Religious Fundamentalism: Impeding Freedom of Expression

By Adwin, published Mar 02, 2007
Published Content: 242  Total Views: 60,379  Favorited By: 4 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
Few would imagine that, in democratic, civilized societies, people would actually feel threatened, or coerced, to limit freedom of speech in the name of respect.

Inevitably, though, conflict arises between members of secular free press and the respective religious authorities, and from time to time, such conflicts may lead to sacrilegious outrage, the likes of which may lead to calls ranging from minor restrictions to freedom of the press and speech (Think book burning), or at the extreme end of the spectrum, calling for the heads of the purported perpetrators of the perceived blasphemy.

1. THE Case of Salman Rushdie

One of the most publicized, if not notorious, incident, involved a certain writer of Indian origin, Salman Rushdie.

In September 1988, publications of his controversial work, The Satanic Verses, which, amongst other things, was a direct impliance to a little-known fact of the Islamic religion, that of the three pagan goddesses, which was written, according to an Arab historian, Ibn Ishaq (Approx. A.D 700), by Muhammad and incorporated with the Islamic religion. Muhammad himself later revoked the goddesses, claiming he was under the influence of the Devil.

This inference, it seemed, was deemed too blasphemous by the Muslims world, and subsequent violent protests erupted in many parts of the world. India, Rushdie's homeland, became the first to ban the book. Iran's Ayatollah at that time, Khomeini, issued a fatwa (death edict) and issued a bounty for his life. The book's Japanese translator, Hitoshi Igarashi, was assassinated, stabbed to death at his university. Others, such as Italian translator Ettore Capriolo and publisher William Nygaard, survived assassination attempts.

Following the footsteps of India, many bookshops refused to sell Rusdie's book. Religion, it seems, has enforced its own standards on secular freethought: Respect, it seems, can only be earned through death threats, bloodshed and cold-blooded murder.

2. Danish Cartoons

Religious Fundamentalism: Impeding Freedom of Expression

Indian writer Salman Rushdie.

Credit: Ken Conley

Copyright: Ken Conley

Takeaways
  • Religion invoke strong emotions amongst believers,it should not be used as an excuse for violelence.
  • In September 2005, a series of cartoons mocking the founder of Islam ended with widespread of riots.
Did You Know?
Issuing death threats to authors and artistes whose works are deemed "blasphemous" is to spell the death of culture and creativity. Such brands of ultra-conservatism and violence should not be encouraged by governments...
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Most Commented On