Snake Oil

...that statistically, global temperature change is a load of...well, you know. The variance (deviation) of the of the associated observations used to “compute” the changes are so big…especially when talking about climate model output…or proxy data used for historical records and input into the temperature data base…or even differences among the thermometers used at a set point over a period of time…NEGATE the verifiable possibility of any direct correlation of anthropogenic increases in CO2 causing global warming (or cooling)…and DEFINITELY WIPE OUT any possible consequences of said “possible” warming.

What we really need to monitor is the chance of a return to a real ice age (we are nearing the time of a natural return to a cooling period on Earth) because COLD KILLS (warmth gives and sustains life…just look at the past). And, if we are in a warming period (which is perfectly natural by the way…the Earth is a wildly dynamic system you know)…how will the precipitation patterns be changed?...that’s the real question, because water means life too. There is absolutely NO WAY to know what the direct (or indirect) changes to aerial coverage of precipitation would be (or the amounts either)…no matter what anybody tells you.