InfoGoRound Review: A Unique Twist to PLR Sites

InfoGoRound is one of the first private label rights (PLR) sites that appear on the internet. Since that period, numerous other PLR sites have come and gone but InfoGoRound is still very much alive and well.

PLR sites usually don't survive for more than a year and the reason for that in my opinion is simple.

They do not over deliver. With so many PLR sites available, PLR site owners need to do more than just provide PLR articles. Nowadays, many PLR sites provides headers, graphics, site templates, site builders, PLR books, resale rights products and a lot of other stuff to entice people to join.

The problem is people want more. If your PLR site does not have what the next new PLR site has to offer, your members are going to jump ship. Plain and simple. So running a PLR site isn't as simple as what many marketers have you believed.

I have joined and left many PLR sites over the years but I have been with infogoround for more than a year already and I have been satisfied with their service since.

So what's so special about infogoround?

The most unique feature of infogoround is their content for cash program. Basically, it means if you submit an original article you have written to them and it is approved, they will refund you the current month's membership fee. So all I have to do is submit an original article to them every month and my infogoround membership is essentially free!

Look, if you really can't even write one article per month, you ought to look at yourself in the mirror. One of the essential skills any internet marketer should have is writing content. It is a skill that has proven to earn me money time and time again.

Most PLR sites limited their members to a certain number, usually around 250 to 500. However for Infogoround, there is no limit on the number of members. In fact, the more members there are, the better it is for everyone since there are more PLR articles in the database.

What about duplicate content you might ask? Wouldn't more members to the same articles produce more duplicate content?