Legalization of Marijuana

Society's Negative View of Cannibus Has Been Proven Wrong

By Stephen Young, published Feb 28, 2007
Published Content: 5  Total Views: 1,589  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
Most people who oppose legalizing cannabis, commonly called marijuana, stereotype the substance's supporters as being liberal, uniformed, young people looking for a good time. While I may be young (20 years old), I am far from being liberal, and far from being uninformed. In fact I consider myself a strict conservative. I believe in the ideals of limited government and promoting citizens to be independent contributors to our nation's economy and our nation's general welfare. Individuals know how to run their lives better then the federal government. The government should only interfere if people's rights, as defined by our Constitution, are being restricted or violated. I feel legalizing marijuana for private recreational use does not violate anyone's rights.

It is not the government's job to enforce morality. Morality is subjective, so what gives the Federal Government the authority to decide what is morally right or morally wrong? If you do not share this viewpoint look at previous politicians. Former President Bill Clinton had several affairs while serving in the Oval Office, and lied under oath. Mark Foley had inappropriate relationships with young boys serving as pages for the Congressman. Many politicians are stereotyped as lying conmen who would do anything for a vote. Are these the type of people you want defining right and wrong? Another reason society should not give moral authority to the Federal Government is because it violates the First Amendment. Freedom of religion gives individuals the right to choose what religion best fits their beliefs, or moral values. Each religion has values that conflict other religion's values. By defining right and wrong, the Federal Government would be enforcing their own religious views on Americans, thus violating our first Amendment rights. Government has no place in religion and religion should not impact public policy.

What will soon become legal.

Credit: www.hyatt.com

Copyright: www.hyatt.com

Takeaways
  • Does not increase healthcare cost
  • Does not perpetuate violence
  • Is not a "gateway" drug
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
Oh, yeah, nice challenging write...maybe a bit out of focus to reality...but a nice write.

Posted on 03/01/2007 at 10:03:00 AM

 
Nice write. When I focus on this subject I think in terms of getting the government out of the drug business. It doesn't have a thing to do with religion or morality. It has to do with being able to raise huge capital, do it quick and do it under the table. The people are being sheep for letting this charade continue. I don't like weed, never did. Think it makes people idiots. I also believe it cuts down on how much people drink and therein lies another reason it is illegal. Anyway, points are these, weed is illegal because it's waaaay more valuable that way, it reduces the amount of beer/whiskey people drink and my views can't be personal because I wouldn't smoke the crap if it was free. It is far and away time to de-criminalize it though. Tax it to high heaven, and let 'em smoke 'em if they got 'em cuz they are anyway. Hey-it'd be a good way to make a platform for eliminating the IRS too-weed taxes would replace that...and crush the fed and IRS criminals!

Posted on 03/01/2007 at 10:03:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Most Commented On