trimble, a scrappy ten-year-old orphan, hears the word through a hole in the wall. This happens when another character s explaining that a rattlesnake bit his dog on the scrotum.

Some school librarians, after hearing about the word being in The Higher Power of Lucky," have vowed to ban the book from their libraries. This has reopened the debate over what is acceptable for children to read.

Many teachers and school librarians have used the internet to weigh in on this issue. It has been a hot topic on dozens of literary blogs and social networking sites. Authors, teachers and school librarians have been forced to take sides in this battle over a book for children. All over the country librarians are debating their role when selecting (or censoring, as some say) literature for children.

Dana Nilsson, a teacher and librarian in Durango Colorado, had this to say about The Higher Power of Lucky": "This book included what I call a Howard Stern-type shock treatment just to see how far they could push the envelope, but they didn't have the children in mind."

A handful of school libraries in the South, West, and Northeast have already taken the book off of their shelves. Many more have indicated that they may do the same.

This topic has dominated conversation among librarians for the past ten days, ever since The Higher Power of Lucky was shipped to schools from the publisher.

Pat Scales, who at one time chaired the Newbery Award committee would be blatant censorship. When asked about the controversy she said "The people who are reacting to that word are not reading the book as a whole. That's what censors do - they pick out words and don't look at the total merit of the book."

This Newbrey Medal winner has cased quite a stir with one word.

Credit: Matt Phelan

Copyright: Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 86
Next >>
 
Good and nicely conveyed.

Posted on 03/02/2007 at 12:03:00 AM

 
Interestingly enough - when Billy Joel's song "Only the Good Die Young" was 'banned' by the Pope, the album went from falling off the charts to number one will a bullet in a few day's time. Joel in a press conference said the Pope was welcome to ban all future albums too. There's someone in a writer's forum I belong to that has a tagline saying something to the effect of, 'Go ahead and ban/burn my books, just read them first..." What's that they say about publicity? I still think it's way cool that someone on AC beat the big wigs to writing this up and then had bloggers say he thought of it first and was copied...LOL I loved it!

Posted on 03/01/2007 at 8:03:00 PM

 
Hard to believe, isn't it?

Posted on 03/01/2007 at 5:03:00 AM

 
http://januarymagazine.com/2007/02/kicked-right-in-tiddlywinks.html I thought you would enjoy this link in which a blogger compared your article to a NY Times article and said that they copied it from you!!! Way to go...LOL

Posted on 02/28/2007 at 10:02:00 PM

 
I enjoyed your article. This issue is just so strange to me. I cannot believe that we are censoring accurate terms for body parts. How ridiculous. School children are using words far more "vulgar" than scrotum that's for sure.

Posted on 02/28/2007 at 3:02:00 AM

 
Great article. I think if an author uses medically correct terms and it is done in a tasteful manner it should not be banned. I personally would rather my children learned the medical terms for their body parts over alot of the slang words. People have really gone over board on this one.

Posted on 02/25/2007 at 4:02:00 PM

 
We need to reach the point that we can say the proper names of body parts - ALL of them - without reacting as if there is something "bad" about words such as "scrotum". The comment that the author should have had the snake bite the dog's leg, on order to "avoid the whole situation" is nuts (no pun intended). Children should be able to use the words "scrotum", "penis", "vagina", in the proper context, without a bunch of Puritan adults freaking out.

Posted on 02/25/2007 at 8:02:00 AM

 
"This happens when another character s explaining that a rattlesnake bit his dog on the scrotum." Could the snake just as well have bitten the dog on the leg, and avoided the whole situation?

Posted on 02/24/2007 at 2:02:00 PM

 
JoyAnn Bradley: the correct medical terms for body parts are never inappropriate. I'd rather hear a child say scrotum than balls or nutsack. And I'd rather hear vagina than pussy or cunt. Ninigurl: I think about 1984 everyday. :( That is really what it's coming to.

Posted on 02/24/2007 at 12:02:00 PM

 
If a child in this day and age hasn't been explained about the facts of life and their own bodies by the age of 9 or 10 then their parents are risking that knowledge will come from somewhere else. And probably not accurate at all. Children are beginnning puberty earlier and earlier as the years go by. Parent's feigning ignorance over this fact is foolish! Also the "Thought Police" once again at their finest! Is there anyone out there beginning to feel like George Orwell's 1984 is becoming truth and no longer fiction in American society?

Posted on 02/24/2007 at 12:02:00 PM

 
Let's consider for a moment just who we're pretending to protect here. Presuming half the young readers are boys; they already own scrotums (or is it 'scroti'?) They have, no doubt, already made the connection b/n their anatomy and that of other mammals. As for the girls, have none of them been to the zoo? This 'uproar' is trite, overwrought Puritanism, nothing more. Kids learn prurient content from their parents' freak outs.

Posted on 02/24/2007 at 12:02:00 PM

 
Context is everything! Any word in a vulgar context could be offensive and inapropriate, but it doesn't sound like that was the case in this book. I really think parents and other adults should read a book before getting into an uproar over it. I havn't read this one so I can't say if it good or bad. There was such an uproar over the Harry Potter books when they came out that I decided I should read it, my step-son liked the book so I read his copy, now it is one of my favorites too. Don't judge a book by its cover, or listen to all the hype over it until you actually read it! Great Article topic by the way.

Posted on 02/24/2007 at 12:02:00 PM

 
I'm a teacher, and read all kinds of books to my second graders. If the book has a good story line, one word should not make it a bad book. Children of today are not innocent. I had to discipline a child the other day for saying this: "I am walking down the hall, scratching my balls." Now, where do you think he heard that word? Not at school and not in a book. He heard it at home along with all the other bad words. Authors can only do so much to "protect" a child from words. Parents should be protecting them from a lot more. I think scrotum is very mild compared to so much more these children are exposed to. Read some of Roald Dahl's books. Excellent stories: Matilda, James and the Giant Peach, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, just to name a few. But "ass" is in most of them. It doesn't ruin the story. The imagination used in writing these books are mind boggling! But,when I come to those words, I leave it out. Just b/c I know what reaction I would get from the class an

Posted on 02/24/2007 at 10:02:00 AM

 
I guess I look at is this way, if my 11 year old is writing a creative story, and I see the word scrotum, I would praise her for her creativity, then tell her to change it because, it may not be APPROPRIATE FOR YOUNGER READERS. As in HERSELF. What is so wrong being discrete? I don't let my kids walk around saying "VAGINA" because I am afraid of 'gasp' vagina. It is because it is not appropriate. Anyone ever tell you there is a time and place for some things. If you use it in context, like a book on body parts..helllllo??? no problem. Come on people, get some dignity.

Posted on 02/24/2007 at 9:02:00 AM

 
Is it just me or do adults seem to be more concerned their children will be scarred for life by learning the CORRECT terms for their body parts than they do about how their warped by unlimited violence on television and video games? Guess I'm old fashioned!

Posted on 02/24/2007 at 7:02:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 86
Next >>
Most Commented On